Evaluation on Effectiveness of a New System as well as Analysis on Optimal Horizontal Eye Position for Vertical Video Head Impulse Test

Abstract

Objective

To compare the performances among three different systems for video head impulse test (vHIT), and to identify an optimal target angle for precisely evaluating the function of vertical semicircular canals in vHIT.

Methods

A two-center prospective study was done. Participants were sit 1.2 m away from the wall in a noise-proved room that dedicated for vHIT experiments. During the comparison experiments, similar settings were ensured in both hospitals, with the same distance to wall and angle of staring. For each equipment, the procedures followed the developers’ recommendations. The same examiner performed the comparison between two systems in one location. For the eye-position projects, targets were placed on the wall sequentially at the pre-marked lines for different angles. For the comparison projects, 9 and 13 participants were recruited, respectively. Any participant with otologic or vestibular disorders was excluded. A total of 26 healthy participants were recruited in the eye-position experiments, 16 of which were further involved in inter-examiner tests.

Results

Our evaluations of three different systems showed that a new vHIT system, VertiGoggles® ZT-VNG-I (VG) performed as good as the long-tested Otometrics® ICS impulse (Oto) and EyeSeeCam® (ESC). During the comparison, we validated 25-degree, instead of right ahead at 0 degree, is a better place to set the targets when torsion was applied at vertical semicircular canal planes.

Conclusion

The new VG system is good for clinical practices. Furthermore, we proposed a new protocol to set the targets 25 degrees from right ahead after tilting head 45 degrees to evaluate vertical canals during vHIT.

Keywords

video head impulse test / target angle / vestibular disorder / system comparison / goggles

References

[1] AbrahamsenER, ChristensenAE, HougaardDD. Intra- and Interexaminer Variability of Two Separate Video Head Impulse Test Systems Assessing All Six Semicircular Canals. Otol Neurotol, 2018, 39(2): e113-e22

[2] NeuhauserHK, von BrevernM, RadtkeA, et al.. Epidemiology of vestibular vertigo: a neurotologic survey of the general population. Neurology, 2005, 65(6): 898-904

[3] JiangT, KindtK, WuDK. Transcription factor Emx2 controls stereociliary bundle orientation of sensory hair cells. Elife, 2017, 6: e23661

[4] BárányRÜber die vom ohrlabyrinth ausgelöste gegenrollung der augen bei normalhörenden. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd, 1906, 68: 1-30

[5] BárányRUntersuchungen über den vom vestibularapparat des ohres reflektorisch ausgelösten rhytmischen nystagmus und seine begleiterscheinungen. (Ein Beitrag zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Bogengangapparates). Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd, 1906, 40: 193-297

[6] HenrikssonNG. An Electrical Method for Registration and Analysis of the Movements of the Eyes in Nystagmus. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1955, 45(1): 25-41

[7] Bárány R. Physiologie und pathologie (funktionsprüfung) des bogengang-apparates beim menschen: klinische studien. ranz-Deuticke-Verlag, Leipzig. 1907.

[8] HalmagyiGM, CurthoysIS. A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol, 1988, 45(7): 737-739

[9] AlhabibSF, SalibaI. Video head impulse test: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 274(3): 1215-1222

[10] HalmagyiGM, ChenL, MacDougallHG, et al.. The Video Head Impulse Test. Front Neurol, 2017, 8: 258

[11] MigliaccioAA, CremerPD. The 2D modified head impulse test: A 2D technique for measuring function in all six semi-circular canals. J Vestib Res, 2011, 21(4): 227-234

[12] McGarvieLA, Martinez-LopezM, BurgessAM, et al.. Horizontal Eye Position Affects Measured Vertical VOR Gain on the Video Head Impulse Test. Front Neurol, 2015, 6: 58

[13] ThurtellM, MacDougallHG, McGarvieLA, et al.. The Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Detects Vertical Semicircular Canal Dysfunction. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e61488

[14] CastroP, Sena EstevesS, LerchundiF, et al.. Viewing Target Distance Influences the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain when Assessed Using the Video Head Impulse Test. Audiol Neurotol, 2018, 23(5): 285-289

[15] JudgePD, RodriguezAI, BarinK, et al.. Impact of Target Distance, Target Size, and Visual Acuity on the Video Head Impulse Test. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 159(4): 739-742