Ultrasound Guidance and Nerve Stimulation Combined Versus Nerve Stimulation alone for Lumbar Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

A nerve stimulation-guided lumbar plexus block is a well-established technique. It is not clear whether ultrasound guidance has additional value for this deep block technique. This study aimed to examine whether ultrasound guidance using a paramedian transverse scan through the intertransverse space (PMTS-ITS) approach in combination with nerve stimulation reduces the onset time of a complete sensory block. Forty-four patients who were scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery with an ultrasound visibility score (UVS) of ≥10 for the lumbar plexus were enrolled and randomly allocated to the ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation group (group U-N) or nerve stimulation group (group N) in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study. The primary outcome was the onset time of a complete sensory block. The results showed that the onset time of a complete sensory block to pinprick and cold was 10 (10–40) min and 10 (10–40) min in group U-N, respectively, and 30 (10–40) min and 20 (10–40) min in group N (P=0.005, P=0.004), respectively. The performance time was 658±87 s in group U-N and 528±97 s in group N (P<0.001). There was no (0%) patient who required 5 or more needle passes in group U-N and 6 (27.3%) in group N (P=0.028). The block failure rate was 9.1% in group U-N and 31.8% in group N (P>0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound guidance using the PMTS-ITS approach in combination with nerve stimulation led to a faster onset of a complete sensory block than nerve stimulation alone for a lumbar plexus block in patients with a UVS ≥10. Ultrasound guidance with nerve stimulation significantly decreased the number of patients who required 5 or more needle passes.

Keywords

lumbar plexus block / ultrasound guidance / nerve stimulation / ultrasound visibility score

References

[1] MarhoferP, GreherM, KapralS. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 2005, 94(1): 7-17

[2] LiuSS. Evidence basis for ultrasound-guided block characteristics onset, quality, and duration. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(2): 205-220

[3] NealJM, BrullR, ChanVW, et al.. The asra evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: Executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010, 35(2): S1-9

[4] NealJM. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: Update of an evidence-based analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(2): 195-204

[5] AwadIT, DugganEM. Posterior lumbar plexus block: Anatomy, approaches, and techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2005, 30(2): 143-149

[6] KirchmairL, EntnerT, WisselJ, et al.. A study of the paravertebral anatomy for ultrasound-guided posterior lumbar plexus block. Anesth Analg, 2001, 93(4): 477-481

[7] KarmakarMK, HoAM, LiX, et al.. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block through the acoustic window of the lumbar ultrasound trident. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 100(4): 533-537

[8] KarmakarMK, LiJW, KwokWH, et al.. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block using a transverse scan through the lumbar intertransverse space: A prospective case series. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2015, 40(1): 75-81

[9] Sauter AR UK, Bendtsen TF, Borglum J. The ‘shamrock method’ a new and promising technique for ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block. Br J Anaesth, 2013 e-letter (http://www..bjaoxfordjournalsorg/forum/topic/brjana_el%3B9814)

[10] KarmakarMK, LiJW, KwokWH, et al.. Sonoanatomy relevant for lumbar plexus block in volunteers correlated with cross-sectional anatomic and magnetic resonance images. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2013, 38(5): 391-397

[11] KarmakarMK, LiX, HoAM, et al.. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: Evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 102(6): 845-854

[12] DoiK, SakuraS, HaraK. A modified posterior approach to lumbar plexus block using a transverse ultrasound image and an approach from the lateral border of the transducer. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2010, 38(1): 213-214

[13] KleinSM, MeltonMS, GrillWM, et al.. Peripheral nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2012, 37(4): 383-392

[14] WinnieA R, DurraniZ, RadonjicR. Plexus blocks for lower extremity surgery. Anesthesiol Rev, 1974, 1(1): 6

[15] MarhoferP, OismullerC, FaryniakB, et al.. Three-in-one blocks with ropivacaine: Evaluation of sensory onset time and quality of sensory block. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90(1): 125-128

[16] SitesBD, BeachML, ChinnCD, et al.. A comparison of sensory and motor loss after a femoral nerve block conducted with ultrasound versus ultrasound and nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2009, 34(5): 508-513

[17] BromagePR, BurfootMF, CrowellDE, et al.. Quality of epidural blockade. I. Influence of physical factors. Br J Anaesth, 1964, 36(6): 342-352

[18] LuR, ShenC, YangC, et al.. Comparison of lumbar plexus block using the short axis in-plane method at the plane of the transverse process and at the articular process: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol, 2018, 18: 17

[19] De AndresJ, Alonso-InigoJM, Sala-BlanchX, et al.. Nerve stimulation in regional anesthesia: Theory and practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2005, 19(2): 153-174

[20] FarnyJ, DroletP, GirardM. Anatomy of the posterior approach to the lumbar plexus block. Can J Anaesth, 1994, 41(6): 480-485

[21] SatoM, HaraM, UchidaO. An antero-lateral approach to ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in supine position combined with quadratus lumborum block using single-needle insertion for pediatric hip surgery. Paediatr Anaesth, 2017, 27(6): 1064-1065

[22] LiuY, KeX, WuX, et al.. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in supine position. Anesthesiology, 2018, 128(4): 812