Influence of Different Quality Sperm on Early Embryo Morphokinetic Parameters and Cleavage Patterns: A Retrospective Time-lapse Study

Abstract

To investigate whether sperm with low concentration and motility can impact preimplantation embryos and to analyze how the effects present under a time-lapse incubation system, 2905 oocytes were collected from 219 couples between January 2014 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three groups according to sperm quality. Morphokinetic parameters and six cleavage patterns in the initial three cleavages were evaluated using the Primo Vision system. Embryo quality and clinic outcomes such as implantation rate, pregnancy rate and live birth rate were measured. The results showed that the concentration and motility of sperm correlated strongly with the rate of 2PN embryos, good-quality embryos on D3, blastocysts on D5/6 and good-quality embryos on D5/6. The time-lapse system recordings showed that compromised sperm quality could result in a significant delay in cc1 and a decrease in cc2, and impact embryo developmental potential mainly through large fragments or/and blastomere fragmentation in the initial three cleavages. In conclusion, sperm with low concentration and motility can have paternal effects on preimplantation embryos. These paternal effects present both as changes in morphokinetic parameters and cleavage patterns, which occur as early as fertilization and may cause severe damage to the preimplantation embryos.

Keywords

embryo development / paternal effect / time-lapse / morphokinetic parameters / cleavage patterns

References

[1] CDC. Assisted reproductive technology success rates. National summary and fertility clinic reports. National Center for Chronic Disease and Prevention and Health Promotion, 2008, Atlanta, Georgia, Center for Disease Control and Prevention

[2] StefankiewiczJ, KurzawaR, DrozdzikM. Environmental factors disturbing fertility of men. Ginekol Pol, 2006, 77(2): 163-169

[3] TesarikJ, MendozaC, GrecoE. Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(1): 184-189

[4] BarrosoG, ValdespinC, VegaE, et al.. Developmental sperm contributions: fertilization and beyond. Fertil Steril, 2009, 92(3): 835-848

[5] CreanAJ, BondurianskyR. What is a paternal effect?. Trends Ecol Evol, 2014, 29(10): 554-559

[6] TesarikJ, KopecnýV, PlachotM, et al.. Early morphological signs of embryonic genome expression in human preimplantation development as revealed by quantitative electron microscopy. Dev Biol, 1988, 128(1): 15-20

[7] AgarwalA, ChoCL, EstevesSC. Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation?. Curr Opin Obstet Gyn, 2016, 28(3): 164-171

[8] BasileN, VimeP, FlorensaM, et al.. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod, 2015, 30(2): 276-283

[9] WongCC, LoewkeKE, BossertNL, et al.. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol, 2010, 28(10): 1115-1121

[10] YangST, ShiJX, GongF, et al.. Cleavage pattern predicts developmental potential of day 3 human embryos produced by IVF. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015, 30(6): 625-634

[11] RubioI, KuhlmannR, AgerholmI, et al.. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(6): 1458-1463

[12] DesaiN, GillP, TadrosNN, et al.. Azoospermia and embryo morphokinetics: testicular sperm-derived embryos exhibit delays in early cell cycle events and increased arrest prior to compaction. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018, 35: 1339-1349

[13] HuangB, QianK, LiZ, et al.. Neonatal outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of a 5-year period. Fertil Steril, 2015, 103(6): 1432-1437

[14] Embryology, Eshre Special Interest Group. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011, 22(6): 632-646

[15] GardnerDK, LaneM, StevensJ, et al.. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73: 1155-1158

[16] LiuY, ChappleV, FeenanK, et al.. Time-lapse videography of human embryos: using pronuclear fading rather than insemination in IVF and ICSI cycles removes inconsistencies in time to reach early cleavage milestones. Reprod Biol, 2015, 15(2): 122-125

[17] BodriD, SugimotoT, SernaJY, et al.. Influence of different oocyte insemination techniques on early and late morphokinetic parameters: retrospective analysis of 500 time-lapse monitored blastocysts. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(5): 1175-1181

[18] NeyerA, ZintzM, StecherA, et al.. The impact of paternal factors on cleavage stage and blastocyst development analyzed by time-lapse imaging— a retrospective observational study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015, 32(11): 1607-1614

[19] LammersJ, ReignierA, SplingartC, et al.. Does sperm origin affect embryo morphokinetic parameters?. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015, 32(9): 1-8

[20] StalfT, MehnertC, HajimohammadA, et al.. Influence of motility and vitality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Andrologia, 2010, 37(4): 125-130

[21] MeseguerM, HerreroJ, TejeraA, et al.. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(3): 2658-2671

[22] HlinkaD, KalátováB, UhrinováI, et al.. Time-lapse cleavage rating predicts human embryo viability. Physiol Res, 2012, 61(5): 513-525

[23] EzoeK, OhataK, MoritaH, et al.. Prolonged blastomere movement induced by the delay of pronuclear fading and first cell division adversely affects pregnancy outcomes after fresh embryo transfer on Day 2: a time-lapse study. Reprod Biomed Online, 2018, 38(5): 659-668

[24] ChenAA, TanL, SurajV, et al.. Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(4): 1035-1043

[25] SomfaiT, InabaY, AikawaY, et al.. Relationship between the length of cell cycles, cleavage pattern and developmental competence in bovine embryos generated by in vitro fertilization or parthenogenesis. J Reprod Dev, 2010, 56(2): 200-207

[26] RaweVY, OlmedoSB, NodarFN, et al.. Cytoskeletal organization defects and abortive activation in human oocytes after IVF and ICSI failure. Mol Hum Reprod, 2000, 6(6): 510-516

[27] AschR, SimerlyC, OrdT, et al.. The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes which failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Hum Reprod, 1995, 10(7): 1897-1906