Treatment of Infertile Women with Unilateral Tubal Occlusion Diagnosed by Hysterosalpingography: The Role of Intrauterine Insemination

Abstract

The optimal assisted reproductive treatment strategy for infertile women with unilateral tubal obstruction remains uncertain. To investigate the role of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of infertile women with unilateral tubal occlusion, the data of 148 couples were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Seventy-eight infertile women with unilateral occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography (HSG) were categorized as the study group and 70 others with unexplained infertility as the control group. The study group was divided into a proximal occlusion subgroup and a mid-distal occlusion subgroup for further analysis. The main outcomes, namely the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR) per cycle, were analyzed. Our results showed a tendency of lower CPR, OPR, and LBR in the study group than in the control group, without statistical significance. Further investigations revealed that the unilateral proximal occlusion subgroup had similar CPR, OPR, and LBR as the control group, while the unilateral mid-distal occlusion subgroup had significantly lower CPR (5.1% vs. 20.0%, P=0.035), OPR (5.1% vs. 20.0%, P=0.035), and LBR (5.1% vs. 20.0%, P=0.035) than the control group. In conclusion, the clinical outcomes of IUI were worse in patients with unilateral tubal occlusion than in those with unexplained infertility. This might be primarily caused by the worse outcome of patients with unilateral mid-distal tubal occlusion instead of proximal occlusion.

Keywords

hysterosalpingography / intrauterine insemination / unilateral tubal factor infertility

References

[1] LavyY, Lev-SagieA, HoltzerH, et al.. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2004, 114(1): 64-68

[2] NICE. Nice guideline: Fertility: for people with fertility problems. 2013. NICE clinical guideline 156 February 2013, 1.8.1.3–4

[3] BalaschJ. Investigation of the infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a time for reappraisal. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(11): 2251-2257

[4] HuC, ChenZ, ChenY, et al.. Analysis of Outcomes of Fertility Restoration Surgery in Women with Infertility Secondary to Tubal Pregnancy: A Series of 77 Cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 44(2): 195-199

[5] HonoreGM, HoldenAE, SchenkenRS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71: 785e95

[6] BenadivaCA, KligmanI, DavisO, et al.. In vitro fertilization versus tubal surgery: is pelvic reconstructive surgery obsolete?. Fertil Steril, 1995, 64: 1051e61

[7] FarhiJ, Ben-HaroushA, LandeY, et al.. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril, 2007, 88(2): 396-400

[8] WadinK, LonnemarkM, RasmussenC, et al.. Frequency of proximal tubal obstruction in patients undergoing infertility evaluation. Acta Radiol (Stockh), 1994, 35: 357-360

[9] NicholsKP, SteinkampfMP. Tubal surgery vs. in vitro fertilization for the treatment of infertility due to distal tubal occlusion. Prim Care Update Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 5: 168

[10] HuangLN, TanJ, HitkariJ, et al.. Should IVF be used as first-line treatment or as a last resort? A debate presented at the 2013 Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society meeting. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015, 30(2): 128-136

[11] TanJ, TannusS, TaskinTheO, et al.. Effect of Unilateral Tubal Block Diagnosed by Hysterosalpingogram on Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BJOG, 2019, 126(2): 227-235

[12] BerkerB, ŞükürYE, KahramanK, et al.. Impact of unilateral tubal blockage diagnosed by hysterosalpin-gography on the success rate of treatment with controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 34(2): 127-130

[13] CochetT, GatimelN, MoreauJ, et al.. Effect of unilateral tubal abnormalities on the results of intrauterine inseminations. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35(3): 314-317

[14] YiG, JeeBC, SuhCS, et al.. Stimulated intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion. Clin Exp Reprod Med, 2012, 39(2): 68-72

[15] LinMH, HwuYM, LinSY, et al.. Treatment of infertile women with unilateral tubal occlusion by intrauterine insemination and ovarian stimulation. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 52(3): 360-364

[16] EbrahimiM, Akbari AsbaghF, GhaseminejadA. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination cycles in patients with unilateral tubal blockage diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. Iran J Reprod Med, 2011, 9(1): 15-20

[17] YıldırımGY, KorkutAO, KöroǧluN, et al.. The Relations Between HSG Proven Tubal Occlusion, Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination and Pregnancy Rate. Balkan Med J, 2017, 34(1): 60-63

[18] MolBW, CollinsJA, BurrowsEA, et al.. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14: 1237-1242

[19] MolBW, SwartP, BossuytPM, et al.. Is hysterosal-pingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?. Fertil Steril, 1997, 67: 663-669

[20] CheongYC, LiTC. Evidence-based management of tubal disease and infertility. Current Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 15: 306-313

[21] LangE, DunawayHH. Recanalization of obstructed fallopian tube by selective salpingography and transvaginal bougie dilatation: outcome and cost analysis. Fertil Steril, 1996, 66: 210-215

[22] DessoleS, BattistaG, CapobiancoG, et al.. A second hysterosalpingography reduce the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73: 1037-1039

[23] AbraoMS, MuziiL, MaranaR. Anatomical causes of female infertility and their management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013, 123: S18-S24

[24] Al-JaroudiD, HerbaMJ, TulandiT. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2005, 12: 150-152

[25] DchaudH, ReyftmannL, FaidherbeJ. Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility. International Congress Series, 2004, 1266: 96-100