PDF
Abstract
This study aimed to construct a quality management model for phase I clinical drug trials. A cross-sectional survey was conducted and data were collected from 604 respondents at 69 institutions in China engaged in phase I clinical drug trials. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to develop the survey tool. Structural equation modeling was used to construct a quality management model for phase I clinical drug trials. The results showed that the final survey tool had good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α=0.938, root mean square error of approximation=0.074, comparative fit index=0.962, and Tucker—Lewis index=0.955). The model included five dimensions: government regulation, industry management, medical institution management, research team management, and contract research organization (CRO) management. In total, 22 measurement items were obtained. The structural equation model indicated government regulation, industry management, medical institution management, and CRO management significantly affected the quality of phase I clinical drug trials (β=0.195, β=0.331, β=0.279, and β=−0.267, respectively; P<0.05). Research team management had no effect on the quality of trials (β=0.041, P=0.610). In conclusion, the model is valuable for identifying factors influencing phase I clinical drug trials and guiding quality management practices.
Keywords
phase I clinical drug trials
/
quality
/
management
/
influence factor
/
structural equation model
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Yang Zhao, Qiu-xia Yang, Dan Wang, Xin-ping Zhang.
Quality Management Model for Phase I Clinical Drug Trials: A Structural Equation Model.
Current Medical Science, 2020, 40(3): 586-593 DOI:10.1007/s11596-020-2217-x
| [1] |
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry CGMP for Phase 1 Investigational Drugs. http://www.fda.gov. 2008. Accessed April 14, 2019
|
| [2] |
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Content and Format of Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) for Phase 1 Studies of Drugs, Including Well-Characterized, Therapeutic, Biotechnology-derived Products. http://www.fda.gov. 1995. Accessed April 14, 2019.
|
| [3] |
Association of The British Pharmaceutical Industry. Guidelines for phase 1 clinical trials 2012. http://www.abpi.org.uk. 2012.Accessed April 20, 2019
|
| [4] |
China Food and Drug Administration. Guidelines for the Management of Phase I Clinical Trials of Drugs (Trial). http://www.cfda.gov.cn. 2011. Accessed May 5, 2019
|
| [5] |
LemoineM. Animal extrapolation in preclinical studies: An analysis of the tragic case of TGN1412. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci, 2017, 61: 35-45
|
| [6] |
SprengerK, NickersonD, Meeker-O’ConnellA, et al.. Quality by Design in Clinical Trials: A Collaborative Pilot with FDA. Ther Innov Regul Sci, 2013, 47(2): 161-166
|
| [7] |
HaddadRI, ChanAT, VermorkenJB. Barriers to clinical trial recruitment in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol, 2015, 51(3): 203-211
|
| [8] |
WangB, CaoY, LiC, et al.. Analysis of the status of subject recruitment in clinical trials in Shandong, China. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2012, 7(1): 9-16
|
| [9] |
RabinC, TabakN. Healthy participants in phase I clinical trials: the quality of their decision to take part. J Clin Nurs, 2006, 15(8): 971-979
|
| [10] |
StrevelEL, ChauNG, PondGR, et al.. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for phase I cancer trials. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14(6): 1782-1787
|
| [11] |
WeinfurtKP. Varieties of uncertainty and the validity of informed consent. Clin Trials, 2008, 5(6): 624-625
|
| [12] |
KassNE. Early phase clinical trials: communicating the uncertainties of ‘magnitude of benefit’ and ‘likelihood of benefit’. Clin Trials, 2008, 5(6): 627-629 630
|
| [13] |
KassN, TaylorH, FogartyL, et al.. Purpose and benefits of early phase cancer trials: what do oncologists say? What do patients hear?. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 2008, 3(3): 57-68
|
| [14] |
AgrawalM, GradyC, FaircloughDL, et al.. Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(27): 4479-4484
|
| [15] |
WeinfurtKP, SeilsDM, TzengJP, et al.. Expectations of benefit in early-phase clinical trials: implications for assessing the adequacy of informed consent. Med Decis Making, 2008, 28(4): 575-581
|
| [16] |
CataniaC. Clinical trial nurse’s role in safety reporting. Nurs Forum, 2012, 47(1): 18-26
|
| [17] |
PostonRD, BuescherCR. The essential role of the clinical research nurse (CRN). Urol Nurs, 2010, 30(1): 55-63 77
|
| [18] |
SpilsburyK, PetherickE, CullumN, et al.. The role and potential contribution of clinical research nurses to clinical trials. J Clin Nurs, 2008, 17(4): 549-557
|
| [19] |
FariasIL, AraujoMC, FariasJG, et al.. Uncaria tomentosa for Reducing Side Effects Caused by Chemotherapy in CRC Patients: Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2012, 012: 892182
|
| [20] |
RhekerJ, RiefW, DoeringBK, et al.. Assessment of adverse events in clinical drug trials: Identifying amitriptyline’s placebo- and baseline-controlled side effects. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 2018, 26(3): 320-326
|
| [21] |
HoustonL, ProbstY, YuP, et al.. Exploring Data Quality Management within Clinical Trials. Appl Clin Inform, 2018, 9(1): 72-81
|
| [22] |
KuchinkeW, OhmannC, YangQ, et al.. Heterogeneity prevails: the state of clinical trial data management in Europe — results of a survey of ECRIN centres. Trials, 2010, 11: 9
|
| [23] |
MoherD, JadadAR, TugwellP. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 1996, 12(2): 195-208
|
| [24] |
VerhagenAP, de VetHC, de BieRA, et al.. The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2001, 54(7): 651-654
|
| [25] |
MaherCG, SherringtonC, HerbertRD, et al.. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther, 2003, 83(8): 713-721
|
| [26] |
Liu WN, Zhang YL, Lu Y, et al. Discussion on quality management mode of multi-center clinical trial. Chin J Clin Pharmacol, 2007 (01):70–72
|
| [27] |
SchreiberJB, StageFK, KingJ, et al.. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res, 2006, 99(6): 323-338
|
| [28] |
ShenYH, LiMZ, ZhangXP, et al.. Development and influencing factors of compliance behaviors of investigators in clinical trials. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2014, 34(2): 284-288
|
| [29] |
ShuchmanM. Commercializing clinical trials—risks and benefits of the CRO boom. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(14): 1365-1368
|
| [30] |
LeiX, WangXH, LiJ, et al.. Development and changes of CRO of clinical trials in China. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2018, 18(08): 783-786
|