Antidiastole Value of Three-dimensional Ultrasonography and Power Doppler between Uterine Parenchyma Lumps and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Yan Zhang, Jing Chen, Zeng Zhen, Xiao-yan Xu

Current Medical Science ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 816-819.

Current Medical Science ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 816-819. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2110-7
Article

Antidiastole Value of Three-dimensional Ultrasonography and Power Doppler between Uterine Parenchyma Lumps and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Sometimes endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, and endometrial cancer show similar findings under ultrasonography. The aim of this study was to assess the antidiastole value of blood flow parameters using three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler ultrasonography angiography (PDA) between endometrial cancer and uterine parenchyma lumps. The data of the blood flow indices in 3D-PDA including the vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) in 40 patients with endometrial cancer and 41 patients with uterine parenchyma lumps (endometrial polyps and submucosal myomas) were retrospectively analysed and compared utilizing Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) software. The results showed that all the blood flow parameters (VI, FI, VFI) were significantly higher in women with endometrial cancer than in those with uterine parenchyma lumps (P<0.001). The area under the curve of ROC of VI, FI, and VFI was 0.98, 0.84, and 0.97, respectively. Thus, the best predictor of endometrial carcinoma was VI with a sensitivity of 97.0% and a specificity of 91.0%. The optimal cutoff value of VI was 4.06%. Our data demonstrated that all of the blood flow signal parameters (including VI, FI, and VFI) in 3D power Doppler ultrasonography had significant antidiastole values between endometrial cancer and uterine parenchyma lumps to assist clinicians in properly diagnosing patients.

Keywords

power Doppler / three-dimensional ultrasound / uterine parenchyma lump / endometrial carcinoma / blood flow signal parameter

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan Zhang, Jing Chen, Zeng Zhen, Xiao-yan Xu. Antidiastole Value of Three-dimensional Ultrasonography and Power Doppler between Uterine Parenchyma Lumps and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Current Medical Science, 2019, 39(5): 816‒819 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2110-7

References

[1]
ParkinDM, BrayF, FerlayJ, et al.. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2): 74-108
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
GreenwaldZR, HuangLN, WissingMD, et al.. Does hormonal therapy for fertility preservation affect the survival of young women with early-stage endometrial cancer?. Cancer, 2017, 123(9): 1545-1554
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
FolkmanJ. Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med, 1995, 333(26): 1757-1763
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
HanahanD, FolkmanJ. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell, 1996, 86(3): 353-364
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
ChenJJ, ChenJJ, ChiangCS, et al.. Assessment of tumor vasculature for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in a mouse model in vivo using 25-MHz power Doppler imaging. Ultrasonics, 2011, 51(8): 925-931
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
ChoiBI, KimTK, HanJK, et al.. Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of vasculature in liver tumors. Radiology, 1996, 200(1): 55-58
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
FleischerAC, WojcickiWE, DonnellyEF, et al.. Quantified color Doppler sonography of tumor vascularity in an animal model. J Ultrasound Med, 1999, 18(8): 547-551
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
PairleitnerH, SteinerH, HasenoehrlG, et al.. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 14(2): 139-143
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Raine-FenningN, CampbellB, CollierJ, et al.. The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL-imaging program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 19(1): 69-75
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
El-SharkawyM, El-MaznyA, RamadanW, et al.. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler for discrimination between benign and malignant endometrium in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. BMC Womens Health, 2016, 16: 18
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
MercéLT, AlcázarJL, LópezC, et al.. Clinical usefulness of 3-dimensional sonography and power doppler angiography for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(10): 1279-1287
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
OdehM, VainerovskyI, GrininV, et al.. Three-dimensional endometrial volume and 3-dimensional power Doppler analysis in predicting endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 106(2): 348-353
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
ErenelH, BeseT, SalV, et al.. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracies of Serum HE-4 Levels and 3D Power Doppler Angiography Parameters between Benign Endometrial Pathologies and Endometrial Cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 17(5): 2507-2511
[14]
LiengM, QvigstadE, DahlGF, et al.. Flow differences between endometrial polyps and cancer: a prospective study using intravenous contrast-enhanced transvaginal color flow Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(7): 935-940
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/