Relationship between Atrial Tissue Remodeling and ECG Features in Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract

The difference in the atrial organizational structure between patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and those with sinus rhythm was investigated. In order to analyze the rationality in explaining the electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics of AF with statistics data or tissue remodeling model, and the logical relationship between the hypothesis of pulmonary veins (PV) muscle sleeves and that of multi wavelets in mechanism of AF, we examined the expression of collagen volume fraction of type I (CVF-I) with picrosirius red staining, connexin 40 (Cx40) by immunohistochemistry, and intercalated disc (ID) using transmission electron microscope in atrial tissue. The results showed that there was significant difference in the expression of CVF-I (t=3.827, P<0.01), Cx40 (t=4.21, P<0.01), and groups of the ID that keeping the electrical transmission and atrial electrical coupling synchronization (t=15.116, P<0.001), but no significant difference was found in total IDs (t=0.611, P=0.543) between patients with AF and those with sinus rhythm. The quantitative differences in the tissue remodeling could not explain the ECG characteristics of AF. The number of normal IDs and abnormal distribution are the structural basis to trigger and maintain atrial electrical remodeling, and induce and maintain AF. Such histological reconstruction supports the hypothesis of multi wavelets and can also explain ECG features.

Keywords

atrial fibrillation / collagen volume fraction of type I / Cx40 / intercalated disc / electrocardiogram

References

[1] SchottenU, DobrevD, PlatonovPG, et al.. Current controversies in determining the main mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. J Intern Med, 2016, 279(5): 428-438

[2] SteinerI, HajkovaP, KvasnickaJ, et al.. Myocardial sleeves of pulmonary veins and atrial fibrillation: a postmortem histopathological study of 100 subjects. Virchows Arch, 2006, 449(1): 88-95

[3] GemelJ, LevyAE, SimonAR, et al.. Connexin40 abnormalities and atrial fibrillation in the human heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2014, 76: 159

[4] LuoMH, LiYS, YangKP. Fibrosis of Collagen I and Remodeling of Connexin 43 in Atrial Myocardium of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiology, 2007, 107(4): 248-253

[5] McArthurL, ChiltonL, SmithGL, et al.. Electrical consequences of cardiac myocyte: fibroblast coupling. Biochem Soc Trans, 2015, 43(3): 513-518

[6] SeversNJ, BruceAF, DupontE, et al.. Remodeling of gap junctions and connexin expression in diseased myocardium. Cardiovasc Res, 2008, 80(1): 8-19

[7] DunW, LoweJS, WrightP, et al.. Ankyrin-G participates in INa remodeling in myocytes from the border zones of infarcted canine heart. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10): e78087

[8] SchottenU, DobrevD, PlatonovPG, et al.. Current controversies in determining the main mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. J Intern Med, 2016, 279(5): 428-438

[9] ChenPS, ChouCC, TanAY, et al.. The mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006, 17: S2-7

[10] ScherrD. Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: pulmonary vein isolation, ablation of fractionated electrograms, stepwise approach or rotor ablation. Herz, 2015, 40(1): 31-36

[11] Advisory SecretariatM. Ablation for atrial fibrillation: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 2006, 6(7): 1-63

[12] OkadaM, HirataA, KashiwaseK, et al.. Fibrillatory pattern of dissociated venous activity after pulmonary vein isolation: Novel characteristics for remnant foci of a trigger ectopy for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol, 2017, 69(6): 859-867

[13] MiyazakiS, TaniguchiH, KusaS, et al.. Five-year follow-up outcome after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using a sequential biatrial linear defragmentation approach: What does atrial fibrillation termination during the procedure imply?. Heart Rhythm, 2017, 14(1): 34-40

[14] SadekMM, MaedaS, ChikW, et al.. Recurrent atrial arrhythmias in the setting of chronic pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm, 2016, 13(11): 2174-2180

[15] BaekYS, YangPS, KimTH, et al.. Delayed recurrence of atrial fibrillation 2 years after catheter ablation is associated with metabolic syndrome. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 223: 276

[16] FerreiraR, PrimoJ, AdãoL, et al.. Late atypical atrial flutter after ablation of atrial fibrillation. Rev Port Cardiol, 2016, 35(10): 539.e1-6

[17] TanNY, MohsinY, HodgeDO, et al.. Catheter Ablation for Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients with Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2016, 27(10): 1167-1173

[18] TilzRR, RilligA, ThumAM, et al.. Catheter Ablation of Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: 5-Year Outcomes of the Hamburg Sequential Ablation Strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(19): 1921-1929

[19] MulderAA, WijffelsMC, WeverEF, et al.. Freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after successful pulmonary vein isolation with pulmonary vein ablation catheter-phased radiofrequency energy: 2-year follow-up and predictors of failure. Europace, 2012, 14(6): 818-825

[20] SorgenteA, TungP, WylieJ, et al.. Six year follow-up after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a palliation more than a true cure. Am J Cardiol, 2012, 109(8): 1179-1186

[21] SantangeliP D B L, MohantyP, et al.. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: safety and outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2012, 23(7): 687-693

[22] WeerasooriyaR, KhairyP, LitalienJ, et al.. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up?. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 57(2): 160-166