Does Postoperative Rehabilitation for Radical Cystectomy Call for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jun Xiao , Meng Wang , Wei He , Jing Wang , Fan Yang , Xue-you Ma , Yu Zang , Chun-guang Yang , Gan Yu , Zhi-hua Wang , Zhang-qun Ye
Current Medical Science ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 99 -110.
The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until September 2017 which involved a comparison of ERAS and SC. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of ERAS versus SC. Sixteen studies including 8 prospective and 8 retrospective trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2100 participants were assigned to ERAS (1258 cases) or SC (842 cases). The time to first flatus passage {WMD=–0.95 days, 95% CI (–1.50,–0.41), P=0.0006}, time until return to a regular diet {WMD=–2.15 days, 95% CI (–2.86,–1.45), P<0.00001} and the length of hospital stay {WMD=–3.75 days, 95% CI (–5.13,–2.36), P<0.00001} were significantly shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications {OR=0.60, 95% CI (0.44, 0.83), P=0.002}, especially postoperative paralytic ileus {OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.30, 0.62), P<0.00001} and cardiovascular complications {OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09, 0.90), P=0.03} was significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the SC group. This meta-analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a shorter time to first flatus passage, return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay than SC in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications, especially paralytic ileus and cardiovascular complications.
enhanced recovery after surgery / postoperative rehabilitation / bladder cancer / radical cystectomy / meta-analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Version 5.0.1 [Updated September] The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Pre–Operative Carbohydrate Loading or Hydration: A Review of Clinical and Cost–Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa ON: 2016 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. 2016. |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |