Effect of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Cortex Excitability in Rats

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS), combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) in pairs with an optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) in between, has been shown to influence the excitability of the motor cortex (MC) in humans. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study was designed to explore an optimal protocol of PAS, which can modulate the excitability of MC in rats, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) of TMS-elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the gastrocnemius muscle and the latency of P1 component of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) induced by electrical tibial nerve stimulation were determined in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=10). Sixty rats were then randomly divided into 3 groups: a PAS group (further divided into 10 subgroups at various ISIs calculated by using the latency of P1, n=5, respectively), a TMS (only) group (n=5) and a PNS (only) group (n=5). Ninety repetitions of PAS, TMS and PNS were administered to the rats in the 3 groups, respectively, at the frequency of 0.05 Hz and the intensity of TMS at 120% RMT and that of PNS at 6 mA. RMTs and motor evoked potentials’ amplitude (MEPamp) were recorded before and immediately after the interventions. It was found that the MEPamp significantly decreased after PAS at ISI of 5 ms (P<0.05), while the MEPamp significantly increased after PAS at ISI of 15 ms, as compared with those before the intervention (P<0.05). However, the RMT did not change significantly after PAS at ISI of 5 ms or 15 ms (P>0.05). PAS at other ISIs as well as the sole use of TMS and PNS induced no remarkable changes in MEPamp and RMT. In conclusion, PAS can influence motor cortex excitability in rats. Neither TMS alone nor PNS alone shows significant effect.

Keywords

paired associative stimulation / transcranial magnetic stimulation / peripheral nerves / electrical stimulation / resting motor thresholds / motor evoked potentials / somatosensory evoked potentials

References

[1] StefanK, KuneschE, CohenLG, et al.. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain, 2000, 123: 572-584

[2] MeunierS, RussmannH, Simonetta-MoreauM, et al.. Changes in spinal excitability after PAS. J Neurophysiol, 2007, 97(4): 3131-3135

[3] KumruH, AlbuS, RothwellJ, et al.. Modulation of motor cortex excitability by paired peripheral and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 128(10): 2043-2047

[4] CortesM, ThickbroomGW, Valls-SoleJ, et al.. Spinal associative stimulation: A non-invasive stimulation paradigm to modulate spinal excitability. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 122(11): 2254-2259

[5] WoltersA, SandbrinkF, SchlottmannA, et al.. A temporally asymmetric hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 2003, 89(5): 2339-2345

[6] StefanK, KuneschE, BeneckeR, et al.. Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation. J Physiol, 2002, 543: 699-708

[7] Castel-LacanalE, MarqueP, TardyJ, et al.. Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in the recovery phase of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009, 23(4): 366-372

[8] JungP, ZiemannU. Homeostatic and nonhomeostatic modulation of learning in human motor cortex. J Neurosci, 2009, 29(17): 5597-5604

[9] JayaramG, StinearJW. Contralesional paired associative stimulation increases paretic lower limb motor excitability post-stroke. Exp Brain Res, 2008, 185(4): 563-570

[10] RogersLM, BrownDA, StinearJW. The effects of paired associative stimulation on knee extensor motor excitability of individuals post-stroke: a pilot study. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 122(6): 1211-1218

[11] MichouE, MistryS, JeffersonS, et al.. Targeting unlesioned pharyngeal motor cortex improves swallowing in healthy individuals and after dysphagic stroke. Gastroenterology, 2012, 142(1): 29-38

[12] MichouE, MistryS, JeffersonS, et al.. Characterizing the mechanisms of central and peripheral forms of neurostimulation in chronic dysphagic stroke patients. Brain Stimul, 2014, 7(1): 66-73

[13] StinearJW, HornbyTG. Stimulation-induced changes in lower limb corticomotor excitability during treadmill walking in humans. JPhysiol, 2005, 567: 701-711

[14] StefanK, WycisloM, ClassenJ. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol, 2004, 92(1): 66-72

[15] ZiemannU. TMS induced plasticity in human cortex. Rev Neurosci, 2004, 15(4): 253-266

[16] QuartaroneA, RizzoV, BagnatoS, et al.. Rapid-rate paired associative stimulation of the median nerve and motor cortex can produce long-lasting changes in motor cortical excitability in humans. J Physiol, 2006, 575: 657-670

[17] FratelloF, VenieroD, CurcioG, et al.. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation: reproducibility of effects and intraindividual reliability. Clin Neurophysiol, 2006, 117(12): 2667-2674

[18] MüllerJF, OrekhovY, LiuY, et al.. Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation. Eur J Neurosci, 2007, 25(11): 3461-3468

[19] SaleMV, RiddingMC, NordstromMA. Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res, 2007, 181(4): 615-626

[20] Müller-DahlhausJF, OrekhovY LiuY, et al.. Interindividual variability and age-dependency of motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res, 2008, 187(3): 467-475

[21] Mrachacz-KerstingN, FongM, MurphyBA, et al.. Changes in excitability of the cortical projections to the human tibialis anterior after paired associative stimulation. J Neurophysiol, 2007, 97(3): 1951-1958

[22] AmayaF, PaulusW, TreueS, et al.. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and PAS-induced cortical neuroplasticity in the awake rhesus monkey. Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 121(12): 2143-2151

[23] HeideggerT, KrakowK, ZiemannU. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on associative LTP-like plasticity in human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci, 2010, 32(7): 1215-1222

[24] KorchounovA, ZiemannU. Neuromodulatory neurotransmitters influence LTP-like plasticity in human cortex: a pharmaco-TMS study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011, 36(9): 1894-1902

[25] IlicNV, MilanovicS, KrsticJ, et al.. Homeostatic modulation of stimulation-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Physiol Res, 2011, 60: S107-S112

[26] VoytovychH, KrivánekováL, ZiemannU. Lithium: A switch from LTD-to LTP-like plasticity in human cortex. Neuropharmacology, 2012, 63(2): 274-279

[27] PriorMM, StinearJW. Phasic spike-timingdependent plasticity of human motor cortex during walking. Brain Res, 2006, 1110(1): 150-158

[28] JayaramG, SantosL, StinearJW. Spike-timingdependent plasticity induced in resting lower limb cortex persists during subsequent walking. Brain Res, 2007, 1153: 92-97

[29] ShulgaA, LioumisP, KirveskariE, et al.. The use of F-response in defining interstimulus intervals appropriate for LTP-like plasticity induction in lower limb spinal paired associative stimulation. J Neurosci Methods, 2015, 242: 112-117

[30] ShinH, HanT, PaikN. Effect of consecutive application of paired associative stimulation on motor recovery in a rat stroke model: a preliminary study. Int J Neurosci, 2009, 118(6): 807-820

[31] ToleikisJR. Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Monit Comput, 2005, 19(3): 241-258

[32] ZhangYP, ShieldsLB, ZhangY, et al.. Use of magnetic stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and H-reflexes in non-sedated rodents. J Neurosci Methods, 2007, 165(1): 9-17

[33] ZhangS, HuangF, GatesM, et al.. Somatosensory evoked potentials can be recorded on the midline of the skull with subdermal electrodes in non-sedated rats elicited by magnetic stimulation of the tibial nerve. J Neurosci Methods, 2012, 208(2): 114-118

[34] AgrawalG, KerrC, ThakorNV, et al.. Characterization of graded multicenter animal spinal cord injury study contusion spinal cord injury using somatosensoryevoked potentials. Spine, 2010, 35(11): 1122-1127

[35] LeeSY, KimBR, HanEY. Association between evoked potentials and balance recovery in subacute hemiparetic stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med, 2015, 39(3): 451-461

[36] HwangP, SohnMK, KimC, et al.. Tibial somatosensory evoked potential can prognosticate for ambulatory function in subacute hemiplegic stroke. J Clin Neurosci, 2016, 26: 122-125

[37] SakataniK, IizukaH, YoungW. Somatosensory evoked potentials in rat cerebral cortex before and after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke, 1990, 21(1): 124-132

[38] HendricksHT, PasmanJW, van LimbeekJ, et al.. Motor evoked potentials of the lower extremity in predicting motor recovery and ambulation after stroke: a cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84(9): 1373-1379

[39] Kaelin-LangA, LuftAR, SawakiL, et al.. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol, 2002, 540(2): 623-633

[40] LuftA, Kaelin-LangA, HauserT, et al.. Modulation of rodent cortical motor excitability by somatosensory input. Exp Brain Res, 2002, 142(4): 562-569

[41] KimYH, YouSH, KoMH, et al.. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke, 2006, 37(6): 1471-1476

[42] TakeuchiN, TadaT, ToshimaM, et al.. Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med, 2008, 40(4): 298-303

[43] ConfortoAB, FerreiroKN, TomasiC, et al.. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2010, 24(3): 263-272

[44] YangL, WangSH, HuY, et al.. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on astrocytes proliferation and nNOS expression in neuropathic pain rats. Curr Med Sci, 2018, 38(3): 482-490

[45] RiddingMC, TaylorJL. Mechanisms of motorevoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans. J Physiol, 2001, 537(2): 623-631

[46] BisioA, AvanzinoL, GueugneauN, et al.. Observing and perceiving: a combined approach to induce plasticity in human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol, 2015, 126(6): 1212-1220