A Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Tendon Allograft: A Comparative Study

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) of using quadrupled hamstring (4HT) autografts and two-strand tibialis anterior (2TA) allografts, and to find out the rate of graft failure and possible causes. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the clinical outcome, and graft failure would be associated with the use of small sized allograft in young active males with high demand of sports activities. We retrospectively evaluated 222 patients (male, n=167, female, n=55) undergoing ACL-R between January 2010 and July 2014. Of 222 patients, 115 were included in the 4HT autograft group and 107 patients in the 2TA allograft group. Inclusion criteria were primary unilateral ACL-R with a minor MCL (<grade II) injury with or without meniscus tear and had at least 2.5 years of follow-up. Subjective evaluation was performed using Tegner-Lysholm score, modified Cincinnati knee score, and IKDC knee form. Anteroposterior laxity was assessed using ADT and Lachman test whereas rotational laxity was assessed using pivot shift test. Similarly, functional assessment was performed using range of motion (ROM), Daniel’s one-leg hop test, and overall IKDC score. Clinical outcomes were satisfactory and comparable in both groups with no statistically significant difference in all the respective parameters. No statistically significant difference was observed in graft re-rupture rate. However, most graft failures occurred in young active males with high demand of sports activities, graft size smaller than 8 mm, and use of allograft. An autograft with at least 8 mm diameter should be considered in a young active male with high demand of sports activities to avoid graft failure.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction / autograft / allograft / hamstring tendon / tibialis anterior tendon

References

[1] SajovicM, VengustV, KomadinaR, et al.. A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34(12): 1933-1940

[2] BorchersJR, PedrozaA, KaedingC. Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37(12): 2362-2367

[3] JBJS Rev, 2015, 3(11):

[4] EngelmanGH, CarryPM, HittKG, et al.. Comparison of allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft survival in an active adolescent cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(10): 2311-2318

[5] KaedingCC, PedrozaAD, ReinkeEK, et al.. Risk Factors and Predictors of Subsequent ACL Injury in Either Knee After ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Analysis of 2488 Primary ACL Reconstructions From the MOON Cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(7): 1583-1590

[6] SunK, ZhangJ, WangY, et al.. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2. 5 years' follow-up comparing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(9): 1195-1202

[7] ChangSK, EgamiDK, ShaiebMD, et al.. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft versus autograft. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(5): 453-462

[8] SunK, ZhangJ, WangY, et al.. A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and nonirradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2012, 20(1): 187-194

[9] EdgarCM, ZimmerS, KakarS, et al.. Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(9): 2238-2246

[10] LandesS, NylandJ, ElmlingerB, et al.. Knee flexor strength after ACL reconstruction: comparison between hamstring autograft, tibialis anterior allograft, and non-injured controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010, 18(3): 317-324

[11] XieX, LiuX, ChenZ, et al.. A meta-analysis of bonepatellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee, 2015, 22(2): 100-110

[12] LawhornKW, HowellSM, TrainaSM, et al.. The effect of graft tissue on anterior cruciate ligament outcomes: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing autograft hamstrings with fresh-frozen anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(8): 1079-1086

[13] BuckBE, MalininTI, BrownMD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, 240: 129-136

[14] Centers for Disease ControlPrevention.. Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tendon allografts-Florida and Louisiana. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2001, 50(48): 1081-1083

[15] Centers for Disease ControlPrevention.. Invasive Streptococcus pyogenes after allograft implantation-Colorado. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2003, 52(48): 1174-1176

[16] HarnerCD, HonkampNJ, RanawatAS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(1): 113-115

[17] LuoH, YuJK, AoYF, et al.. Relationship between different skin incisions and the injury of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Chin Med J (Engl), 2007, 120(13): 1127-1130

[18] BertramC, PorschM, HackenbrochMH, et al.. Saphenous neuralgia after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7): 763-766

[19] SunK, ZhangJ, WangY, et al.. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(7): 1430-1438

[20] TegnerY, LysholmJ. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985, 198: 43-49

[21] NoyesFR, BarberSD, MooarLA. A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, 246: 238-249

[22] IKDC Committee, AOSSM (2000) IKDC knee forms. Edited, http://www. sportsmed.org/research/docs/IKDC_2000. doc.

[23] LeysT, SalmonL, WallerA, et al.. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(3): 595-605

[24] WipflerB, DonnerS, ZechmannCM, et al.. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(5): 653-665

[25] AdachiN, OchiM, UchioY, et al.. Harvesting hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction influences postoperative hamstring muscle performance. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003, 123(9): 460-465

[26] LautamiesR, HarilainenA, KettunenJ, et al.. Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(11): 1009-1016

[27] JanssenRP, SchefflerSU. Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(9): 2102-2108

[28] JiaYH, SunPF. Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Autograft and Allograft Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(23): 3163-3166

[29] Haut DonahueTL, HowellSM, HullML, et al.. A biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior tibialis tendons as suitable single-loop anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(6): 589-597

[30] SheltonWR, TreacySH, DukesAD, et al.. Use of allografts in knee reconstruction: II. Surgical considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1998, 6(3): 169-175

[31] RihnJA, IrrgangJJ, ChhabraA, et al.. Does irradiation affect the clinical outcome of patellar tendon allograft ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2006, 14(9): 885-896

[32] FidelerBM, VangsnessCTJr, LuB, et al.. Gamma irradiation: effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med, 1995, 23(5): 643-646

[33] SinghalMC, GardinerJR, JohnsonDL. Failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament surgery using anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(5): 469-475

[34] PearsallA, HollisJM, RussellGVJr, et al.. A biomechanical comparison of three lower extremity tendons for ligamentous reconstruction about the knee. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(10): 1091-1096

[35] ShinoK, InoueM, HoribeS, et al.. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using allogeneic tendon. Long-term followup. Am J Sports Med, 1990, 18(5): 457-465

[36] TejwaniSG, ChenJ, FunahashiTT, et al.. Revision Risk After Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Association With Graft Processing Techniques, Patient Characteristics, and Graft Type. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(11): 2696-2705

[37] KraeutlerMJ, BravmanJT, McCartyEC. Bonepatellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(10): 2439-2448

[38] EllisHB, MathenyLM, BriggsKK, et al.. Outcomes and revision rate after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years or younger with closed physes. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(12): 1819-1825

[39] ParkSY, OhH, ParkS, et al.. Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(5): 1111-1118

[40] MagnussenRA, LawrenceJT, WestRL, et al.. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(4): 526-531