Lumbopelvic Fixation and Sacral Decompression for U-shaped Sacral Fractures: Surgical Management and Early Outcome

Abstract

U-shaped sacral fractures are rare and often difficult to diagnose primarily due to the difficulty in obtaining adequate imaging and the severe associated injuries. These fractures are highly unstable and frequently cause neurological deficits. The majority of surgeons have limited experience in management of U-shaped sacral fractures. No standard treatment protocol for U-shaped sacral fractures has been available till now. This study aimed to examine the management of U-shaped sacral fractures and the early outcomes. Clinical data of 15 consecutive patients with U-shaped sacral fracture who were admitted to our trauma center between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics, fracture classification, mechanism of injury and operative treatment and deformity angle were assessed. All the patients were treated with lumbopelvic fixation or (and) sacral decompression. EQ-5d score was applied to evaluate the patients’ quality of life. Of the 15 consecutive patients with U-shaped sacral fracture, the mean age was 28.8 years (range: 15–55 years) at the time of injury. There were 6 females and 9 males. The mean followup time was 22.7 months (range: 9 47 months) and mean full weight-bearing time was 9.9 weeks (range: 8–14 weeks). Ten patients received lumbopelvic fixation and sacral decompression, one lombosacral fixation, and 4 merely sacral decompression due to delayed diagnosis or surgery. The post-operation deformity angle (mean 27.87°, and range: 8°–90°) of the sacrum was smaller than that pre-operation (mean 35.67; range: 15–90) with no significance difference noted. At the latest follow-up, all patients obtained neurological recovery with different extents. Visual analogue score (VAS) was reduced from preoperative 7.07 (range: 5–9) to postoperetive 1.93 (range: 1–3). All patients could walk without any aid after treatment. Eight patients were able to care for themselves and undertook some daily activities. Five patients had returned to work foil time. In conclusion, lumbopelvic fixation is an effective method for stabilization of U-shaped sacral fractures with fewer complications developed. Effective reduction and firm fixation are the prerequisite of early mobilization and neurological recovery. Sacral decompression effectively promotes neurological recovery even in patients with old U-shaped sacral fractures.

Keywords

lumbopelvic fixation / sacral decompression / U-shaped / sacral fractures / neurological deficit / surgical management

References

[1] WangQ, VerrallI, WalkerR, et al.. U-type bilateral sacral fracture with spino-pelvic dissociation caused by epileptic seizure. J Surg Case Rep, 2017

[2] DeakinCD, LowJL. Accuracy of the advanced trauma life support guidelines for predicting systolic blood pressure using carotid, femoral, and radial pulses: observational study. BMJ, 2000, 321(7262): 673-674

[3] DenisF. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine, 1983, 8(8): 817-831

[4] Roy-CamilleR, SaillantG, GagnaG, et al.. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum. Suicidal jumper’s fracture. Spine, 1985, 10(9): 838-845

[5] RennieCP, BradyPC. Advances in injury severity scoring. J Emerg Nurs, 2007, 33(2): 179-181

[6] GibbonsKJ, SoloniukDS, RazackN. Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures. J Neurosurg, 1990, 72(6): 889-893

[7] SchildhauerTA, Bellabarba, NorkSE, et al.. Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(7): 447-457

[8] GribnauAJ, Van HensbroekPB, HaverlagR, et al.. U-shaped sacral fractures: surgical treatment and quality of life. Injury, 2009, 40(10): 1040-1048

[9] CearraI, AlonsoR, Martinez-OgallaD, et al.. Sacral fracture with spino-pelvic dissociation: a literature review. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 2013, 57(6): 434-442

[10] LehmanRAJr., KangDG, BellabarbaC. A new classification for complex lumbosacral injuries. Spine J, 2012, 12(7): 612-628

[11] HussinP, ChanCYW, SawLB, et al.. U-shaped sacral fracture: an easily missed fracture with high morbidity. A report of two cases. Emerg Med J, 2009, 26(9): 677-678

[12] WhiteJH, HagueC, NicolaouS, et al.. Imaging of sacral fractures. Clin Radiol, 2003, 58(12): 914-921

[13] VaccaroAR, KimDH, BrodkeDS, et al.. Diagnosis and management of sacral spine fractures. Instr Course Lect, 2004, 53(15): 375-385

[14] PorrinoJA, KohlCA, HoldenD, et al.. The importance of sagittal 2D reconstruction in pelvic and sacral trauma: Avoiding oversight of U-shaped fractures of the sacrum. Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(4): 1065-1071

[15] FardonDF. Displaced transverse fracture of the sacrum with nerve root injury: report of a case with successful operative management. J Trauma, 1979, 19(2): 119-122

[16] SchildhauerTA, Josten, MuhrG. Triangular osteosynthesis of vertically unstable sacrum fractures: a new concept allowing early weight-bearing. J Orthop Trauma, 2006

[17] SchildhauerTA, LedouxWR, ChapmanJR, et al.. Triangular osteosynthesis and iliosacral screw fixation for unstable sacral fractures: a cadaveric and biomechanical evaluation under cyclic loads. J Orthop Trauma, 2003, 17(1): 22-31

[18] RouttMLJr., SimonianPT, AgnewSG, et al.. Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(3): 171-177

[19] KalraM, AnandS. Delayed sacral laminectomy for cauda equina in a child following fracture-dislocation of sacrum. Injury, 1997, 28(8): 565-566