Effect of Cesarean Section on the Severity of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Chinese Women: The Shanxi Study

Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most adverse obstetric outcomes. Our aim is to detect the risks of multilevel PPH in different cesarean section (CS) groups [including nulliparous CS with indications, nulliparous CS without indications, repeat cesarean (RC), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), cesarean after vaginal birth (CAVB)]. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, and the data on 127 145 women collected from January 2014 to May 2016 and from 35 tertiary hospitals in Shanxi province, China, were reviewed. Based on the measuring results of PPH, an ordered logistic regression model was used to analyze the adjusted PPH risks for each of the CS groups, and comparisons were drawn between them. Finally, a total of 99 066 nulliparous (77.92%) and 28 079 multiparous (22.08%) women were observed. The number of CS cases was 61 117, and the rate for CS was 48.07%. A total of 10 029 women did not show indications for CS and accounted for 16.41% of the CS parturient, whereas 9103 women underwent a repeated cesarean, with a CS frequency of 14.89%. The number of VBAC cases was 989, whose rate was 9.88% in prior CS women. The number (proportions) of PPH was 3658 (2.88%) in LI (PPH volume: ≥900 and <1500 mL), 520 (0.41%) in 12 (PPH volume: >1500 and <2100 mL), and 201 (0.16%) in L3 (PPH volume: ≥2100 mL). The Ln (n=l, 2,3, etc.) represented the increasing order of PPH severity. In the adjusted results, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) as the reference group, in the adjusted result for nulliparous, there was a decreased PPH risk in CS with indications (OR: 2.32; CI: 2.04–2.62), which was lower than that of CS without indications (OR: 2.50; CI: 2.01–2.96). The highest PPH risk in all subgroups (i.e. nulliparous and multiparous groups) was observed in the RC (OR: 3.61; CI: 3.16–4.17), which was nearly twice higher than that of the VBAC (OR: 1.82; CI: 1.33–2.52). CAVB (OR: 1.03; CI: 0.65–1.62) showed no significant difference with the reference group. Thus, we deemed that CS should be avoided in nulliparous pregnancies unless indicated, to prevent or reduce the rates for the use of RC or VBAC which are high risks of severe PPH to the parturient women.

Keywords

postpartum hemorrhage / cesarean section / parity / indications

References

[1] SayL, ChouD, GemmillA, et al.. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health, 2014, 2(6): 323-333

[2] LiuY, WangX, ZouL, et al.. An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing. Medicine, 2017, 96(7): 5509

[3] KarlströmA, LindgrenH, HildingssonI. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study. BJOG, 2013, 120(4): 479-486

[4] Al-ZirqiI, VangenS, ForsenL, et al.. Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage. BJOG, 2008, 115(10): 1265-1272

[5] BetranAP, TorloniMR, ZhangJJ, et al.. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG, 2016, 123(5): 667-670

[6] LuoXL, ZhangWY. Obstetrical disease spectrum in China: an epidemiological study of 111, 767 cases in 2011. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(9): 1137-1146

[7] LiuX, LandonMB, ChengW, et al.. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(6): 811-817

[8] BailitJL. Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2007, 62(3): 207-213

[9] Lydon-RochelleM, HoltVL, EasterlingTR, et al.. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345(1): 3-8

[10] McMahonMJ, LutherER, BowesWJ, et al.. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335(10): 689-695

[11] RoseV. ACOG urges a cautious approach to vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am Fam Physician, 1999, 59(2): 474

[12] RozenG, UgoniAM, SheehanPM. A new perspective on VBAC: a retrospective cohort study. Women Birth, 2011

[13] LiuS, ListonRM, JosephKS, et al.. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with lowrisk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ, 2007, 176(4): 455-460

[14] LandonMB, HauthJC, LevenoKJ, et al.. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(25): 2581-2589

[15] PatelA, GoudarSS, GellerSE, et al.. Drape estimation vs. visual assessment for estimating postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006, 93(3): 220-224

[16] StaffordI, DildyGA, ClarkSL, et al.. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 199(5): 511-519

[17] MaslovitzS, BarkaiG, LessingJB, et al.. Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan, 2008, 87(9): 929-934

[18] BrileyA, SeedPT, TydemanG, et al.. Reporting errors, incidence and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage and progression to severe PPH: a prospective observational study. BJOG, 2014, 121(7): 876-888

[19] BenedettiT. Obsteric haemorrhage. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2002

[20] RobsonMS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev, 2001, 12(1): 23-39

[21] GaoY, XueQ, ChenG, et al.. An analysis of the indications for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013

[22] LumbiganonP, LaopaiboonM, GulmezogluAM, et al.. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet, 2010, 375(9713): 490-499

[23] HolmC, Langhoff-RoosJ, PetersenKB, et al.. Severe postpartum haemorrhage and mode of delivery: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG, 2012, 119(5): 596-604

[24] BoatinAA, AgabaE, NyongoziB, et al.. Stage of labor at admission among Ugandan women with a prior cesarean, and its impact on management and delivery outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2017, 139(1): 14-20

[25] GregoryKD, FridmanM, ShahS, et al.. Global measures of quality-and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200(6): 681

[26] ZengY, HeskethT. The effects of China’s universal two-child policy. Lancet, 2016, 388(10054): 1930-1938