Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes: Complete versus Incomplete Placenta Previa in Mid-pregnancy

Yun Feng , Xue-yin Li , Juan Xiao , Wei Li , Jing Liu , Xue Zeng , Xi Chen , Kai-yue Chen , Lei Fan , Qing-ling Kang , Su-hua Chen

Current Medical Science ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 597 -601.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 597 -601. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1919-9
Article

Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes: Complete versus Incomplete Placenta Previa in Mid-pregnancy

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This prospective study was conducted to compare risk factors and pregnancy outcomes between women with complete placenta previa and those with incomplete placenta previa diagnosed in mid-pregnancy. The study was carried out from April 2014 to December 2015, during which 70 patients with complete previa and 113 with incomplete previa between 20+0 weeks and 25+6 weeks of gestation were included. Maternal demographics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. Comparisons between categorical variables were tested by chi-squared test and those between continuous variables by Student t test. Resolution of previa occurred in 87.43% of the studied women. The mean gestational age at resolution was 32.1±4.4 weeks. Incidence of maternal age ≥35 years and incidence of prior uterine operation ≥3 were high in women with complete previa (28.6% vs 8.8%, P=0.003; 28.6% vs. 8.8%, P=0.003). Resolution of previa occurred less often in complete previa group (74.3% vs. 95.6%, P=0.001). Women with complete previa admitted earlier (37.3±2.0 weeks 38.1±1.4 weeks, P=0.011) and delivered earlier (37.7±1.2 weeks vs. 38.3±1.4 weeks, P=0.025). Maternal age ≥35 years and prior uterine operation ≥3 increase the risk of complete previa in mid-pregnancy. Placenta previa is more likely to persist in women with complete previa than those with incomplete previa diagnosed in midpregnancy. What is more, women with complete previa in mid-pregnancy delivers earlier.

Keywords

complete placenta previa / risk factor / uterine operation / pregnancy outcome / resolution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yun Feng, Xue-yin Li, Juan Xiao, Wei Li, Jing Liu, Xue Zeng, Xi Chen, Kai-yue Chen, Lei Fan, Qing-ling Kang, Su-hua Chen. Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes: Complete versus Incomplete Placenta Previa in Mid-pregnancy. Current Medical Science, 2018, 38(4): 597-601 DOI:10.1007/s11596-018-1919-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WexlerP, GottesfeldKR. Early diagnosis of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol, 1979, 54(2): 231-234

[2]

BeckerRH, VonkR, MendeBC, et al.. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 17(6): 496-501

[3]

TuzovicL. Complete versus incomplete placenta previa and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006, 93(2): 110-117

[4]

DolaC, GariteTJ, DowlingDD, et al.. Placenta previa: does its type affect pregnancy outcome?. Am J Perinatol, 2003, 20(7): 353-360

[5]

GorodeskiIG, BahariCM. The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal-neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med, 1987, 15(2): 169-177

[6]

MorganJ. Placenta praevia: report on a series of 538 cases (1938–1962). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 1965, 72(5): 700-705

[7]

CrenshawJr, JonesDE, ParkerRT, et al.. Placenta previa: a survey of twenty years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1973, 28(7): 461-470

[8]

CottonDB, ReadJA, PaulRH, et al.. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1980, 137(6): 687-695

[9]

DasheJS, MclntireDD, RamusRM, et al.. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol, 2002692-697

[10]

SalkerM, TeklenburgG, MolokhiaM, et al.. Natural selection of human embryos: impaired decidualization of endometrium disables embryomaternal interactions and causes recurrent pregnancy loss. Plos One, 2010el0287

[11]

ChoJY, LeeYH, MoonMH, et al.. Difference in migration of placenta according to the location and type of placenta previa. J Clin Ultras, 2008, 36(2): 79-84

[12]

KingDL. Placental migration demonstrated by ultrasonography. A hypothesis of dynamic placentation. Radiology, 1973, 109(1): 167-170

[13]

VarmaTR. The implication of a low implantation of the placenta detected by ultrasonography in early pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1981, 60(3): 265-268

[14]

DebskiR, MakuchK. Ultrasonographic assessment of changes in the location of the lower border (termed migration) of the placenta. Wiadomosci lekarskie, 1990, 43(11): 506-510

[15]

LiWZ, YongTZ. Continuous ultrasonic observation on the change of location of placenta in placenta previa. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi (Chinese), 1990, 25(6): 335-336

[16]

GreenJR. Placenta previa and abruptio placenta, 1994, ResnikR, (eds) Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, Creasy RK

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

131

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/