Clinical Assessment of Differential Diagnostic Methods in Infants with Cholestasis due to Biliary Atresia or Non-Biliary Atresia

Chen Dong , Hui-yun Zhu , Yun-chao Chen , Xiao-ping Luo , Zhi-hua Huang

Current Medical Science ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1) : 137 -143.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1) : 137 -143. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1857-6
Article

Clinical Assessment of Differential Diagnostic Methods in Infants with Cholestasis due to Biliary Atresia or Non-Biliary Atresia

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The different methods in differentiating biliary atresia (BA) from non-BA-related cholestasis were evaluated in order to provide a practical basis for a rapid, early and accurate differential diagnosis of the diseases. 396 infants with cholestatic jaundice were studied prospectively during the period of May 2007 to June 2011. The liver function in all subjects was tested. All cases underwent abdominal ultrasonography and duodenal fluid examination. Most cases were subjected to hepatobiliary scintigraphy, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and a percutaneous liver biopsy. The diagnosis of BA was finally made by cholangiography or histopathologic examination. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of these various methods were compared. 178 patients (108 males and 70 females with a mean age of 58±30 days) were diagnosed as having BA. 218 patients (136 males and 82 females with a mean age of 61 ±24 days) were diagnosed as having non-BA etiologies of cholestasis jaundice during the follow-up period in which jaundice faded after treatment with medical therapy. For diagnosis of BA, clinical evaluation, hepatomegaly, stool color, serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), duodenal juice color, bile acid in duodenal juice, ultrasonography (gallbladder), ultrasonography (griangular cord or strip-apparent hyperechoic foci), hepatobiliary scintigraphy, MRCP, liver biopsy had an accuracy of 76.0%, 51.8%, 84.3%, 70.0%, 92.4%, 98.0%, 90.4%, 67.2%, 85.3%, 83.2% and 96.6%, a sensitivity of 83.1%, 87.6%, 96.1%, 73.7%, 90.4%, 100%, 92.7%, 27.5%, 100%, 89.0% and 97.4%, a specificity of 70.2%, 77.5%, 74.8%, 67.0%, 94.0%, 96.3%, 88.5%, 99.5%, 73.3%, 75.4% and 94.3%, a positive predictive value of 69.0%, 72.6%, 75.7%, 64.6%, 92.5%, 95.7%, 86.8%, 98.0%, 75.4%, 82.6% and 98.0%, and a negative predictive value of 83.6%, 8.5%, 95.9%, 75.7%, 92.3%, 100%, 84.2%, 93.7%, 100%, 84.0% and 92.6%, respectively. It was concluded that all the differential diagnosis methods are useful. The test for duodenal drainage and elements is fast and accurate. It is helpful in the differential diagnosis of BA and non-BA etiologies of cholestasis. It shows good practical value clinically.

Keywords

neonatal cholestasis / biliary atresia / non-biliary atresia etiologies of cholestasis / jaundice

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chen Dong, Hui-yun Zhu, Yun-chao Chen, Xiao-ping Luo, Zhi-hua Huang. Clinical Assessment of Differential Diagnostic Methods in Infants with Cholestasis due to Biliary Atresia or Non-Biliary Atresia. Current Medical Science, 2018, 38(1): 137-143 DOI:10.1007/s11596-018-1857-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

MoyerV, FreeseDK, WhitingtonPF, et al.. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2004, 39(2): 115-128

[2]

MowatAP, PsacharopoulosHT, WilliamsR. Extrahepatic biliary atresia versus neonatal hepatitis. Review of 137 prospectively investigated infants. Arch Dis Child, 1976, 51(10): 763-770

[3]

FawazR, BaumannU, EkongU, et al.. Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice in Infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2017, 64(1): 154-168

[4]

BalistreriWF. Neonatal cholestasis. J Pediatr, 1985, 106(2): 171-184

[5]

McKiernanPJ. Neonatal cholestasis. Semin Neonatal, 2002, 7(2): 153-165

[6]

MartinSR, AtkisonP, AnandR, et al.. Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation 2002: patient and graft survival and rejection in pediatric recipients of a first liver transplant in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Transplant, 2004, 8(3): 273-283

[7]

DevictorD, TissieresP. Pediatric liver transplantation: where do we stand? Where we are going to?. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 7(7): 629-641

[8]

HollonJ, EideM, GormanG. Early diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia in an open-access medical system. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49 643

[9]

MuraseN, UchidaH, OnoY, et al.. A New era of laparoscopic revision of Kasai portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015: 173 014

[10]

RafeeyM, SaboktakinL, ShoaHassaniJ, et al.. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and apo-e in extrahepatic biliary atresia. Iran J Pediatr, 2014, 24(5): 623-629

[11]

MadsenSS, KvistN, ThorupJ. Increased conjugated bilirubin is sufficient to initiate screening for biliary atresia. Dan Med J, 2015, 62(8): A5114

[12]

LuFT, WuJF, HsuHY, et al.. Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase level as a screening marker among diverse etiologies of infantile intrahepatic cholestasis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2014, 59(6): 695-701

[13]

DehghaniSM, HaghighatM, ImaniehMH, et al.. Comparison of different diagnostic methods in infants with cholestasis. World J Gastroenterol, 2006, 12(36): 5893-5896

[14]

PLoS One, 2014, 9(2):

[15]

DavenportM. Biliary atresia. Semin Pediatr Surg, 2005, 14(1): 42-48

[16]

SinhaCK, DavenportM. Biliary atresia. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, 2008, 13(2): 49-56

[17]

McKiernanPJ, BakerAJ, KellyDA. The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet, 2000, 355(9197): 25-29

[18]

HoerningA, RaubS, DecheneA, et al.. Diversity of disorders causing neonatal cholestasis~the experience of a tertiary pediatric center in Germany. Front-Pediatr, 2014, 2(65): 3389

[19]

ShneiderBL, BrownMB, HaberB, et al.. Amulticenter study of the outcome of biliary atresia in the United States. 1997 to 2000. J Pediatr, 2006, 148(4): 467-474

[20]

Larrosa-HaroA, Caro-LopezAM, Coello-RamirezP, et al.. Duodenal tube test in the diagnosis of biliaryatresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2001, 32(3): 311-315

[21]

BenchimolEI, WalshCM, LingSC. Early diagnosis of neonatal cholestatic jaundice: test at 2 weeks. Can Fam Physician, 2009, 55(12): 1184-1192

[22]

StipsanelliK, KoutsikosJ, PapantoniouV, et al.. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy and gamma-GT levels in the differential diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2007, 51(1): 74-81

[23]

JawTS, KuoYT, LiuGC, et al.. MR cholangiography in the evaluation of neonatal cholestasis. Radiology, 1999, 212(1): 249-256

[24]

NortonKI, GlassRB, KoganD, et al.. MR cholangiography in the evaluation of neonatal cholestasis: initial results. Radiology, 2002, 222(3): 687-691

[25]

OhhamaY, ShinkaiM, FujitaS, et al.. Early prediction of long-term survival and the timing of liver transplantation after the Kasai operation. J Pediatr Surg, 2000, 35(7): 1031

[26]

KahnE. Biliary atresia revisited. Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2004, 7(2): 109-124

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

129

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/