The value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Zhen Zeng , Shu-ping Ding , Xue Zeng , Sui Cao , Ling-yu Wei , Yan-yan Liu , Fu-yan Yang , Jing-ji Gong , Han-ping Chen , Xiao-yan Xu

Current Medical Science ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 536 -540.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 536 -540. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-017-1769-x
Article

The value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The clinical value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) was evaluated. The clinical data of 104 patients with CSP admitted at Tongji Hospital from 2013 to 2016 were collected and analyzed retrospectively, including the patients’ age, gestational age, the size of gestational sac or uneven mass, the uterine scar thickness, β human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels and so on. Of these 104 cases, 30 cases were subjected to laparotomy, 29 cases to laparoscopy, 27 cases to hysteroscopy, 16 cases to ultrasound-guided uterine curettage, and 2 cases to conservative treatment. The transvaginal ultrasound showed that uterine scar thickness and gestational sac or uneven mass size had significant difference (P<0.05) among different surgical methods by comparatively analyzing the patients’ data. It was suggested that transvaginal ultrasound may provide the valuable reference for choosing clinical surgical procedures for CSP.

Keywords

transvaginal ultrasound / cesarean scar pregnancy / clinical surgical treatment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhen Zeng, Shu-ping Ding, Xue Zeng, Sui Cao, Ling-yu Wei, Yan-yan Liu, Fu-yan Yang, Jing-ji Gong, Han-ping Chen, Xiao-yan Xu. The value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Current Medical Science, 2017, 37(4): 536-540 DOI:10.1007/s11596-017-1769-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ChengLY, WangCB, ChuLC, et al. . Outcomes of primary surgical evacuation during the first trimester in different types of implantation in women with cesarean scar pregnancy. Fert Steril, 2014, 102(4): 1085-1090

[2]

PengP, GuiT, LiuX, et al. . Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2015, 11: 137-142 PMID: 25670903 PMCID: 4315462

[3]

Timor-TritschIE, MonteagudoA, CaliG, et al. . Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43(4): 383-395 PMID: 24357257

[4]

AshA, SmithA, MaxwellD. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG, 2007, 114(3): 253-263 PMID: 17313383

[5]

FylstraDL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(8): 537-543 PMID: 12187153

[6]

ElsonCJ, SalimR, PotdarN, et al. . Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG, 2016, 123(13): e15-e55

[7]

RotasMA, HabermanS, LevgurM. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(6): 1373-1381 PMID: 16738166

[8]

VialY, PetignatP, HohlfeldP. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(6): 592-593 PMID: 11169360

[9]

Timor-TritschIE, MonteagudoA, SantosR, et al. . The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207: 44 PMID: 22607667

[10]

Timor-TritschIE, MonteagudoA. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(1): 14-29 PMID: 22516620

[11]

LarsenJV, SolomonMH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus—an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afri Med, 1978, 53(4): 142-143

[12]

KangSY, ParkBJ, KimYW, et al. . Surgical management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: hysterotomy by transvaginal approach. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(1): e25-e28 PMID: 21550036

[13]

XiaoJ, ZhangS, WangF, et al. . Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(4): 356.e1-7

[14]

LamPM, LoKW, LauTK. Unsuccessful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with systemic methotrexate: a report of two cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2004, 83(1): 108-111 PMID: 14678094

[15]

WangCB, TsengCJ. Primary evacuation therapy for cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(2): 222-226 PMID: 16323153

[16]

GodinPA, BassilS, DonnezJ. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril, 1997, 67(2): 398-400 PMID: 9022622

[17]

MaymonR, HalperinR, MendlovicS, et al. . Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update, 2004, 10(6): 515-523 PMID: 15375087

[18]

SeowKM, HuangLW, LinYH, et al. . Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(3): 247-253 PMID: 15027012

[19]

ShenL, TanA, ZhuH, et al. . Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(5): 386.e1-e6

[20]

Sevket O, Keskin S, Ates S, et al. Is methotrexate administration needed for the treatment of caesarean section scar pregnancy in addition to suction curettage? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, 2014,19(2):128–133

[21]

JurkovicD, KnezJ, AppiahA, et al. . Surgical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(4): 511-517 PMID: 26764166

[22]

FangAH, ChenQF, QianZX, et al. . Correlation questions clinical discussion of uterine artery embolization in induced abortion patients with management of cesarean scar pregnancy. J Reprod Contracept, 2009, 20(3): 153-160

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

103

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/