Correlation of enhancement degree on contrast-enhanced ultrasound with histopathology of carotid plaques and serum high sensitive C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the correlation of the enhancement degree on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with the histopathology of carotid plaques and the serum high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Carotid CEUS was performed preoperatively in 115 patients who would undergo CEA, and the enhancement degree of the carotid plaques was evaluated by both the visual semiquantitative analysis and the quantitative time-intensity curve analysis. Serum hs-CRP levels were detected using the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay also before the operation. Additionally, the carotid plaque samples were subjected to histopathological examination postoperatively. The density of neovessels and the number of macrophages in the plaques were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The results showed that among the 115 patients, grade 0 plaque contrast enhancement was noted in 35 patients, grade 1 in 48 patients and grade 2 in 32 patients. The degree of plaque enhancement, the density of neovessels, the number of macrophages, and the hs-CRP levels were highest in the grade 2 patients. Correlation analysis showed that the enhancement degree of the carotid plaques was closely related to the immunohistochemical parameters of the plaques and the serum hs-CRP levels. It was suggested that the carotid plaque enhancement on CEUS can be used to evaluate the vulnerability of carotid plaques.

Keywords

carotid plaque / neovascularization / contrast-enhanced ultrasound / carotid endarterectomy / high sensitive C-reactive protein

References

[1] BurkeAP, FarbA, MalcomGT, et al. . Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med, 1997, 336(18): 1276-1282 PMID: 9113930

[2] DaviesMJ. The pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes. Heart, 2000, 83(3): 361-366 PMID: 10677422 PMCID: 1729334

[3] FalkE, ShahPK, FusterV. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation, 1995, 92(3): 657-671 PMID: 7634481

[4] LeeRT, LibbyP. The unstable atheroma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 1997, 17(10): 1859-1867 PMID: 9351346

[5] SpagnoliLG, MaurielloA S, et al. . Extracranialthrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. JAMA, 2004, 292(15): 1845-1852 PMID: 15494582

[6] SchaarJA, MullerJE, FalkE, et al. . Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(12): 1077-1082 PMID: 15191780

[7] HellingsWE, PeetersW, MollFL, et al. . Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome. A prognostic study. Circulation, 2010, 121(17): 1941-1950 PMID: 20404256

[8] KrupinskiJ, TuruMM, Martinez-GonzalezJ, et al. . Endogenousexpression of C-reactive protein is increased in active human carotid artery plaques. Stroke, 2006, 37: 1200-1204 PMID: 16601222

[9] XiongL, DengYB, ZhuY e a1. Correlation of carotid plaqueneovascularization detected by using contrast enhanced US with clinical symptoms. Radiology, 2009, 251(2): 583-589 PMID: 19304920

[10] ZhuY, DengYB, LiuYN, et al. . Use of carotid plaque neovascularization at contrast enhanced US to predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. Radiology, 2013, 268(1): 54-60 PMID: 23440321

[11] XiongL, LiP, ZhaoBW. Evaluation of carotid plaque neovascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2014, 34(1): 29-32 PMID: 24496675

[12] SchinkelAFL, KruegerCG, TellezA, et al. . Contrast enhanced ultrasound for imaging vasa vasorum: comparison with histopathology in a swine model of atherosclerosis. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2010, 11(8): 659-664 PMID: 20385655

[13] SunJ, LiuK, TangQY, et al. . Correlation between enhanced intensity of atherosclerotic plaque at contrast enhanced ultrasound and density of histological neovascularization. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2013, 33(3): 443-446 PMID: 23771675

[14] MüllerHFG, ViaccozA, KuzmanovicI, et al. . Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging of carotid plaque neovascularization: accuracy of visual analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014, 40(1): 18-24 PMID: 24139919

[15] ColiS, MagnoniM, SangiorgiG, et al. . Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 52(3): 223-230 PMID: 18617072

[16] MorenoPR. Pathophysiology of plaque disruption and thrombosis in acute ischemic syndromes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2001, 10: 2-9 PMID: 17903843

[17] DaviesMJ, RichardsonPD, WoolfN, et al. . Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: Role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. Br Heart J, 1993, 69: 377-381 PMID: 8518056 PMCID: 1025095

[18] GabayC, KushnerL. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(6): 448-454 PMID: 9971870

[19] BlackS, KushnerI, SamolsD. C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem, 2004, 279(47): 48487-48490 PMID: 15337754

[20] Molino-LovaR, MacchiC, GoriAM, et al. . High sensitive C-reactive protein predicts the development of new carotid artery plaques in older persons. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2011, 21(10): 776-782 PMID: 20554169

[21] KrupinskiJ, TuruMM, Martinez-GonzalezJ, et al. . Endogenous expression of C-reactive protein is increased in active human carotid artery plaques. Stroke, 2006, 37(5): 1200-1204 PMID: 16601222