Assessment of complications after liver surgery: Two novel grading systems applied to patients undergoing hepatectomy

Abstract

Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. The absence of a definition and a widely accepted ranking system to classify surgical complications has hampered proper interpretation of the surgical outcome. This study aimed to define and search the simple and reproducible classification of complications following hepatectomy based on two therapy-oriented severity grading system: Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications and Accordion severity grading of postoperative complications. Two classifications were tested in a cohort of 2008 patients who underwent elective liver surgery at our institution between January 1986 and December 2005. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to link respective complications with perioperative parameters, length of hospital stay and the quality of life. A total of 1716 (85.46%) patients did not develop any complication, while 292 (14.54%) patients had at least one complication. According to Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications system, grade I complications occurred in 150 patients (7.47%), grade II in 47 patients (2.34%), grade IIIa in 59 patients (2.94%), grade IIIb in 13 patients (0.65%), grade IVa in 7 patients (0.35%), grade IVb in 1 patient (0.05%), and grade V in 15 patients (0.75%). According to Accordion severity grading of postoperative complications system, mild complications occurred in 160 patients (7.97%), moderate complications in 48 patients (2.39%), severe complications (invasive procedure/no general anesthesia) in 48 patients (2.39%), severe complications (invasive procedure under general anesthesia or single organ system failure) in 20 patients (1.00%), severe complications (organ system failure and invasive procedure under general anesthesia or multisystem organ failure) in 1 patient (0.05%), and mortality was 0.75% (n=15). Complication severity of Clavien-Dindo system and Accordion system were all correlated with the length of hospital stay, the number of hepatic segments resected, the blood transfusion and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). The Clavien-Dindo classification system and Accordion classification system are the simple ways of reporting all complications following the liver surgery.

Keywords

classification / complication / quality of life / liver / hepatectomy

References

[1] AndreouA, VautheyJN, CherquiD, et al. . International Cooperative Study Group on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Improved long-term survival after major resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis based on a new definition of major hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(1): 66-77 PMID: 22948836

[2] JinS, FuQ, WuyunG, et al. . Management of post-hepatectomy complications. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(44): 7983-7991 PMID: 24307791 PMCID: 3848145

[3] HardyKJ. Liver surgery: the past 2000 years. Aust N Z J Surg, 1990, 60(10): 811-817 PMID: 2206121

[4] TanabeKK. The past 60 years in liver surgery. Cancer, 2008, 113: 1888-1896 PMID: 18798530

[5] RisF, MajnoP, MorelP, et al. . Complex liver resections: where are the limits?. Rev Med Suisse (French), 2008, 4(163): 1558-1562

[6] DeOliveiraML, WinterJM, SchaferM, et al. . Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(6): 931-937 PMID: 17122618 PMCID: 1856636

[7] HuangZQ, XuLN, YangT, et al. . Hepatic resection: an analysis of the impact of operative and perioperative factors on the morbidity and mortality rate. Chin Med J, 2009, 122(19): 2268-2277 PMID: 20079125

[8] KochM, GardenOJ, PadburyR, et al. . Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery, 2011, 149(5): 680-688 PMID: 21316725

[9] MentulaPJ, LeppäniemiAK. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg, 2014, 8(1): 31 PMID: 25075222 PMCID: 4114794

[10] PorembkaMR, HallBL, HirbeM, et al. . Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg, 2010, 210(3): 286-298 PMID: 20193891

[11] VollmerC J, LewisRS, HallBL, et al. . Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(3): 527-536 PMID: 25268299

[12] DindoD, DemartinesN, ClavienPA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213 PMID: 15273542 PMCID: 1360123

[13] StrasbergSM, LinehanDC, HawkinsWG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 177-186 PMID: 19638919

[14] StrasbergSM, HallBL. Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications. J Am Coll Surg, 2011, 213(5): 616-626 PMID: 21871822

[15] de VriesEN, PrinsHA, CrollaRM, et al. . SURPASS Collaborative Group. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363(20): 1928-1937 PMID: 21067384

[16] CesconM, VetroneG, GraziGL, et al. . Trends in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1500 consecutive unselected cases over 20 years. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(6): 995-1002 PMID: 19474679

[17] YangT, ZhangJ, LuJH, et al. . Risk factors influencing postoperative outcomes of major hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying liver diseases. World J Surg, 2011, 35(9): 2073-2082 PMID: 21656309

[18] SajidMS, IftikharM, RimpleJ, et al. . Use of health-related quality of life tools in hepatobiliary surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2008, 7(2): 135-137 PMID: 18397846

[19] GandhiS, KhubchandaniS, IyerR. Quality of life and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014, 5(4): 296-317 PMID: 25083303 PMCID: 4110497

[20] dos SantosDC, LimongiV, de Oliveira da SilvaAM, et al. . Evaluation of functional status, pulmonary capacity, body composition, and quality of life of end-stage liver disease patients who are candidates for liver surgery. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(6): 1771-1774 PMID: 25131033

[21] ToroA, PulvirentiE, PalermoF, et al. . Health-related quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or no treatment. Surg Oncol, 2012, 21(1): e23-e30 PMID: 22104002

[22] KamphuesC, EngelS, DeneckeT, et al. . Safety of liver resection and effect on quality of life in patients with benign hepatic disease: single center experience. BMC Surg, 2011, 11: 16 PMID: 21791063 PMCID: 3163509

[23] BrunsH, KrätschmerK, HinzU, et al. . Quality of life after curative liver resection: a single center analysis. World J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(19): 2388-2395 PMID: 20480524 PMCID: 2874143

[24] PritchardMJ. Using the hospital anxiety and depression scale in surgical patients. Nurs Stand, 2011, 25(34): 35-41

[25] FongTC, HoRT. Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Qual Life Res, 2013, 22(10): 2857-2863 PMID: 23670233