Early osseointegration of implants with cortex-like TiO₂ coatings formed by micro-arc oxidation: A histomorphometric study in rabbits

Abstract

In our previous studies, a novel cortex-like TiO₂ coating was prepared on Ti surface through micro-arc oxidation (MAO) by using sodium tetraborate as electrolyte, and the effects of the coating on cell attachment were testified. This study aimed to investigate the effects of this cortex-like MAO coating on osseointegration. A sand-blasting and acid-etching (SLA) coating that has been widely used in clinical practice served as control. Topographical and chemical characterizations were conducted by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer, X-ray diffraction, contact angle meter, and step profiler. Results showed that the cortex-like coating had microslots and nanopores and it was superhydrophilic, whereas the SLA surface was hydrophobic. The roughness of MAO was similar to that of SLA. The MAO and SLA implants were implanted into the femoral condyles of New Zealand rabbits to evaluate their in-vivo performance through micro-CT, histological analysis, and fluorescent labeling at the bone-implant interface four weeks after surgery. The micro-CT showed that the bone volume ratio and mean trabecular thickness were similar between MAO and SLA groups four weeks after implantation. Histological analysis and fluorescent labeling showed no significant differences in the bone-implant contact between the MAO and SLA surfaces. It was suggested that with micro/nanostructure and superhydrophilicity, the cortex-like MAO coating causes excellent osseointegration, holding a promise of an application to implant modification.

Keywords

titanium implant / micro-arc oxidation / cortex-like structure / osseointegration / histomorphometry

References

[1] TrevesC, MartinesiM, StioM, et al. . In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of surface-modified titanium alloys. J BiomedMater Res A, 2010, 92(4): 1623-1634

[2] CuiWF, JinL, ZhouL. Surface characteristics and electrochemical corrosion behavior of a pre-anodized microarc oxidation coating on titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2013, 33(7): 3775-3779 PMID: 23910276

[3] HuHJ, LiuXY, DingCX. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of nanostructured TiO₂/TCP composite coating by plasma electrolytic oxidation. J Alloy Compd, 2010, 498(2): 172-178

[4] HallabNJ, AndersonS, StaffordT, et al. . Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res, 2005, 23(2): 384-391 PMID: 15734252

[5] MaWH, LiuYJ, WangW, et al. . Improved biological performance of magnesium by micro-arc oxidation. Braz J Med Bio Res, 2015, 48(3): 214-225

[6] WangW, WanP, LiuC, et al. . Degradation and biological properties of Ca–P contained micro-arc oxidation self-sealing coating on pure magnesium for bone fixation. Regenerative Biomater, 2015, 2(2): 107-118

[7] Rivera-ChaconDM, Alvarado-VelezM, Acevedo-MorantesCY, et al. . Fibronectin and vitronectin promote human fetal osteoblast cell attachment and proliferation on nanoporous titanium surfaces. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 2013, 9(6): 1092-1097 PMID: 23858975 PMCID: 3718483

[8] GuyerRD, AbitbolJJ, OhnmeissDD, et al. . Evaluating osseointegration into a deeply porous titanium scaffold: a biomechanical comparison with PEEK and allograft. Spine, 2016, 41(19): E1146-1150 PMID: 27135643

[9] Santiago-MedinaP, SundaramPA, Diffoot-CarloN. The effects of micro-arc oxidation of gamma titanium aluminide surfaces on osteoblast adhesion and differentiation. J Mater Sci-mater M, 2014, 25(6): 1577-1587

[10] LiuW, ChengM, WahafuT, et al. . The in vitro and in vivo performance of a strontium-containing coating on the low-modulus Ti35Nb2Ta3Zr alloy formed by micro-arc oxidation. J Mater Sci-mater M, 2015, 26(7): 1-13

[11] JingW, ZhangM, JinL, et al. . Assessment of osteoinduction using a porous hydroxyapatite coating prepared by micro-arc oxidation on a new titanium alloy. Int J Surg, 2015, 24: 51-56 PMID: 26306772

[12] LiuZF, WangWQ, LiuHY, et al. . Formation and characterization of titania coatings with cortex-like slots formed on Ti by micro-arc oxidation treatment. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 266: 250-255

[13] ParkJW. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2013, 24: 145-151

[14] OwensDK, WendtR. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci, 1969, 13(8): 1741-1747

[15] BrånemarkR, EmanuelssonL, PalmquistA, et al. . Bone response to laser-induced micro-and nano-size titanium surface features. Nanomedine, 2011, 7(2): 220-227

[16] BitschnauA, AltV, BöhnerF, et al. . Comparison of new bone formation, implant integration, and biocompatibility between RGD-hydroxyapatite and pure hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses—an experimental study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2009, 88(1): 66-74 PMID: 18615683

[17] FuhLJ, HuangHL, ChenCS, et al. . Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil, 2010, 37(5): 346-351 PMID: 20113389

[18] VilmannH. The in vivo staining of bone with alizarin red S. J Anat, 1969, 105(3): 533-545 PMID: 4187091 PMCID: 1232189

[19] WennerbergA, GalliS, AlbrektssonT. Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmet Inves Dent, 2011, 3(1): 59-67

[20] JuanB, ElenaA, FernoM, et al. . Influence on early osseointegration of dental implants installed with two different drilling protocols: a histomorphometric study in rabbit. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2011, 22(1): 92-99

[21] SalemNA, Abo TalebAL, AboushelibMN. et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(4): 261-267 PMID: 23107438

[22] MatosM A F P FB. Histomorphometric evaluation of bone healing in rabbit fibular osteotomy model without fixation. J Orthop Sur Res, 2008, 3(1): 1

[23] KopfBS, SchipanskiA, RottmarM, et al. . Enhanced differentiation of human osteoblasts on Ti surfaces pre-treated with human whole blood. Acta Biomater, 2015, 19: 180-190 PMID: 25818948

[24] LeeHR, KimHJ, KoJS, et al. . Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e84272 PMID: 24391927 PMCID: 3877265

[25] WangN, LiHY, LüWL, et al. . Effects of TiO₂ nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomater, 2011, 32(29): 6900-6911

[26] Polo-CorralesL, Latorre-EstevesM, Ramirez-VickJE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2014, 14(1): 15-56 PMID: 24730250 PMCID: 3997175

[27] Al-NawasB, GroetzKA, GoetzH, et al. . Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2008, 19(1): 1-8

[28] KohJW, KimYS, YangJH, et al. . Effects of a calcium phosphate-coated and anodized titanium surface on early bone response. Int J Oral Maxil Implan, 2013, 28(3): 790-797

[29] JungUW, ChoiJY, KimCS, et al. . Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: a 5-year comparative study. J Periodontol, 2008, 79(10): 1857-1863 PMID: 18834239

[30] LaiHC, ZhuangLF, LiuX, et al. . The influence of surface energy on early adherent events of osteoblast on titanium substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2010, 93(1): 289-296 PMID: 19562750

[31] CutiongcoMFA, AndersonDEJ, HindsMT, et al. . In vitro and ex vivo hemocompatibility of off-the-shelf modified poly(vinyl alcohol) vascular grafts. Acta Biomater, 2015, 25: 97-108 PMID: 26225735 PMCID: 4762273

[32] KopfBS, RuchS, BernerS, et al. . The role of nanostructures and hydrophilicity in osseointegration: in vitro protein-adsorption and blood-interaction studies. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2015, 103(8): 2661-2672 PMID: 25631679

[33] ZhangL, NingC, TengW, et al. . Comparison of platelet adhesion behavior on pure titanium surfaces modified by different techniques. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi (Chinese), 2015, 50(9): 565-569

[34] WennerbergA, JimboR, StubingerS, et al. . Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2014, 25(9): 1041-1050

[35] JimboR, OnoD, HirakawaY, et al. . Accelerated photo-induced hydrophilicity promotes osseointegration: an animal study. Clin Implan Dent Relat Res, 2011, 13(1): 79-85

[36] GoldmanM, JuodzbalysG, VilkinisV. Titanium surfaces with nanostructures influence on osteoblasts proliferation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxil Res, 2014, 5(3): e1

[37] KokkinosPA, KoutsoukosPG, DeligianniDD. Detachment strength of human osteoblasts cultured on hydroxyapatite with various surface roughness. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2012, 23(6): 1489-1498 PMID: 22484862

[38] ChenHT, ChungCJ, YangTC, et al. . Microscopic observations of osteoblast growth on micro-arc oxidized beta titanium. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 266: 73-80

[39] TsouHK, ChiMH, HungYW, et al. . In vivo osseointegration performance of titanium dioxide coating modified polyetheretherketone using arc ion plating for spinal implant application. BioMed Res Int, 2015, 2015: 328943 PMID: 26504800 PMCID: 4609364

[40] ZhouJ, HanY. Effect of hydrothermal treatment model on the formation of Sr–HA nanorod arrays on microarc oxidized titania coatings. Appl Surf Sci, 2013, 286: 384-390

[41] TsouHK, HsiehPY, ChiMH, et al. . Improved osteoblast compatibility of medical-grade polyetheretherketone using arc ionplated rutile/anatase titanium dioxide films for spinal implants. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2012, 100(10): 2787-2792 PMID: 22623173