Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity

Xiao-bo Feng , Cao Yang , De-hao Fu , Shu-nan Ye , Xian-zhe Liu , Zhe Chen , Saroj Rai , Shu-hua Yang

Current Medical Science ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 231 -236.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 231 -236. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1572-0
Article

Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasy (TKA) with use of NexGen® Legacy® Constrained Condylar Knee (CCK) prosthesis for severe knee deformity. Clinical data of 46 patients (48 knees in total, aged 61 years on average) with severe knee deformity who underwent TKA with NexGen® Legacy® CCK prosthesis between December 2007 and February 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 knees with severe valgus with incompetent medial collateral ligament, 11 knees with severe flexion contracture with inability to achieve knee balancing in flexion and extension by posterior soft tissue release, 2 knees with Charcot arthritis with severe varus and bone loss, and 1 with traumatic osteoarthritis with severe varus and ligamentous instability. The mean duration of follow-up was 71 months (range 40–90 months). The New Knee Society scoring (NKSS) system and the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were used to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain measurement and Knee Society criteria for evaluation of radiological images. The results showed that, in the total 48 knees, 1 case of loosening due to short-stem tibial component at 3 months post-operatively underwent revision. The 6-year prosthesis survival rate in this cohort was 97.9%. There was no component infection occurring within 6 years. Significant post-operative improvements were found in NKSS and HSS scores. Patient satisfaction was significantly increased. Pain score was decreased significantly. Total functional score was improved from 31.46±11.43 to 86.42±8.87, range of motion (ROM) from 42.42°±23.57° to 95.31°±23.45° and the flexion contracture from 5.31°±7.87° to 0.92°±1.80°. Preoperative radiographic study showed excessive valgus (≥7°) in 37 knees, and varus deformity in 3 knees. Post-operative femorotibial alignment was valgus 3.88°±1.76° in 48 knees. Antero/posterior (A/P) view of X-ray films showed 4 radiolucent lines (RLL) in 48 tibial components. It was concluded that TKA with CCK is effective for the treatment of the severe unstable knee that cannot be balanced by soft tissue.

Keywords

constrained condylar knee / total knee arthroplasy / New Knee Society score / Hospital for Special Surgery score / severe deformity of knee

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiao-bo Feng, Cao Yang, De-hao Fu, Shu-nan Ye, Xian-zhe Liu, Zhe Chen, Saroj Rai, Shu-hua Yang. Mid-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for severe knee deformity. Current Medical Science, 2016, 36(2): 231-236 DOI:10.1007/s11596-016-1572-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

SculcoTP. The role of constraint in total knee arthoplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(4): 54-56 PMID: 16781430

[2]

HartfordJM, GoodmanSB, SchurmanDJ, et al. . Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(4): 380-387 PMID: 9645517

[3]

InsallJN, ScuderiGR, KomistekRD, et al. . Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, 10(403): 143-152

[4]

MorganH, BattistaV, LeopoldS. Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2005, 13(8): 515-124 PMID: 16330513

[5]

CholewinskiP, PutmanS, VasseurL, et al. . Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(4): 449-454 PMID: 25952710

[6]

SullivanM, TanzerM, ReardonG, et al. . The role of presurgical expectancies in predicting pain and function one year following total knee arthroplasty. Pain, 2011, 152(10): 2287-2293 PMID: 21764515

[7]

EasleyME, InsallJN, ScuderiGR, et al. . Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for the arthritic valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, 380: 58-64 PMID: 11064973

[8]

KimYH, ParkJW, KimJS, et al. . Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(10): 1804-9 PMID: 25953383

[9]

KingBR, GladnickBP, LeeYY, et al. . Range of motion and function are not affected by increased post constraint in patients undergoing posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2014, 21(1): 194-198 PMID: 23899650

[10]

AndersonJA, BaldiniA, MacDonaldJH, et al. . Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty without stem extensions for the valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 442: 199-203 PMID: 16394761

[11]

YooJD, KimNK. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2015, 27(1): 1-9 PMID: 25750888 PMCID: 4349639

[12]

ZhouX, WangM, LiuC, et al. . Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus knee deformity. Chin Med J (Engl), 2014, 127(6): 1062-1066

[13]

MaynardLM, SauberTJ, KostopoulosVK, et al. . Survival of primary condylar-constrained total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 7 years. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(6): 1197-1201 PMID: 24411081

[14]

NoblePC1, CondittMA, CookKF, et al. . The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 452: 35-43 PMID: 16967035

[15]

LingardEA, SledgeCB, LearmonthID, et al. . Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(6): 1201-1207 PMID: 16757751

[16]

MetsnaV, VorobjovS, MärtsonA. Prevalence of anterior knee pain among patients following total knee arthroplasty with nonreplaced patella: a retrospective study of 1778 knees. Medicina, 2014, 50(2): 82-86 PMID: 25172601

[17]

BurnsLC, RitvoSE, FergusonMK, et al. . Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pain Res, 2015, 8: 21-32 PMID: 25609995 PMCID: 4294690

[18]

HoltG, MillerN, KellyMP, et al. . Retention of the patella in total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine, 2006, 73(5): 523-526 PMID: 16935544

[19]

DeehanDJ, PhaltankarPM, PinderIM. Do we need to replace the patella in knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid disease. Acta Orthop Belg, 2008, 74(4): 478-482 PMID: 18811030

[20]

PuloskiSK, McCaldenRW, MacDonaldSJ, et al. . Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: an unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83: 390 PMID: 11263643

[21]

LachiewiczPF, SoileauES. Ten-year survival and clinical results of constrained components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(6): 803-808 PMID: 16950030

[22]

ParviziJ, MarrsJ, MorreyBF. Total knee arthroplasty for neuropathic (Charcot) joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 416: 145-150 PMID: 14646753

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

106

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/