A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair

Abstract

Replacing urethral tissue with functional scaffolds has been one of the challenging problems in the field of urethra reconstruction or repair over the last several decades. Various scaffold materials have been used in animal studies, but clinical studies on use of scaffolds for urethral repair are scarce. The aim of this study was to review recent animal and clinical studies on the use of different scaffolds for urethral repair, and to evaluate these scaffolds based on the evidence from these studies. PubMed and OVID databases were searched to identify relevant studies, in conjunction with further manual search. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically evaluated. Of 555 identified studies, 38 were included for analysis. It was found that in both animal and clinical studies, scaffolds seeded with cells were used for repair of large segmental defects of the urethra, such as in tubular urethroplasty. When the defect area was small, cell-free scaffolds were more likely to be applied. A lot of pre-clinical and limited clinical evidence showed that natural or artificial materials could be used as scaffolds for urethral repair. Urinary tissue engineering is still in the immature stage, and the safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness of the scaffolds are needed for further study.

Keywords

material/scaffold / urethral repair / tissue engineering/regenerative medicine / animal models / clinical studies

References

[1] YamzonJ, PerinL, KohCJ. Current status of tissue engineering in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol, 2008, 18(4): 404-407 PMID: 18520763

[2] AtalaA. Recent applications of regenerative medicine to urologic structures and related tissues. Curr Opin Urol, 2006, 16(4): 305-309 PMID: 16770133

[3] TianH, BharadwajS, LiuY, et al. . Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into bladder cells: potential for urological tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 2010, 16(5): 1769-1779 PMCID: 2952115 PMID: 20020816

[4] WoodD, SouthgateJ. Current status of tissue engineering in urology. Curr Opin Urol, 2008, 18(6): 564-569 PMID: 18832940

[5] GimbleJM, KatzAJ, BunnellBA. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ Res, 2007, 100(9): 1249-1260 PMID: 17495232

[6] ReedCR, HanL, AndradyA, et al. . Composite tissue engineering on polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffolds. Ann Plast Surg, 2009, 62(5): 505-512 PMID: 19387150

[7] ParksJ 4, KathM, GabrickK, et al. . Nanotechnology applications in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a review. Plast Surg Nurs, 2012, 32(4): 156-164 PMID: 23188147

[8] AtalaA. Recent developments in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2006, 18(2): 167-171 PMID: 16601497

[9] HornJ, de HaanRJ, VermeulenM, et al. . Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review. Stroke, 2001, 32(10): 2433-2438 PMID: 11588338

[10] PoundP, EbrahimS, SandercockP, et al. . Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans. BMJ, 2004, 328(7438): 514-517 PMCID: 351856 PMID: 14988196

[11] NuiningaJE, van MoerkerkH, HanssenA, et al. . Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa. Eur Urol, 2003, 44(2): 266-271 PMID: 12875948

[12] KawanoPR, FugitaOE, YamamotoHA, et al. . Comparative study between porcine small intestinal submucosa and buccal mucosa in a partial urethra substitution in rabbits. J Endourol, 2012, 26(5): 427-432 PMID: 22191704

[13] KroppBP, LudlowJK, SpicerD, et al. . Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology, 1998, 52(1): 138-142 PMID: 9671888

[14] ChungYG, TuD, FranckD, et al. . Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplasty. PloS One, 2014, 9(3): e91592 PMCID: 3954771 PMID: 24632740

[15] El-AssmyA, El-HamidMA, HafezAT. Urethral replacement: a comparison between small intestinal submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration. BJU Int, 2004, 94(7): 1132-1135 PMID: 15541140

[16] FuQ, DengCL, LiuW, et al. . Urethral replacement using epidermal cell-seeded tubular acellular bladder collagen matrix. BJU Int, 2007, 99(5): 1162-1165 PMID: 17244284

[17] FuQ, DengCL, SongXF, et al. . Long-term study of male rabbit urethral mucosa reconstruction using epidermal cell. Asian J Androl, 2008, 10(5): 719-722 PMID: 18645674

[18] De FilippoRE, KornitzerBS, YooJJ, et al. . Penile urethra replacement with autologous cell-seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2015, 9(3): 257-264 PMID: 23172803

[19] GuGL, XiaSJ, ZhangJ, et al. . Tubularized urethral replacement using tissue-engineered peritoneum-like tissue in a rabbit model. Urol Int, 2012, 89(3): 358-364 PMID: 22797559

[20] OrabiH, AbouShwarebT, ZhangY, et al. . Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. Eur Urol, 2013, 63(3): 531-538 PMCID: 3554849 PMID: 22877501

[21] LiCL, LiaoWB, YangSX, et al. . Urethral reconstruction using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-and smooth muscle cell-seeded bladder acellular matrix. Transplanta Proc, 2013, 45(9): 3402-3407

[22] ChenF, YooJJ, AtalaA. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology, 1999, 54(3): 407-410 PMID: 10475343

[23] LiH, XuY, XieH, et al. . Epithelial-differentiated adipose-derived stem cells seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts for urethral reconstruction: an animal model. Tissue Eng Part A, 2014, 20(3–4): 774-784 PMCID: 3926141 PMID: 24329501

[24] LiC, XuYM, LiuZS, et al. . Urethral reconstruction with tissue engineering and RNA interference techniques in rabbits. Urology, 2013, 81(5): 1075-1080 PMID: 23490528

[25] HuangJW, XieMK, ZhangY, et al. . Reconstruction of penile urethra with the 3-dimensional porous bladder acellular matrix in a rabbit model. Urology, 2014, 84(6): 1499-1505 PMID: 25306480

[26] ChunSY, KimBS, KwonSY, et al. . Urethroplasty using autologous urethral tissue-embedded acellular porcine bladder submucosa matrix grafts for the management of long-segment urethral stricture in a rabbit model. J Korean Med Sci, 2015, 30(3): 301-307 PMCID: 4330486 PMID: 25729254

[27] SievertKD, BakirciogluME, NunesL, et al. . Homologous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol, 2000, 163(6): 1958-1965 PMID: 10799239

[28] SievertKD, WeferJ, BakirciogluME, et al. . Heterologous acellular matrix graft for reconstruction of the rabbit urethra: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol, 2001, 165(6): 2096-2102 PMID: 11371935

[29] ShokeirA, OsmanY, GabrM, et al. . Acellular matrix tube for canine urethral replacement: is it fact or fiction. J Urol, 2004, 171(1): 453-456 PMID: 14665954

[30] HanP, SongC, YangYR, et al. . Urethral acellular matrix graft for repairing urethral defect in rabbits. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao(Chinese), 2009, 29(1): 124-127

[31] ParnigottoPP, GambaPG, ConconiMT, et al. . Experimental defect in rabbit urethra repaired with acellular aortic matrix. Urol Res, 2000, 28(1): 46-55 PMID: 10732695

[32] WangF, LiuT, YangL, et al. . Urethral reconstruction with tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury modelsJ. Med Sci Monit, 2014, 20: 2430-2438 PMCID: 4257484 PMID: 25424000

[33] XieM, SongL, WangJ, et al. . Evaluation of stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrices seeded with urothelial cells for urethra reconstruction. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(2): 774-781 PMID: 23706393

[34] XieM, XuY, SongL, et al. . Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine model. J Surg Res, 2014, 188(1): 1-7 PMID: 24411303

[35] LiuCX, LinYY, LiHL, et al. . Application of silk fibroin film for repairing rabbit urethral defect. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao(Chinese)., 2007, 27(2): 184-187 PMID: 17355932

[36] KanataniI, KanematsuA, InatsuguY, et al. . Fabrication of an Optimal Urethral Graft Using Collagen-Sponge Tubes Reinforced with Copoly(L-Lactide/e-Caprolactone) Fabric. Tissue Eng, 2007, 13(12): 2933-2940 PMID: 17961002

[37] MicolLA, Arenas da SilvaLF, GeutjesPJ, et al. . In-vivo performance of high-density collagen gel tubes for urethral regeneration in a rabbit model. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(30): 7447-7455 PMID: 22795859

[38] MantovaniF, TrinchieriA, CastelnuovoC, et al. . Reconstructive urethroplasty using porcine acellular matrix. Eur Urol, 2003, 44(5): 600-602 PMID: 14572761

[39] le RouxPJ. Endoscopic urethroplasty with unseeded small intestinal submucosa collagen matrix grafts: a pilot study. J Urol, 2005, 173(1): 140-143 PMID: 15592056

[40] HauserS, BastianPJ, FechnerG, et al. . Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricture repair in a consecutive series. Urology, 2006, 68(2): 263-266 PMID: 16904431

[41] FialaR, VidlarA, VrtalR, et al. . Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(6): 1702-1708 PMID: 17306922

[42] PalminteriE, BerdondiniE, ColomboF, et al. . Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(6): 1695-1701 PMID: 17207913

[43] AtalaA, GuzmanL, RetikAB. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair. J Urol, 1999, 162(3): 1148-1151 PMID: 10458452

[44] El-KassabyAW, RetikAB, YooJJ, et al. . Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urol, 2003, 169(1): 170-173 PMID: 12478128

[45] el-KassabyA, Abou ShwarebT, AtalaA. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol, 2008, 179(4): 1432-1436 PMID: 18295282

[46] BhargavaS, PattersonJM, InmanRD, et al. . Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol, 2008, 53(6): 1263-1269 PMID: 18262717

[47] FossumM, SkikunieneJ, OrregoA, et al. . Prepubertal follow-up after hypospadias repair with autologous in vitro cultured urothelial cells. Acta Paediatr, 2012, 101(7): 755-760 PMID: 22471328

[48] Raya-RiveraA, EsquilianoDR, YooJJ, et al. . Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet, 2011, 377(9772): 1175-1182 PMCID: 4005887 PMID: 21388673

[49] CarsonJS, BostromMP. Synthetic bone scaffolds and fracture repair. Injury, 2007, 38(1): 33-37

[50] CarsonCC. Urethroplasty: a model for international progress in urology. Contemp Urol, 2006, 18(3): 1