Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay

Hong-fang Yuan , Martin Kuete , Li Su , Fan Yang , Zhi-yong Hu , Bo-zhen Tian , Hui-ping Zhang , Kai Zhao

Current Medical Science ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6) : 938 -942.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6) : 938 -942. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-015-1532-0
Article

Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Human sperm DNA is an important genetic and epigenetic material, whose chromatin structure differs from that of somatic cells. As such, conventional methods for DNA extraction of somatic cells may not be suitable for obtaining sperm DNA. In this study, we evaluated and compared three sperm DNA extraction techniques, namely, modified guanidinium thiocyanate method (method A), traditional phenol-chloroform method (method B), and TianGen kit method (method C). Spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis analyses showed that method A produced DNA with higher quantity and purity than those of methods B and C (P<0.01). PCR results revealed that method A was more reliable in amplifying DEAD-box polypeptide 4 (DDX4) and copy number variations (CNVs) than methods B and C, which generated false-positive errors. The results of sperm DNA methylation assay further indicated that methods A and B were effective, and the former yielded higher quantitative accuracy. In conclusion, the modified guanidinium thiocyanate method provided high quality and reliable results and could be an optimal technique for extracting sperm DNA for methylation assay.

Keywords

human sperm DNA / isolation / modified guanidinium thiocyanate / phenol-chloroform / TianGen kit

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hong-fang Yuan, Martin Kuete, Li Su, Fan Yang, Zhi-yong Hu, Bo-zhen Tian, Hui-ping Zhang, Kai Zhao. Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay. Current Medical Science, 2015, 35(6): 938-942 DOI:10.1007/s11596-015-1532-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

NickkholghB, MizrakSC, van DaalenSK, et al. . Genetic and epigenetic stability of human spermatogonial stem cells during long-term culture. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102(6): 1700-1707 PMID: 25256932

[2]

GuoH, ZhuP, YanL, et al. . The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature, 2014, 511(7511): 606-610 PMID: 25079557

[3]

CottonAM, PriceEM, JonesMJ, et al. . Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet, 2015, 24(6): 1528-1539 PMCID: 4381753 PMID: 25381334

[4]

WeiYC, YangCR, WeiYP, et al. . Paternally induced transgenerational inheritance of susceptibility to diabetes in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(5): 1873-1878 PMCID: 3918818 PMID: 24449870

[5]

EvensonD, JostL. Sperm chromatin structure assay: DNA denaturability. Methods Cell Biol, 1994, 42: 159-176 PMID: 7533238

[6]

HossainAM, RizkB, BehzadianA, et al. . Modified guanidinium thiocyanate method for human sperm DNA isolation. Mol Hum Reprod, 1997, 3(11): 953-956 PMID: 9433920

[7]

GriffinJ. Methods of sperm DNA extraction for genetic and epigenetic studies. Methods Mol Biol, 2013, 927: 379-384 PMID: 22992929

[8]

ZhangYL, XuL, QiuJA, et al. . Association between SNP rs10569304 on the second expressed region of hole gene and the congenital heart disease. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2010, 30(4): 430-436 PMID: 20714865

[9]

SilvaECB, PelincaMA, AcostaAC, et al. . Comparative study of DNA extraction methodologies from goat sperm and its effects on polymerase chain reaction analysis. Genet Mol Res, 2014, 13(3): 6070-6078 PMID: 25117364

[10]

LiH, WuC, GuX, et al. . A novel application of cell-free seminal mRNA: non-invasive identification of the presence of germ cells or complete obstruction in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(4): 991-997 PMID: 22286264

[11]

IzziB, BinderAM, MichelsKB. Pyrosequencing evaluation of widely available bisulfite conversion methods: considerations for application. Med Epigenet, 2014, 2(1): 28-36 PMCID: 4058339 PMID: 24944560

[12]

HeQ, ChenHY, BaiEQ, et al. . Development of a multiplex MethyLight assay for the detection of multigene methylation in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 2010, 202(1): 1-10 PMID: 20804913

[13]

KupiecJJ, GironML, ViletteD, et al. . Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA from eukaryotic cells by formamide treatment and dialysis. Anal Biochem, 1987, 164(1): 53-59 PMID: 2823634

[14]

Lo GiaccoD, ChianeseC, ArsE, et al. . Recurrent X chromosome-linked deletions: discovery of new genetic factors in male infertility. J Med Genet, 2014, 51(5): 340-344 PMID: 24421283

[15]

UsmanT, YuY, LiuC, et al. . Comparison of methods for high quantity and quality genomic DNA extraction from raw cow milk. Genet Mol Res, 2014, 13(2): 3319-3328 PMID: 24841664

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

115

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/