Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing versus apical pacing: A prospective, randomized, single-blind 5-years follow-up study of ventricular lead performance and safety

Abstract

Lead placement for ventricular pacing variably impacts the physiological benefit of the patient. This study evaluated the ventricular lead performance and safety of right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia in South China over 60-month follow-up. Totally, 192 patients (108 males, and 84 females, 63±21 years old) with bradyarrhythmia were randomly divided into two groups. The right ventricular outflow tract septum (RVOTs) group had lead placement near the septum (n=97), while the right ventricular apex (RVA) group had a traditional apical placement (n=95). RV septal lead positioning was achieved with a specialized stylet and confirmed using fluoroscopic projection. All patients were followed up for 60 months. Follow-up assessment included stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, lead impedance and lead complications. The time of electrode implantation in both the ROVTs and RVA groups were significantly different (4.29±0.61 vs. 2.16±0.22 min; P=0.009). No differences were identified in threshold, impedance or R-wave sensing between the two groups at 1st, 12th, 36th and 60th month during the follow-up period. No occurrence of electrode displacement, increased pacing threshold or inadequate sensing was found. The long-term active fixation ventricular electrode performance in RVOTs group was similar to that in RVA group. RVOTs pacing near the septum using active fixation electrodes may provide stability during long-term follow-up period.

Keywords

right ventricular outflow tract setptum septal pacing / follow-up / lead performance

References

[1] TrohmanRG, KimMH, PinskiSL. Cardiac pacing: the state of the art. Lancet, 2004, 364(9446): 1701-1719 PMID: 15530632

[2] SkanesAC, KrahnAD, YeeR, et al. . Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing. CTOPP Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 38(1): 167-172

[3] WilkoffBL, CookJR, EpsteinAE, et al. . Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA, 2002, 288(24): 3115-3123 PMID: 12495391

[4] KerrCR, ConnollySJ, AbdollahH, et al. . Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up. Circulation, 2004, 109(3): 357-362 PMID: 14707022

[5] NgAC, AllmanC, VidaicJ, et al. . Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second-or third-degree heart block. Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103(8): 1096-1101 PMID: 19361596

[6] DomenichiniG, SunthornH, FleuryE, et al. . Pacing of the interventricularseptum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Intern Med, 2012, 23(7): 621-627 PMID: 22939807

[7] MolinaL, SuttonR, GandoyW, et al. . Medium-term effects of septal and apical pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients: a double-blind prospective randomized study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2014, 37(2): 207-214 PMID: 23998710

[8] YuCM, ChanJY, ZhangQ, et al. . Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(22): 2123-2134 PMID: 19915220

[9] TopsLF, SchalijMJ, BaxJJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 54(9): 764-776 PMID: 19695453

[10] TseHF, YuC, WongKK, et al. . Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 40(8): 1451-1458 PMID: 12392836

[11] AlbouainiK, AlkarmiA, MudawiT, et al. . Selective site right ventricular pacing. Heart, 2009, 95(24): 2030-2039 PMID: 19740773

[12] MondHG. The road to right ventricular septal pacing: techniques and tools. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2010, 33(7): 888-898 PMID: 20456643

[13] ChenSL, LinCY, LiuL, et al. . The study on the application of active fixation leads in patients with right ventricular septum pacing. Chin J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol (Chinese), 2007, 21(5): 206-208

[14] ChenSL, LinCY, FeiHW, et al. . Right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing and right ventricular apical pacing random comparative study. Chin J Cardiac Arrhy (Chinese), 2009, 13(6): 253-257

[15] KistlerPM, LiewG, MondHG. Long-term performance of active-fixation pacing leads: a prospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2006, 29(3): 226-230 PMID: 16606388

[16] YusuS, MeraH, HoshidaK, et al. . Selective site pacing from the right ventricular mid-septum. Follow-up of lead performance and procedure technique. Int Heart J, 2012, 53(2): 113-116

[17] RossoR, TehAW, MediC, et al. . Right ventricular septal pacing: the success of stylet-driven active-fixation leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2010, 33(1): 49-53 PMID: 19804487

[18] MediC, MondHG. Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing: long-term follow-up of ventricular lead performance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2009, 32(2): 172-176 PMID: 19170905