Detection of congenital uterine malformation by using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound

Li-li Yu , Xuan Zhang , Ting Zhang , Han-rong Chen , Ze-hua Wang

Current Medical Science ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 782 -784.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 782 -784. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-014-1352-7
Article

Detection of congenital uterine malformation by using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study assessed the clinical application of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound (3D TVUS) in the diagnosis of congenital uterine malformation. A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients with congenital uterine malformation confirmed hysteroscopically and/or laparoscopically. The patients were subjected to transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound (2D TVUS) and 3D TVUS. The accuracy rate was compared between the two methods. The accuracy rate of 3D TVUS was (98.38%, 61/62), higher than that of 2D TVUS (80.65%, 50/62). 3D TVUS coronal plane imaging could demonstrate the internal shape of the endometrial cavity and the external contour of the uterine fundus. It allowed accurate measurement on the coronary plane, and could three-dimensionally show the image of cervical tube, thereby providing information for the diagnosis of some complex uterine malformation. 3D TVUS imaging can obtain comprehensive information of the uterus malformation, and it is superior to 2D TVUS for the diagnosis of congenital uterine malformations, especially complex uterine anomaly.

Keywords

congenital uterine malformation / transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound / coronary plane

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Li-li Yu, Xuan Zhang, Ting Zhang, Han-rong Chen, Ze-hua Wang. Detection of congenital uterine malformation by using transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound. Current Medical Science, 2014, 34(5): 782-784 DOI:10.1007/s11596-014-1352-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WuMH, HsuCC, HuangEK. Detection of congenital müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound, 1997, 25(9): 487-492 PMID: 9350567

[2]

JayaprakasanK, ChanYY, SurS, et al. . Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(6): 727-732 PMID: 21337662

[3]

Fertil Steril, 1988, 49(6

[4]

GhiT, CasadioP, KulevaM, et al. . Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril, 2009, 922): 808-813 PMID: 18692833

[5]

GolanA, LangerR, BukovskyI, et al. . Congenital anomalies of the müllerian system. Fertil Steril, 1989, 51(5): 747-755 PMID: 2651163

[6]

ByrneJ, Nussbaum-BlaskA, TaylorWS, et al. . Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet, 2000, 94(1): 9-12 PMID: 10982475

[7]

MakinoT, HaraT, OkaC, et al. . Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1992, 44(2): 123-130 PMID: 1587377

[8]

CliffordK, RaiR, WatsonH, et al. . An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod, 1994, 9(7): 1328-1332 PMID: 7962442

[9]

ShahzadS. Investigation of the prevalence of female genital tract tuberculosis and its relation to female infertility: An observational analytical study. Iran J Reprod Med, 2012, 10(6): 581-588 PMID: 25246930 PMCID: 4169853

[10]

AhmadiF, ZafarianiF, HaghighiH, et al. . Application of 3D ultrasonography in detection of uterine anomalies. Int J Fertil Steril, 2011, 4(4): 144-147 PMID: 24851173 PMCID: 4023499

[11]

PuscheckEE, CohenL. Congenital malformations of the uterus: the role of ultrasound. Semin Reprod Med, 2008, 26(3): 223-231 PMID: 18504697

[12]

SaravelosSH, CocksedgeKA, LiTC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Repro Update, 2008, 14(5): 415-429

[13]

NiknejadiM, HaghighiH, AhmadiF, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography in the detection of uterine abnormalities in infertile women. Iran J Radiol, 2012, 9(3): 139-144 PMID: 23329979 PMCID: 3522369

[14]

RagaF, Bonilla-MusolesF, BlanesJ, et al. . Congenital Mullerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65(3): 523-528 PMID: 8774280

[15]

LudwinA, PityńskiK, LudwinI, et al. . Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20(1): 90-99 PMID: 23312248

[16]

BermejoC, Ten MartínezP, CantareroR, et al. . Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35(5): 593-601 PMID: 20052665

[17]

La TorreR, Prosperi PortaR, FrancoC, et al. . Three-dimensional sonography and hysterosalpingosonography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 30(4): 190-192 PMID: 14664407

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

92

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/