Osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells regulated by osteoblasts under EMF exposure in a co-culture system

Abstract

This study examined the osteogenic effect of electromagnetic fields (EMF) under the simulated in vivo conditions. Rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and rat osteoblasts were co-cultured and exposed to 50 Hz, 1.0 mT EMF for different terms. Unexposed single-cultured BMSCs and osteoblasts were set as controls. Cell proliferation features of single-cultured BMSCs and osteoblasts were studied by using a cell counting kit (CCK-8). For the co-culture system, cells in each group were randomly chosen for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining on the day 7. When EMF exposure lasted for 14 days, dishes in each group were randomly chosen for total RNA extraction and von Kossa staining. The mRNA expression of osteogenic markers was detected by using real-time PCR. Our study showed that short-term EMF exposure (2 h/day) could obviously promote proliferation of BMSCs and osteoblasts, while long-term EMF (8 h/day) could promote osteogenic differentiation significantly under co-cultured conditions. Under EMF exposure, osteogenesis-related mRNA expression changed obviously in co-cultured and single-cultured cells. It was noteworthy that most osteogenic indices in osteoblasts were increased markedly after co-culture except Bmp2, which was increased gradually when cells were exposed to EMF. Compared to other indices, the expression of Bmp2 in BMSCs was increased sharply in both single-cultured and co-cultured groups when they were exposed to EMF. The mRNA expression of Bmp2 in BMSCs was approximately four times higher in 8-h EMF group than that in the unexposed group. Our results suggest that Bmp2-mediated cellular interaction induced by EMF exposure might play an important role in the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

Keywords

electromagnetic fields / bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell / osteoblast / osteogenic mechanism / co-culture

References

[1] BassettCA, PillaAA, PawlukRJ. A non-operative salvage of surgically-resistant pseudarthroses and non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1977128-143

[2] BorsalinoG, BagnacaniM, BettatiE, et al.. Electrical stimulation of human femoral intertrochanteric osteotomies. Double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988256-263

[3] BrightonCT, ShamanP, HeppenstallRB, et al.. Tibial nonunion treated with direct current, capacitive coupling, or bone graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995223-234

[4] EyresKS, SalehM, KanisJA. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone formation and bone loss during limb lengthening. Bone, 1996, 18(6): 505-509

[5] SimmonsJWJr, MooneyV, ThackerI. Pseudarthrosis after lumbar spine fusion: nonoperative salvage with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2004, 33(1): 27-30

[6] PolkC, PostowE. . Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields, 19962nd edBoca Raton, FL, CRC Press

[7] FassinaL, VisaiL, BenazzoF, et al.. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold. Tissue Eng, 2006, 12(7): 1985-1999

[8] WangZ, ClarkCC, BrightonCT. Up-Regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins in cultured murine bone cells with use of specific electric fields. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(5): 1053-1065

[9] TsaiMT, ChangWH, ChangK, et al.. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering. Bioelectromagnetics, 2007, 28(7): 519-528

[10] ZhangX, ZhangJ, QuX, et al.. Effects of different extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on osteoblasts. Electromagn Biol Med, 2007, 26(3): 167-177

[11] BarkerAT. Electricity, magnetism and the body: some uses and abuses. J R Soc Health, 1994, 114(2): 91-97

[12] LeisnerS, ShaharR, AizenbergI, et al.. The effect of short-duration, high-intensity electromagnetic pulses on fresh ulnar fractures in rats. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med, 2002, 49(1): 33-37

[13] SakaiY, PattersonTE, IbiwoyeMO, et al.. Exposure of mouse preosteoblasts to pulsed electromagnetic fields reduces the amount of mature, type I collagen in the extracellular matrix. J Orthop Res, 2006, 24(2): 242-253

[14] SollazzoV, TrainaGC, DeMatteiM, et al.. Responses of human MG-63 osteosarcoma cell line and human osteoblast-like cells to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 1997, 18(8): 541-547

[15] LohmannCH, SchwartzZ, LiuY, et al.. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production. J Orthop Res, 2000, 18(4): 637-646

[16] LohmannCH, SchwartzZ, LiuY, et al.. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect phenotype and connexin 43 protein expression in MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cells and ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. J Orthop Res, 2003, 21(2): 326-334

[17] SollazzoV, TrainaGC, DeMatteiM, et al.. Responses of human MG-63 osteosarcoma cell line and human osteoblast-like cells to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 1997, 18(8): 541-547

[18] YangY, TaoC, ZhaoD, et al.. EMF acts on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to promote differentiation to osteoblasts and to inhibit differentiation to adipocytes. Bioelectromagnetics, 2010, 31(4): 277-285

[19] ShalhoubV, ConlonD, TassinariM, et al.. Glucocorticoids promote development of the osteoblast phenotype by selectively modulating expression of cell growth and differentiation associated genes. J Cell Biochem, 1992, 50(4): 425-440

[20] KwokS, QinL, PartridgeNC, et al.. Parathyroid hormone stimulation and PKA signaling of latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein-1 (LTBP-1) mRNA expression in osteoblastic cells. J Cell Biochem, 2005, 95(5): 1002-1011

[21] KaplowLS. Leukocyte alkaline phosphatase cytochemistry: applications and methods. Ann New York Acad Sci, 1969, 155(2): 911-947

[22] JaiswalN, HaynesworthSE, CaplanAI, et al.. Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J Cell Biochem, 1997, 64(2): 295-312

[23] ChangJK, LiCJ, WuSC, et al.. Effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on proliferation, cytotoxicity and osteogenesis in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochemical Pharmacology, 2007, 74(9): 1371-1382

[24] LivakKJ, SchmittgenTD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408

[25] MaromR, ShurI, SolomonR, et al.. Characterization of adhesion and differentiation markers of osteogenic marrow stromal cells. J Cell Physiol, 2005, 202(1): 41-48

[26] WozneyJM. The bone morphogenetic protein family and osteogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev, 1992, 32(2): 160-167

[27] UristMR. Bone morphogenetic protein: the molecularization of skeletal system development. J Bone Miner Res, 1997, 12(3): 343-346

[28] MariePJ, DebiaisF, HayE. Regulation of human cranial osteoblast phenotype by FGF-2, FGFR-2 and BMP-2 signaling. Histol Histopathol, 2002, 17(3): 877-885

[29] YamaguchiA, KomoriT, SudaT. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation mediated by bone morphogenetic proteins, hedgehogs, and cbfa1. Endocr Rev, 2000, 21(4): 393-411

[30] GuicheuxJ, LemonnierJ, GhayorC, et al.. Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase by BMP-2 and their implication in the stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation. J Bone Miner Res, 2003, 18(11): 2060-2068

[31] ChenD, ZhaoM, MundyGR. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors, 2004, 22(4): 233-241

[32] HeldinCH, MiyazonoK, ten DijkeP. TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature, 1997, 390(6659): 465-471

[33] NakaoA, ImamuraT, SouchelnytskyiS, et al.. TGF-beta receptor-mediated signalling through Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4. EMBO J, 1997, 16(17): 5353-5362

[34] NishimuraR, HataK, HarrisSE, et al.. Core-binding factor alpha 1 (Cbfa1) induces osteoblastic differentiation of C2C12 cells without interactions with Smad1 and Smad5. Bone, 2002, 31(2): 303-312