PDF
Abstract
This study examined the adhesive strength of two self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealers (MetaSEAL and RealSeal SE) to root dentin and compared them with RealSeal and AH Plus in properties. A total of 48 extracted human single-rooted teeth were used to prepare the 0.9-mm thick longitudinal tooth slice (each per tooth). Standardized simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions were prepared in the middle of radicular dentin. After treated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA, tooth slices were allocated randomly to four groups (n=12) in terms of different sealers used: MetaSEAL, RealSeal SE, RealSeal, and AH plus groups. The simulated canal spaces were obturated with different sealers in each group. There were 10 slabs with 20 simulated canal spaces (n=20) used in each group for push-out testing. The failure modes and the ultrastructures of fractured sealer-dentin interfaces were examined. The remaining 2 slabs in each group underwent partial demineralization for observation of the ultrastructure of resin tags. The results showed that the push-out bond strength was 12.01±4.66 MPa in MetaSEAL group, significantly higher than that in the other three groups (P<0.05). Moreover, no statistically significant differences were noted in the push-out bond strength between RealSeal SE (5.43±3.68 MPa) and AH Plus (7.34±2.83 MPa) groups and between RealSeal SE and RealSeal (2.93±1.76 MPa) groups (P>0.05). Mixed failures were predominant in the fractured sealer-dentin interfaces in MetaSEAL and AH Plus groups, while adhesive failures were frequently seen in RealSeal SE and RealSeal groups. In conclusion, after complete removal of the smear layer, MetaSEAL showed superior bond ability to root dentin. The RealSeal SE is applicable in clinical practice, with its adhesive strength similar to that of AH Plus. The self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealer holds promise for use in endodontic treatment.
Keywords
endodontic sealer
/
push-out bond strength
/
adhesive interface
/
raidicular dentin
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Yan Sun, Yu-hong Li, Ming-wen Fan.
Push-out bond strength of self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealers to root dentin.
Current Medical Science, 2014, 34(1): 108-113 DOI:10.1007/s11596-014-1240-1
| [1] |
SchilderH. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am, 1967723-744
|
| [2] |
ShipperG, OrstavikD, TeixeiraFB, et al.. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod, 2004, 30(5): 342-347
|
| [3] |
GulsahiK, CehreliZC, OnayEO, et al.. Comparison of the area of resin-based sealer and voids in roots obturated with Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod, 2007, 33(11): 1338-1341
|
| [4] |
LotfiM, GhasemiN, RahimiS, et al.. Resilon: A comprehensive literature review. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2013, 7(3): 119-130
|
| [5] |
CecchinD, SouzaM, Carlini-JuniorB, et al.. Bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany compared with Gutta-percha and sealers Sealer 26 and Endo Fill. Aust Endod J, 2012, 38(1): 21-25
|
| [6] |
AriH, BelliS, GunesB. Sealing ability of Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) in conjunction with different obturation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(6): e113-e116
|
| [7] |
ErsevH, YilmazB, PehlivanogluE, et al.. Resistance to vertical root fracture of endodontically treated teeth with MetaSEAL. J Endod, 2012, 38(5): 653-656
|
| [8] |
NagpalA, AnnapoornaBM, PrashanthMB, et al.. A comparative evaluation of the vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different root canal sealers: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2012, 13(3): 351-355
|
| [9] |
Marin-BauzaGA, Rached-JuniorFJ, Souza-GabrielAE, et al.. Physicochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod, 2010, 36(9): 1531-1536
|
| [10] |
ChangJC, HurstTL, HartDA, et al.. 4-META use in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(2): 216-224
|
| [11] |
Van LanduytKL, SnauwaertJ, De MunckJ, et al.. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(26): 3757-3785
|
| [12] |
PatilS A, DodwadPK, PatilAA. An in vitro comparison of bond strengths of Gutta-percha/AH Plus, Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and EndoREZ obturation system to intraradicular dentin using a push-out test design. J Conserv Dent, 2013, 16(3): 238-242
|
| [13] |
De-DeusG, Di GiorgiK, FidelS, et al.. Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany and Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to root dentin. J Endod, 2009, 35(7): 1048-1050
|
| [14] |
CostaJA, Rached-JuniorFA, Souza-GabrielAE, et al.. Push-out strength of methacrylate resin-based sealers to root canal walls. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(8): 698-706
|
| [15] |
CarneiroSM, Sousa-NetoMD, RachedFJ, et al.. Push-out strength of root fillings with or without thermomechanical compaction. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(9): 821-828
|
| [16] |
BarbizamJV, TropeM, TeixeiraEC, et al.. Effect of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on the bond strength of a resin-based endodontic sealer. Braz Dent J, 2008, 19(3): 224-227
|
| [17] |
HuffmanBP, MaiS, PinnaL, et al.. Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine. Int Endod J, 2009, 42(1): 34-46
|
| [18] |
OrstavikD, EriksenHM, Beyer-OlsenEM. Adhesive properties and leakage of root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J, 1983, 16(2): 59-63
|
| [19] |
StewartGG. A comparative study of three root canal sealing agents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1958, 11(10): 1174-1178
|
| [20] |
RahalV, de OliveiraFG, BrisoAL, et al.. Correlation between hybrid layer thickness, resin tag length and microtensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system. Acta Odontol Latinoam, 2012, 25(2): 231-237
|
| [21] |
GesiA, RaffaelliO, GoracciC, et al.. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod, 2005, 31(11): 809-813
|
| [22] |
MannocciF, PileckiP, BertelliE, et al.. Density of dentinal tubules affects the tensile strength of root dentin. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(3): 293-296
|
| [23] |
AkmanM, AkmanS, DerinbayO, et al.. Evaluation of gaps or voids occurring in roots filled with three different sealers. Eur J Dent, 2010, 4(2): 101-109
|
| [24] |
BabbBR, LoushineRJ, BryanTE, et al.. Bonding of self-adhesive (self-etching) root canal sealers to radicular dentin. J Endod, 2009, 35(4): 578-582
|
| [25] |
FingerWJ, FritzUB. Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with one-component UDMA/HEMA adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci, 1997, 105(2): 183-186
|