Unsedated versus sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: A questionnaire investigation in Wuhan, central China

Abstract

National data show that in China mainland unsedated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has been applied in most hospitals for clinical examination, while sedated GI endoscopy is only performed in some hospitals. The purpose of this study was to compare sedated versus unsedated GI endoscopy regarding cost, safety, degree of comfort, tolerance level and overall satisfaction of patients over a 6-month period investigation. From March to September 2011, a questionnaire survey was performed on 1800 patients and 30 physicians at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command. The patients fell into two groups according to their own decisions: the unsedated group (n=1000) and the sedated group (n=800). After examination, the patients and the physicians were required to fill in a questionnaire form. All the data were analyzed statistically. The results showed that the main factors the patients took for consideration between sedated and unsedated procedures included economy, comfort and safety. The income levels between the sedated and unsedated groups showed significant difference (P<0.01). Most patients in the unsedated group had lower income and were covered by less medical insurance. The tolerance rate was 92.4% vs. 65.5% between the sedated and unsedated group, respectively. 95.5% patients in the sedated group and 72.1% patients in the unsedated group chose the same endoscopy procedure for repeat examination. The survey data from endoscopists suggested the sedated procedure was more comfortable but less safe than the unsedated procedure (P<0.01). In China, unsedated GI endoscopy is now widely accepted by the majority of patients due to low cost and safety. Compared to unsedated GI endoscopy, sedated GI endoscopy is less painful, but more expensive and less safe. With the rapid improvement of people’s living standard and the reliability of sedation technology, we expect sedated GI endoscopy will be gradually accepted by more patients.

Keywords

gastrointestinal endoscopy / sedated / unsedated / comparative study

References

[1] PorostockyP, ChibaN, ColacinoP, et al.. A survey of sedation practices for colonoscopy in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol, 2011, 25(5): 255-260

[2] RiphausA, Macias-GomezC, DevièreJ, et al.. Propofol, the preferred sedation for screening colonoscopy, is underused. Results of an international survey. Dig Liver Dis, 2012, 44(5): 389-392

[3] EberlS, PreckelB, FockensP, et al.. Analgesia without sedatives during colonoscopies: worth considering?. Tech Coloproctol, 2012, 16(4): 271-276

[4] PaggiS, RadaelliF, AmatoA, et al.. Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 75(2): 392-398

[5] AmatoA, RadaelliF, PaggiS, et al.. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(4): 511-518

[6] WangD, ChenC, ChenJ, et al.. The use of propofol as a sedative agent in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. PloS One, 2013, 8(1): e53311

[7] LanCH, ShenXC, CuiHL, et al.. Comparison of nitrous oxide to no sedation and deep sedation for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(6): 1066-1072

[8] WangD, WangS, ChenJ, et al.. Propofol combined with traditional sedative agents versus propofol-alone sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2013, 48(1): 101-110

[9] AljebreenAM. Unsedated endoscopy: Is it feasible?. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(4): 243-244

[10] SachdevaA, BhallaA, SoodA, et al.. The effect of sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2010, 16(4): 280-284

[11] VargoJ, HowardK, PetrilloJ, et al.. Development and validation of the patient and clinician sedation satisfaction index for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 7(2): 156-162

[12] LeungFW, AharonianHS, LeungJW, et al.. Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in US veterans. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69(3): 546-550

[13] The Chinese Bureau of Statistics: The statistical announcement of national economy and social development in 2012 in China. (Accessed February 22, 2013 at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20130221_402874525.htm)

[14] Redondo-CerezoE, Sánchez-RobainaA, Martínez CaraJG, et al.. Gastroenterologist-guided sedation with propofol for endoscopic ultrasonography in average-risk and high-risk patients: a prospective series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 24(5): 506-521

[15] HoriuchiA, NakayamaY, KajiyamaM, et al.. Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpa tient colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(26): 3420-3425

[16] FriedrichK, StremmelW, SiegA. Endoscopist-administered propofol sedation is safe-a prospective evaluation of 10,000 patients in an outpatient practice. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2012, 21(3): 259-263

[17] TalaieR, MonfaredMH, ZojajiH, et al.. Effects of sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on arterial oxygen saturation. Hepatogastroenterology, 2009, 56(89): 158-161

[18] AmornyotinS, LeelakusolvongS, ChalayonnawinW, et al.. Age-dependent safety analysis of propofol-based deep sedation for ERCP and EUS procedures at an endoscopy training center in a developing country. Clin Exp Gastroenterol, 2012, 5: 123-128

[19] AmornyotinS. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 5(2): 47-55

[20] BehrensA, LabenzJ, SchulerA, et al.. How safe is sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy? A multicentre analysis of 388,404 endoscopies and analysis of data from prospective registries of complications managed by members of the Working Group of Leading Hospital Gastroenterologists (ALGK). Z Gastroenterol (German), 2013, 51(5): 432-436