Long-term reproductive consequences of no-scalpel vasectomy in beagles

Abstract

The effects of vasectomy on the reproductive organs in various species are controversial. This study investigated the morphological change and apoptosis of the testis, epididymis, and vas deferens in beagle dogs 12 months after vasectomy. The male beagles were divided into two groups: vasectomized and sham-operated groups (n=5 in each). Histopathological, ultrastructural, and TUNEL evaluation of the changes in the testis, epididymis, and ductus deferens of each animal were conducted 12 months after surgery. The mean lumen diameter, cellular thickness, mean interstitial distance, and lumen area fraction of each seminiferous tubule and ductus epididymis were measured by stereological analysis. The results showed that, compared with the sham-operated group, the seminiferous tubular epithelial cells of the testes in the vasectomized group were disorderly arranged and scattered. Significant atrophy and apoptosis were found in the endothelial cells, and a range of ultrastructural variations were observed in the cells of testes, epididymis, and vas deferens in vasectomized group. It was concluded that complete obstruction of the vas deferens as a traditional contraception method is not absolutely safe in terms of the reversal of fertility in the long run. Techniques of relieving the inner pressure in the vas deferens while maintaining the efficacy of male contraception need to be explored.

Keywords

vasectomy / dogs / pathology / ultrastructure / apoptosis

References

[1] FarleyT.M., MeirikO., MehtaS., et al.. The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns. Bull World Health Organ, 1993, 71(3–4): 413-419

[2] PantP.R., SharmaJ., SubbaS.. Scrotal haematoma: the most common complication of no-scalpel vasectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J, 2007, 5(2): 279-280

[3] JarowJ.P., GoluboffE.T., ChangT.S., et al.. Relationship between antisperm antibodies and testicular histologic changes in humans after vasectomy. Urology, 1994, 43(4): 521-524

[4] AydosK., SoygurT., KupeliB., et al.. Testicular effects of vasectomy in rats: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Urology, 1998, 51(6): 1051-1056

[5] JessopT.S., LaddsP.W.. The immunopathology of unilateral vasectomy in the ram. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 1995, 47(1–2): 123-133

[6] FlickingerC.J.. Fine structure of the rabbit testis after vasectomy. Biol Reprod, 1975, 13(1): 61-67

[7] AlexanderN.J.. Autoimmune hypospermatogenesis in vasectomized guinea pigs. Contraception, 1973, 8(2): 147-164

[8] KothariL.K., MishraP.. Histochemical changes in the testis and epididymis after vasectomy. Int J Fertil, 1973, 18(2): 119-125

[9] KubotaR.. Electron microscopic studies of the testis after vasectomy in rats and men. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 1969, 60: 373-397

[10] LofstedtR.M.. Vasectomy in ruminants: a cranial midscrotal approach. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 1982, 181(4): 373-375

[11] ClenneyT.L., HigginsJ.C.. Vasectomy techniques. Am Fam Physician, 1999, 60(1): 137-146

[12] KumarV., KazaR.M., SinghI., et al.. An evaluation of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique. BJU Int, 1999, 83(3): 283-284

[13] SokalD., McMullenS., GatesD., et al.. A comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries. The Male Sterilization Investigator Team. J Urol, 1999, 162(5): 1621-1625

[14] ChristensenP., al-AqidiO.A., JensenF.S., et al.. Vasectomy. A prospective, randomized trial of vasectomy with bilateral incision versus the Li vasectomy. Ugeskr Laeger, 2002, 164(18): 2390-2394

[15] SarratR., WhyteJ., TorresA., et al.. Experimental vasectomy and testicular structure. Histol Histopathol, 1996, 11(1): 1-6

[16] DerrickF.C.Jr, GloverW.L., KanjuparambanZ., et al.. Histologic changes in the seminiferous tubules after vasectomy. Fertil Steril, 1974, 25(8): 649-658

[17] BlancoA., MoyanoR., VivoJ., et al.. Quantitative changes in the testicular structure in mice exposed to low doses of cadmium. Environ Toxicol Phar, 2007, 23(1): 96-101

[18] SilvaR.C., CostaG.M., AndradeL.M., et al.. Testis stereology, seminiferous epithelium cycle length, and daily sperm production in the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis). Theriogenology, 2010, 73(2): 157-167

[19] AllanD.J., HarmonB.V., RobertsS.A.. Spermatogonial apoptosis has three morphologically recognizable phases and shows no circadian rhythm during normal spermatogenesis in the rat. Cell Prolif, 1992, 25(3): 241-250

[20] HaldarN., CranstonD., TurnerE., et al.. How reliable is a vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men. Lancet, 2000, 356(9223): 43-44

[21] VareA.M., BansalP.C.. Changes in the canine testes after bilateral vasectomy-an experimental study. Fertil Steril, 1973, 24(10): 793-797

[22] AitkenH., KumarakuruS., ReidO., et al.. Degenerated tubules in the guinea pig testis after long-term vasectomy or sham operation. Clin Anat, 2000, 13(1): 6-10

[23] McDonaldS.W., LockhartA., GormalD., et al.. Changes in the testes following vasectomy in the rat. Clin Anat, 1996, 9(5): 296-301

[24] Perez-MarinC.C., LopezR., DominguezJ.M., et al.. Clinical and pathological findings in testis, epididymis, deferens duct and prostate following vasectomy in a dog. Reprod Domest Anim, 2006, 41(2): 169-174

[25] ErreyB.B., EdwardsI.S.. Open-ended vasectomy: an assessment. Fertil Steril, 1986, 45(6): 843-846

[26] ShapiroE.I., SilberS.J.. Open-ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and postvasectomy orchialgia. Fertil Steril, 1979, 32(5): 546-550

[27] JarvisL.J., DubbinsP.A.. Changes in the epididymis after vasectomy: sonographic findings. AJR, 1989, 152(3): 531-534

[28] GuptaA.S., KothariL.K., BapnaR.B.. Surgical sterilization by vasectomy and its effects on the structure and function of the testis in man. Br J Surg, 1975, 62(1): 59-63

[29] JenkinsI.L., MuirV.Y., BlacklockN.J., et al.. Consequences of vasectomy: an immunological and histological study related to subsequent fertility. Br J Urol, 1979, 51(5): 406-410