Apical root resorption in maxillary incisors when employing micro-implant and J-hook headgear anchorage: A 4-month radiographic study

Abstract

This study evaluated, over a 4-month study period, the amount of apical root resorption occurring in maxillary central incisors following their retraction when employing either micro-implant or J-hook headgear anchorage. The prospective randomised clinical trial was conducted in Orthodontic Clinic, College of Stomatology, China from 2008–2009. Subjects are patients requiring fixed appliances on waiting list (n=20). In female Han Chinese patients aged from 16–26 years, standardized periapical radiographs from 10 randomly assigned patients with maxillary protrusions comprising the micro-implant group, and from 10 similar patients comprising the J-hook headgear group, were assessed for maxillary central incisor apical root resorption. Measurements before and after orthodontic therapy were also obtained from lateral cephalometric radiographs to calculate incisor horizontal retraction and vertical intrusion distances. Estimated retraction force vectors were calculated in horizontal and vertical directions for both treatment groups. Data analysis employed t-tests and the Pearson correlation test, with α=0.05 for statistical significance. The results showed that when compared with the J-hook group, significantly more apical root resorption shortening of the maxillary central incisors was observed in the micro-implant group (1.27 mm difference, 95% CI=0.70–1.84, P<0.001), which was associated with a significantly larger retraction distance (P=0.004) and a smaller vertical force component (P<0.0001). We are led to conclude that continuous activation of the nickel-titanium coil springs used in the micro-implant group resulted in significantly more apical root resorption shortening and maxillary central incisor retraction than when intermittent J-hook retraction was employed. The employment of continuous duration orthodontic forces presents a risk for increased apical root resorption that requires careful radiographic monitoring.

Keywords

root resorption / incisor retraction / micro-implant / J-hook

References

[1] PizzoG., LicataM.E., GuigliaR., et al.. Root resorption and orthodontic treatment. Review of the literature. Minerva Stomatologica, 2007, 56(1–2): 31-44

[2] LopatieneK., DumbravaiteA.. Risk factors of root resorption after orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija, 2008, 10(3): 89-95

[3] FaltinR.M., FaltinK., SanderF.G., et al.. Ultrastructure of cementum and periodontal ligament after continuous intrusion in humans: a transmission electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod, 2001, 23(1): 35-49

[4] LevanderE., MalmgrenO.. Long-term follow-up of maxillary incisors with severe apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod, 2000, 22(1): 85-92

[5] ChenW.J., LiQ.Y., GongA.X., et al.. Comparison between J-hook and micro-implant anchorage in the treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi (Chinese), 2008, 43(2): 83-86

[6] MaJ., WangL., ZhangW., et al.. Comparative evaluation of micro-implant and headgear anchorage used with a pre-adjusted appliance system. Eur J Orthod, 2008, 30(3): 283-287

[7] ParkH.S., YoonD.Y., ParkC.S., et al.. Treatment effects and anchorage potential of sliding mechanics with titanium screws compared with the Tweed-Merrifield technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(4): 593-600

[8] DeguchiT., MurakamiT., KurodaS., et al.. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(5): 654-660

[9] ParkH.S.. An anatomical study using CT images for the implantation of micro-implants. Korean J Orthod, 2002, 32(6): 435-441

[10] SameshimaG.T., SinclairP.M.. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119(5): 505-510

[11] Owman-MollP.. Orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption with special reference to force magnitude and duration. A clinical and histological investigation in adolescents. Swedish Dent J Suppl, 1995, 105: 1-45

[12] JiangR.P., ZhangD., FuM.K.. A factors study of root resorption after orthodontic treatment. Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi (Chinese), 2003, 38(6): 455-457

[13] MirabellaA.D., ÅrtunJ.. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 108(1): 48-55

[14] LingeB.O., LingeL.. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod, 1983, 5(3): 173-183

[15] BaumrindS., KornE.L., BoydR.L.. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110(3): 311-320

[16] LinY., ZhongP.P., ZhangD.Q.. Investigation of the possible factors related to root resorption during orthodontic treat ment in adolescents. Shanghai Kouqiang Yixue, 2007, 16(1): 24-27

[17] MarquesL.S., Ramos-JorgeM.L., ReyA.C., et al.. Severe root resorption in orthodontic patients treated with the edgewise method: prevalence and predictive factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(3): 384-388

[18] RuppR.. Root resorption related to orthodontics and other factors: a review of the literature. J Gen Orthod, 1995, 6(3): 25-29

[19] ÅrtunJ., SmaleI., BehbehaniF., et al.. Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(6): 919-926

[20] SmaleI., ÅrtunJ., BehbehaniF., et al.. Apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 128: 57-67

[21] SameshimaG.T., SinclairP.M.. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part II. Treatment factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 119(5): 511-515

[22] HujoelP., HollenderL., BollenA.M., et al.. Radiographs associated with one episode of orthodontic therapy. J Dent Edu, 2006, 70(10): 1061-1065

[23] MavraganiM., VergariA., SellisethN.J., et al.. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-wire edgewise technique. Eur J Orthod, 2000, 22(6): 665-674

[24] MohandesanH., RavanmehrH., ValaeiN.. A radiographic analysis of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors during active orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod, 2007, 29(2): 134-139

[25] HarryM.R., SimsM.R.. Root resorption in bicuspid intrusion: a scanning election microscope study. Angle Orthod, 1982, 52(3): 235-258

[26] CostopoulosG., NandaR.. An evaluation of root resorption incident to orthodontic intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 109(5): 543-548

[27] StutevilleO.H.. Injuries caused by orthodontic forces and the ultimate results of these injuries. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1938, 24: 103-116

[28] ArasB., ChengL.L., TurkT., et al.. Physical properties of root cementum: part 23. Effects of 2 or 3 weekly reactivated continuous or intermittent orthodontic forces on root resorption and tooth movement: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 141(2): 29-37