Experience in management of Fournier’s gangrene: A report of 24 cases

Longwang Wang , Xiaomin Han , Mei Liu , Yan Ma , Bing Li , Feng Pan , Wencheng Li , Liang Wang , Xiong Yang , Zhaohui Chen , Fuqing Zeng

Current Medical Science ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 719 -723.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 719 -723. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-012-1024-4
Article

Experience in management of Fournier’s gangrene: A report of 24 cases

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Fournier’s gangrene (FG) is an extremely aggressive and rapidly progressive polymicrobial soft tissue infection of the perineum, anal area or genitalial regions with a high mortality rate. The objectives of this study were to share our experience with the management of this serious infectious disease over the last 15 years. This retrospective study examined 24 patients diagnosed as having FG who were admitted to our hospital between March 1996 and December 2011. The gender, age, etiology, predisposing factors, laboratory findings, treatment modality, hospitalization time and spread of gangrene of the subjects were all recorded and analyzed. The results showed that the mean age of the patients was 48.33 years, the male-to-female ratio was 5:1 and the mortality rate was 20.8% (5/24). The most common predisposing factor was diabetes mellitus in 10 patients (41.6%), followed by alcohol abuse, obesity, neoplasms and immunosuppression. The most common etiology was peri-anal and peri-rectal abscesses (45.8%), followed by lesions of urogenital origin (33.3%) and cutaneous (8.3%) origin. No local pathologies could be identified in 3 (12.5%) patients. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Escherichia coli (62.5%), followed by Enterococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The median admission Fournier’s gangrene severity index (FGSI) score for survivors was 5.63±1.89 against 13.6±3.64 for non-survivors which was designed for predicting the disease severity in the series. Early diagnosis and immediate extensive surgical debridement were significant prognostic factors in the management of Fournier gangrene. Individualized reconstructive modalities for wound coverage were useful in that they repaired the tissue defect and improved the quality of life. We are led to conclude that Fournier’s gangrene is a severe condition with a high mortality. The Fournier’s gangrene severity index (FGSI) score at admission serves as a good predictor for the disease severity. Early diagnosis, surgical debridement and aggressive fluid therapy are significant prognostic factors in the management of Fournier gangrene. Individualized reconstructive surgery modalities for wound coverage are useful to correct the tissue defect and improve the quality of life.

Keywords

Fournier’s gangrene / surgical debridement / Fournier’s gangrene severity index

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Longwang Wang, Xiaomin Han, Mei Liu, Yan Ma, Bing Li, Feng Pan, Wencheng Li, Liang Wang, Xiong Yang, Zhaohui Chen, Fuqing Zeng. Experience in management of Fournier’s gangrene: A report of 24 cases. Current Medical Science, 2012, 32(5): 719-723 DOI:10.1007/s11596-012-1024-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

CzymekR., HildebrandP., KleemannM., et al.. New insights into the epidemiology and etiology of Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 33 patients. Infection, 2009, 37(4): 306-312

[2]

LaorE., PalmerL.S., ToliaB.M., et al.. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. J Urol, 1995, 154(1): 89-92

[3]

ErolB., TuncelA., HanciV., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene: overview of prognostic factors and definition of new prognostic parameter. Urology, 2010, 75(5): 1193-1198

[4]

Grabe M, Bjerklund-Johansen TE, Botto H. Guidelines on Urological Infections. European Association of Urology, 2011, Update March 2011:76–78

[5]

SorensenM.D., KriegerJ.N., RivaraF.P., et al.. Fournier’s Gangrene: population based epidemiology and outcomes. J Urol, 2009, 181(5): 2120-2126

[6]

EkeN.. Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg, 2000, 87(6): 718-728

[7]

LevensonR.B., SinghA.K., NovellineR.A.. Fournier gangrene: role of imaging. Radiographics, 2008, 28(2): 519-528

[8]

PapaconstantinouI., YiallourouA.I., DafniosN., et al.. Successful treatment of a severe case of fournier’s gangrene complicating a perianal abscess. Case Report Med, 2011, 2011: 702429

[9]

Villanueva-SaenzE., Martinez Hernandez-MagroP., Valdes OvalleM., et al.. Experience in management of Fournier’s gangrene. Tech Coloproctol, 2002, 6(1): 5-10

[10]

KorkutM., IcozG., DayangacM., et al.. Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003, 46(5): 649-652

[11]

UnalpH.R., KamerE., DericiH., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene: evaluation of 68 patients and analysis of prognostic variables. J Postgrad Med, 2008, 54(2): 102-105

[12]

ErsayA., YilmazG., AkgunY., et al.. Factors affecting mortality of Fournier’s gangrene: review of 70 patients. ANZ J Surg, 2007, 77(1–2): 43-48

[13]

TuncelA., AydinO., TekdoganU., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene: Three years of experience with 20 patients and validity of the Fournier’s gangrene severity index score. Eur Urol, 2006, 50(4): 838-843

[14]

KoukourasD., KallidonisP., PanagopoulosC., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene, a urologic and surgical emergency: presentation of a multi-institutional experience with 45 cases. Urol Int, 2011, 86(2): 167-172

[15]

BartolottaT.V., MidiriM., CarusoG., et al.. Necrotizing fasciitis of the scrotum (Fournier’s gangrene): ultrasound findings. Radiol Med, 2000, 100(6): 510-512

[16]

KickuthR., AdamsS., KirchnerJ., et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Fournier’s gangrene. Eur Radiol, 2001, 11(5): 787-790

[17]

GosiG., MunchZ.. Fournier’s gangrene: early diagnosis is the best remedy. Magy Seb, 2002, 55(1): 27-30

[18]

SinghG., SinhaS.K., AdhikaryS., et al.. Necrotising infections of soft tissues-a clinical profile. Eur J Surg, 2002, 168(6): 366-371

[19]

SugishitaY., NagashimaM., OoshiroM., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene progressing from the buttocks to the scrotum following a perianal abscess. J Infect Chemother, 2008, 14(1): 56-58

[20]

ChenS.Y., FuJ.P., WangC.H., et al.. Fournier gangrene: a review of 41 patients and strategies for reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg, 2010, 64(6): 765-769

[21]

MoslemiM.K., Sadighi GilaniM.A., et al.. Fournier gangrene presenting in a patient with undiagnosed rectal adenocarcinoma: a case report. Cases J, 2009, 2: 9136

[22]

CzymekR., SchmidtA., EckmannC., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene: vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressings. Am J Surg, 2009, 197(2): 168-176

[23]

EkeliusL., BjorkmanH., KalinM., et al.. Fournier’s gangrene after genital piercing. Scand J Infect Dis, 2004, 36(8): 610-612

[24]

PurnellD., HazlettT., AlexanderS.L.. A new weapon against severe sepsis related to necrotizing fasciitis. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2004, 23(1): 18-23

[25]

JallaliN., WitheyS., ButlerP.E.. Hyperbaric oxygen as adjuvant therapy in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Surg, 2005, 189(4): 462-466

[26]

AssenzaM., CozzaV., SaccoE., et al.. VAC (Vacuum Assisted Closure) treatment in Fournier’s gangrene: personal experience and literature review. Clin Ter, 2011, 162(1): e1-e5

[27]

JeongH.J., ParkS.C., SeoI.Y., et al.. Prognostic factors in Fournier gangrene. Int J Urol, 2005, 12(12): 1041-1044

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

127

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/