Anesthetic action of volatile anesthetics by using Paramecium as a model

Abstract

Although empirically well understood in their clinical administration, volatile anesthetics are not yet well comprehended in their mechanism studies. A major conundrum emerging from these studies is that there is no validated model to assess the presumed candidate sites of the anesthetics. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that the single-celled Paramecium could be anesthetized and served as a model organism in the study of anesthetics. We assessed the motion of Paramecium cells with Expert Vision system and the chemoresponse of Paramecium cells with T-maze assays in the presence of four different volatile anesthetics, including isoflurane, sevoflurane, enflurane and ether. Each of those volatiles was dissolved in buffers to give drug concentrations equal to 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 EC50, respectively, in clinical practice. We could see that after application of volatile anesthetics, the swimming of the Paramecium cells was accelerated and then suppressed, or even stopped eventually, and the index of the chemoresponse of the Paramecium cells (denoted as I_che) was decreased. All of the above impacts were found in a concentration-dependent fashion. The biphasic effects of the clinical concentrations of volatile anesthetics on Paramecium simulated the situation of high species in anesthesia, and the inhibition of the chemoresponse also indicated anesthetized. In conclusion, the findings in our studies suggested that the single-celled Paramecium could be anesthetized with clinical concentrations of volatile anesthetics and therefore be utilized as a model organism to study the mechanisms of volatile anesthetics.

Keywords

Paramecium / volatile anesthetics / swimming / chemoresponse

References

[1] FranksN.P., LiebW.R.. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Nature, 1994, 6464(367): 607-614

[2] EckenhoffR.G., JohanssonJ.S.. Molecular interactions between inhaled anesthetics and proteins. Pharmacol Rev, 1997, 49(4): 343-367

[3] PringleM.J., MillerK.W.. Differential effects on phospholipids phase-transitions produced by structurally related long-chain alcohols. Biochemistry, 1979, 18(15): 3314-3320

[4] UedaI., TataraT., ChiouJ.S., et al.. Structure-selective anesthetic action of steroids-anesthetic potency and effects on lipid and protein. Anesth Analg, 1994, 78(4): 718-725

[5] FranksN.P., JenkinsA., ContiE., et al.. Structural basis for the inhibition of firefly luciferase by a general anesthetic. Biophys J, 1998, 75(5): 2205-2211

[6] MihicS.J., YeQ., WickM.J., et al.. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABA(A) and glycine receptors. Nature, 1997, 389(6649): 385-389

[7] CherkinA., CatchpoolJ.F.. Temperature dependence of anesthesia in goldfish. Science, 1964, 144(19): 1460-1462

[8] MorganP.G., SedenskyM., MeneelyP.M.. Multiple sites of action of volatile anesthetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1990, 87(8): 2965-2969

[9] MilneA., BeamishT.. Inhaltional and local anesthetics reduce tactile and thermal responses in mimosa pudica. Can J Anaesth, 1999, 46(3): 287-289

[10] PalmerL.K., WolfeD., KeeleyJ.L., et al.. Volatile anesthetics affect nutrient availability in yeast. Genetics, 2002, 161(2): 563-574

[11] MooreJ.K., ElliottR.A., PayneK., et al.. The effect of anaesthetic agents of induction, recovery and patients preferences in adult day case surgery: a 7-day follow-up randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesth, 2008, 25(11): 876-883

[12] DurieuxM.E.. Editorial I: powerful tools require careful handling—the case of the circadian ketamine effect. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 92(6): 783-792

[13] RamoinoP., FronteP., BeltrameF., et al.. Swimming be havior regulation by GABAB receptors in Paramecium. Exp Cell Res, 2003, 291(2): 398-405

[14] HammondJ.A., PrestonR.R.. Isolation and characterization of magbane, a magnesium-lethal mutant of Paramecium. Genetics, 2001, 158(3): 1061-1069

[15] KlaukeN., PlattnerH.. Imaging of Ca²⁺ transients induced in Paramecium cells by a polyamine secretagogue. J Cell Sci, 1997, 110(Pt8): 975-983

[16] NaitohY., EckertR.. Ionic mechanisms controlling behavioral responses of Paramecium to mechanical stimulation. Science, 1969, 164: 963-965

[17] BellW.E., PrestonR.R., YanoJ., et al.. Genetic dissection of attractant-induced conductances in Paramecium. J Exp Biol, 2007, 210(Pt2): 357-365

[18] HennesseyT.M., FregoL.E., FrancisJ.T.. Oxidants act as chemorepellents in Paramecium by stimulating an electrogenic plasma membrane reductase activity. J Comp Physiol A, 1994, 175(5): 655-665

[19] SchlichtherleI.M., RoosD.S., Van HoutenJ.L.. Cloning and molecular analysis of the bifunctional dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene in the ciliated protozoan Paramecium tetraurelia. Mol Gen Genet, 1996, 250(6): 665-673

[20] FranksN.P., LiebW.R.. Selective actions of volatile general anesthetics at molecular and cellular levels. Brit J Anaesth, 1993, 71(1): 65-76

[21] MasakiE., KawamuraM., KatoF.. Reduction by sevoflurane of adenosine 5′-triphosphate-activated inward current of locus coeruleus neurons in pontine slices of rats. Brain Res, 2001, 921(1–2): 226-232

[22] ClarkK., NelsonD.L.. An automated assay for quantifying the swimming behavior of Paramecium and its use to study cation responses. Cell Motil Cytoskel, 1991, 19(2): 91-98

[23] Van HoutenJ.. A mutant of Paramecium defective in chemotaxis. Science, 1977, 198(23): 746-748

[24] McDougallS.J., PetersJ.H., LaBrantL., et al.. Paired assessment of volatile anesthetic concentrations with synaptic actions recorded in vitro. PLoS One, 2008, 3(10): e3372

[25] EckenhoffR.G., JohanssonJ.S.. On the relevance of “clinically relevant concentrations” of inhaled anesthetics in in vitro experiments. Anesthesiology, 1999, 91(3): 856-860

[26] CampbellD.B., NashH.A.. Use of Drosophila mutants to distinguish among volatile general anesthetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91(6): 2135-2139

[27] JooD.T., GongD., SonnerJ.M., et al.. Blockade of AMPA receptors and volatile anesthetics: reduced anesthetic requirements in GluR2 null mutant mice for loss of the righting reflex and antinociception but not minimum alveolar concentration. Anesthesiology, 2001, 94(3): 478-488

[28] SatoY., KobayashiE., MurayamaT., et al.. Effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor epsilon1 subunit gene disruption of the action of general anesthetic drugs in mice. Anesthesiology, 2005, 102(3): 557-561

[29] MorganP.G., CascorbiH.F.. Effect of anesthetics and a convulsant on normal and mutant Caenorhabditis elegans. Anesthesiology, 1985, 62(6): 738-744

[30] HameroffS.R.. The entwined mysteries of anesthesia and consciousness: Is there a common underlying mechanism?. Anesthesiology, 2006, 105(2): 400-412