Evaluating the growth of pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity on CT: Comparison of volume rendering and thin slice images

Abstract

This study examined the value of volume rendering (VR) interpretation in assessing the growth of pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity (nGGO). A total of 47 nGGOs (average size, 9.5 mm; range, 5.7–20.6 mm) were observed by CT scanning at different time under identical parameter settings. The growth of nGGO was analyzed by three radiologists by comparing the thin slice (TS) CT images of initial and repeat scans with side-by-side cine mode. One week later synchronized VR images of the two scans were compared by side-by-side cine mode to evaluate the nGGO growth. The nodule growth was rated on a 5-degree scale: notable growth, slight growth, dubious growth, stagnant growth, shrinkage. Growth standard was defined as: Density increase ≥ 30 HU and (or) diameter increase (by 20% in nodules ≥10 mm, 30% in nodules of 5–9 mm). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was performed. The results showed that 32 nGGOs met the growth criteria (29 nGGOs showed an increase in density; 1 nGGO showed an increase in diameter; 2 nGGOs showed an increase in both diameter and density). Area under ROC curve revealed that the performance with VR interpretation was better than that with TS interpretation (P<0.01, P<0.05 and P<0.05 for observers A, B and C respectively). Consistency between different observers was excellent with both VR interpretation (κ=0.89 for observers A&C, A&B, B&C) and TS interpretation (κ=0.71 for A&B, κ=0.68 for A&C, κ= 0.74 for B&C), but time spending was less with VR interpretation than with TS interpretation (P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P<0.05 for observers A, B and C, respectively). It was concluded that VR is a useful technique for evaluating the growth of nGGO.

Keywords

computed tomography / ground-glass opacity / pulmonary nodule / growth / volume rendering

References

[1] HenschkeC.I., McCauleyD.I., YankelevitzD.F., et al.. Early lung cancer detection project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet, 1999, 354(9173): 99-105

[2] SwensenS.J., JettJ.R., HartmanT.E., et al.. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo clinic experience. Radiology, 2003, 226(3): 756-761

[3] HenschkeC.I., YankelevitzD.F., MirtchevaR., et al.. CT screening for lung cancer: Frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 178(5): 1053-1057

[4] LibbyD.M., SmithJ.P., AltorkiN.K., et al.. Managing the small pulmonary nodule discovered by CT. Chest, 2004, 125(4): 1522-1529

[5] KakinumaR., OhmatsuH., KanekoM., et al.. Progression of focal pure ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Comput Assist Tomogr, 2004, 28(1): 17-23

[6] ParkC.M., GooJ.M., LeeH.J., et al.. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics, 2007, 27(2): 391-408

[7] CollinsJ., SternE.J.. Ground-glass opacity at CT: the ABCs. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 169(2): 355-367

[8] LeeH.J., GooJ.M., LeeC.H., et al.. Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean J Radiol, 2007, 8(1): 22-31

[9] RevelM.P., BisseryA., BienvenuM., et al.. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?. Radiology, 2004, 231(2): 453-458

[10] YankelevitzD.F., ReevesA.P., KostisW.J., et al.. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology, 2000, 217(1): 251-256

[11] Van KlaverenR.J., OudkerkM., ProkopM., et al.. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(23): 2221-2229

[12] WormannsD., KohlG., KlotzE., et al.. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(1): 86-92

[13] De HoopB., GietemaH., van GinnekenB., et al.. A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: what is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examination?. Eur Radiol, 2009, 19(4): 800-808

[14] RevelM.P., LefortC., BisseryA., et al.. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology, 2004, 231(2): 459-466

[15] LinningE., DaqingM.. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy—a chest CT phantom study. Acad Radiol, 2009, 16(8): 934-939

[16] LindellR.M., HartmanT.E., SwensenS.J., et al.. Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers. Radiology, 2007, 242(2): 555-562

[17] HasegawaM., SoneS., TakashimaS., et al.. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol, 2000, 73(873): 1252-1259

[18] SoneS., NakayamaT., HondaT., et al.. Long-term follow-up study of a population-based 1996–1998 mass screening program for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer, 2007, 58(3): 329-341

[19] CalhounP.S., KuszykB.S., HeathD.G., et al.. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics, 1999, 19(3): 745-764

[20] FishmanE.K., NeyD.R., HeathD.G., et al.. Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. Radiographics, 2006, 26(3): 905-922

[21] FishmanE.K., DrebinB., MagidD., et al.. Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology, 1987, 163(3): 737-738

[22] LiH.M., XiaoX.S., LiuS.Y., et al.. Value of CT volume rendering in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. Chin Comput Med Imag (Chinese), 2005, 11(1): 29-34

[23] PeloschekP., SailerJ., WeberM., et al.. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology, 2007, 243(2): 561-569

[24] ELCAP protocol Available at http://ielcap.org/professionals/docs/ielcap.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2011

[25] NoguchiM., MorikawaA., KawasakiM., et al.. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer, 1995, 75(12): 2844-2852

[26] LindellR.M., HartmanT.E., SwensenS.J., et al.. 5-year lung cancer screening experience: growth curves of 18 lung cancers compared to histologic type, CT attenuation, stage, survival, and size. Chest, 2009, 136(6): 1586-1595

[27] YanoY., MoriM., KagamiS., et al.. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the lung with rapid growth. Intern Med, 2009, 48(15): 1279-1282

[28] DeH.B., GietemaH., van de VS, et al.. Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. Radiology, 2010, 255(1): 199-206