Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of different types of trigeminal neuralgia: Evaluation of quality of life and outcomes

Abstract

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) of the gasserian ganglion is a routine and effective technique for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN). In this study we compared its efficacy in patients with CTN and atypically symptomatic or mixed trigeminal neuralgia (MTN). Fifty-seven patients were treated with RFT for trigeminal neuralgia from June 2006 to February 2009. Thirty patients had CTN, and 27 had MTN. Outcomes were measured by using the visual analog pain scale (VAS) and patients’ reports of quality of life (QOL), medication usage, and complications over a follow-up period of up to 3 years. Our results showed that the patients with MTN were younger, tended to have bilaterial involvement of the first division, and were unresponsive to treatment. All surgeries were completed smoothly. About 86.7% CTN patients and 48.1% MTN patients responded immediately to RFT. The VAS scores were significantly higher in the CTN group than in MTN group (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year pain relief rates were 76.7%, 73.3%, and 73.3% in the CTN group and 46.6%, 41.4%, and 41.4% in the MTN group, respectively. The rates of pain relief for both groups leveled off at 2 years. Complications included numbness, dysesthesia, and anesthesia dolorosa. RFT did not cause any deaths and complications were low. The treatment was very effective for CTN and, to some degrees, effective for MTN. If numbness, dysesthesia, and anesthesia dolorosa are limited to the trigger area, QOL will be greatly improved.

Keywords

facial pain / trigeminal neuralgia / classical trigeminal neuralgia / mixed trigeminal neuralgia / quality of life

References

[1] MillerJ.P., MagillS.T., AcarF., et al.. Predictors of long-term success after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg, 2009, 110(4): 620-626

[2] GüntherT., GerganovV.M., StieglitzL., et al.. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: long-term treatment outcome and comparison with younger patients. Neurosurgery, 2009, 65(3): 477-482

[3] LealP.R., HermierM., FromentJ.C., et al.. Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2010, 152(5): 817-825

[4] ZakrzewskaJ.M., JassimS., BulmanJ.S.. A prospective, longitudinal study on patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the Gasserian ganglion. Pain, 1999, 79(1): 51-58

[5] BennettoL., PatelN.K., FullerG.. Trigeminal neuralgia and its management. BMJ, 2007, 334(7586): 201-205

[6] SweetW.H., WepsicJ.G.. Controlled thermocoagulation of trigeminal ganglion and rootlets for differential destruction of pain fibers. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg, 1974, 40(2): 143-156

[7] KanpolatY., SavasA., BekarA., et al.. Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients. Neurosurgery, 2001, 48(3): 524-32

[8] HanI., ShinD., ChangJ., et al.. Effect of Various Surgical Modalities in Recurrent or Persistent Trigeminal Neuralgia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2010, 88(3): 156-162

[9] GronsethG., CruccuG., AlksneJ., et al.. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology, 2008, 71(15): 1183-1190

[10] ChenR.P., OuyangH.N., WangB.Y., et al.. Quantitative assessment of sensory functions after 3 surgical approaches for trigeminal neuralgia by current perception threshold measurement. J Med Col PLA, 2008, 23(5): 300-307

[11] SpatzA.L., ZakrzewskaJ.M., KayE.J.. Decision analysis of medical and surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: how patient evaluations of benefits and risks affect the utility of treatment decisions. Pain, 2007, 131(3): 302-310

[12] International Headache Society.. International Classifi cation of Headache Disorders. Cephalgia, 2004, 24(Suppl1): S125-126

[13] DhopleA., KwokY., ChinL., et al.. Efficacy and quality of life outcomes in patients with atypical trigeminal neuralgia treated with Gamma-Knife radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 69(2): 397-403

[14] PetitJ.H., HermanJ.M., NagdaS., et al.. Radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: evaluating Quality of Life and treatment outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 56(4): 1147-1153

[15] ScrivamS.J., KeithD.A., MathewsE.S., et al.. Percutaneous stereotactic differential radiofrequency thermal rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999, 57: 104-111

[16] Revuelta-GutierrezR., Lopez-GonzalezM.A., Soto-HernandezJ.L.. Surgery treatment of trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression: 20 years of experience. Surg Neurol, 2006, 66(1): 32-36

[17] ChenJ.F., LeeS.T.. Comparison of percutaneous trigeminal ganglion compression and microvascular decompression for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2003, 105(3): 203-208

[18] HaridasA., MathewsonC., EljamelS.. Long-term results of 405 refractory trigeminal neuralgia surgeries in 256 patients. Zentralbl Neurochir, 2008, 69(4): 170-174

[19] LaghmariM., El OuahabiA., ArkhaY., et al.. Are the destructive neurosurgical techniques as effective as microvascular decompression in the management of trigeminal neuralgia?. Surg Neurol, 2007, 68(5): 505-512

[20] TomaselloF., AlafaciC., AngileriF.F.. Clinical presentation of trigeminal neuralgia and the rationale of microvascular decompression. Neurol Sci, 2008, 29(Suppl1): S191-195

[21] LeonardG., GoffauxP., MathieuD., et al.. Evidence of descending inhibition deficits in atypical but not classical trigeminal neuralgia. Pain, 2009, 147(1–3): 217-223

[22] Hu WH, Zhang K, Zhang JG. Atypical trigeminal neuralgia: A consequence of central sensitization ? Med Hypotheses. 2010, doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2010.01.028

[23] ObermannM., YoonM.S., EseD., et al.. Impaired trigeminal nociceptive processing in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology, 2007, 69(9): 817-818

[24] CruccuG., BiasiottaA., GaleottiF., et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of trigeminal reflex testing in trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology, 2006, 60(1): 139-141

[25] Lorenzonia J, David P, Devriendt D, et al. Patterns of neurovascular compression in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia: A high-resolution MRI-based study. Eur J Radiol. 2009, doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.017

[26] FraioliM.F., CristinoB., MoschettoniL., et al.. Validity of percutaneous controlled radiofrequency thermocoag ulation in the treatment of isolated third division trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol, 2009, 71(2): 180-183

[27] MengF.G., WuC.Y., LiuY.G., et al.. Virtual reality imaging technique in percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy for intractable trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16(3): 449-451

[28] KarolE.A., KarolB., PerezA., et al.. A multiarray mapping method to minimize morbidity from thermocoagulation as treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol, 2009, 71(4): 411-418

[29] SpatzA.L., ZakrzewskaJ.M., KayE.J.. Decision analysis of medical and surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: How patient evaluations of benefits and risks affect the utility of treatment decisions. Pain, 2007, 131(3): 302-310

[30] WilsonI.B., ClearyP.D.. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA, 1995, 273(1): 59-65