PDF
Abstract
In order to investigate the relationship between the extent of tumor invasion and the tumor size, axillary lymph nodes metastasis, Her-2 gene overexpression, and histologic grading in breast invasive ductal carcinoma as well as the optimal extent of excision during the breast-serving surgery, the clinical data of 104 patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma who had received modified radical mastectomy were analyzed. The correlation analysis on invasive extent, which was evaluated by serial sections at an interval of 0.5 cm from 4 different directions taking the focus as the centre, and the tumor size, axillary lymph nodes metastasis, Her-2 gene overexpression, and histologic grading was processed. There was a significant correlation between invasive extent and tumor size (r=0.766, P<0.01), and lymph nodes metastases (r=0.574, P<0.01), but there was no significant correlation between invasive extent and Her-2 expression (r=0.106, P>0.05), and histologic grading (r=0.228, P>0.05). The 100% negative rate of infiltration in patients without nipple discharge with tumor size <2, 2–3 and >3 cm was obtained at 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 cm away from the tumor respectively. It is concluded that the performance of breast-serving surgery in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma should be evaluated by tumor size in combination with axillary lymph nodes involvement to decide the possibility of breast-serving and the secure excision extent.
Keywords
breast neoplasm
/
tumor invasion
/
mastectomy, segmental
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Chunping Liu, Huaxiong Pan, Zhi Li, Lan Shi, Tao Huang.
Histopathological features of invasion of breast invasive ductal carcinoma and safety of breast-conserving surgery.
Current Medical Science, 2009, 29(1): 50-52 DOI:10.1007/s11596-009-0110-8
| [1] |
FisherB., BauerM., MargoleseR., et al. . Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 1985, 312(11): 665-673
|
| [2] |
VeronesiU., CascinelliN., MarianiL., et al. . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(16): 1227-1232
|
| [3] |
BartelinkH., HoriotJ.C., PoortmansP.M., et al. . Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. JCO, 2007, 25(22): 3259-3265
|
| [4] |
VeronesiU., SalvadoriB., LuiniA., et al. . Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomized trials on 1973 patients. Eur J Cancer, 1995, 31A(10): 1574-1579
|
| [5] |
van DongenJ.A., VoogdA.C., FentimanI.S., et al. . Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(14): 1143-1150
|
| [6] |
CefaroG.A., GenovesiD., MarcheseR., et al. . Predictors of local recurrence after conservative surgery and whole-breast irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2006, 98(3): 329-335
|
| [7] |
MericF., MirzaN.Q., VlastosG., et al. . Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer, 2003, 97(4): 926-933
|
| [8] |
McIntoshA., FreedmanG., EisenbergD., et al. . Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol., 2007, 30(2): 146-151
|
| [9] |
LiuJ., FangZ.Y., YuY., et al. . Study on safe extent of breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer. Chin J Clinical Oncology (Chinese), 2005, 32(15): 856-860
|
| [10] |
CabiogluN., HuntK.K., SahinA.A., et al. . Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(4): 1458-1471
|
| [11] |
WazerD.E., Schmidt-UllrichR.K., SchmidC.H., et al. . The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 38(2): 291-299
|
| [12] |
CelliniC., HollenbeckS.T., ChristosP., et al. . Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol, 2004, 11(10): 915-920
|
| [13] |
CaoD., LinC., WooS.H., et al. . Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for re-excisions. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005, 29(12): 1625-1632
|