Evaluation of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction with intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography

Abstract

The myocardial viability after myocardial infarction was evaluated by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. Intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed on 18 patients with myocardial infarction before coronary revascularization. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 3 months after coronary revascularization. Segmental wall motion was assessed using 18-segment LV model and classified as normal, hypokinesis, akinesis and dyskinesis. Viable myocardium was defined by evident improvement of segmental wall motion 3 months after coronary revascularization. Myocardial perfusion was assessed by visual interpretation and divided into 3 conditions: homogeneous opacification; partial or reduced opaciflcation or subendocardial contrast defect; contrast defect. The former two conditions were used as the standard to define the viable myocardium. The results showed that 109 abnormal wall motion segments were detected among 18 patients with myocardial infarction, including 47 segments of hypokinesis, 56 segments of akinesis and 6 segments of dyskinesis. The wall motion of 2 segments with hypokinesis before coronary revascularization which showed homogeneous opacification, 14 of 24 segments with hypokinese and 20 of 24 segments with akinese before coronary revascularization which showed partial or reduced opaciflcation or subendocardial contrast defect was improved 3 months after coronary revascularization. In our study, the sensitivity and specificity of evaluation of myocardial viability after myocardial infarction by intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography were 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. It was concluded that intravenous real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography could accurately evaluate myocardial viability after myocardial infarction.

Keywords

myocardial infarction / viability / myocardial contrast echocardiography / perfusion

References

[1] BoaJ. J., PattonJ. A., PoldermansD.. 18F-fluorodeoxyflucose imaging with positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography: cardiac applications. Semin Nucl Med, 2000, 30: 281-298

[2] MatsunariI., BoningG., ZieglerS. I., et al.. Attenuation-corrected ^99mTc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography in the detection of viable myocardium: comparison with positron emission tomography using 18F-fulorodeoxyglucose. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998, 32: 927-935

[3] BiX. J., DengY. B., ChangQ., et al.. Evaluation of myocardial viability by quantitative tissue velocity imaging combined with low dose dobutamine echocardiography. Chin J Ultrasonogr (Chinese), 2004, 13: 179-182

[4] deFilippiC. R., WillettD. L., IraniW. N., et al.. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting recovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease. Circulation, 1995, 92: 2863-2868

[5] LiP., DengY. B., YangH. Y., et al.. Myocardial perfusion assessed by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography before and after bypass surgery in patients with coronary artery disease. Chin J Ultrasonogr (Chinese), 2007, 16(4): 19-22

[6] MezaM. F., RameeS., CollinsT., et al.. Knowledge of perfusion and contractile reserve improves the predictive value of recovery of regional myocardial function postrevascularization: A study using the combination of myocardial contrast echocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography. Circulation, 1997, 96: 3459-3465

[7] WuS. N., ZhangS. W., WuS. B., et al.. Assessment of viable myocardium after myocardial infarction using intravenous myocardial contrast imaging. Chin J Prac Inter Med (Chinese), 2002, 22: 721-722

[8] BalcellsE., PowersE. R., LepperW., et al.. Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 41: 827-833

[9] OhmoriK., CotterB., LeistadE., et al.. Assessment of myocardial postreperfusion viability by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography: analysis of the intensity and texture of opacification. Circulation, 2001, 103: 2021-2027

[10] RagostaM., CamaranoG., KaulS., et al.. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1992, 85: 1699-1705

[11] WadaH., YasuT., KotsukaH., et al.. Evaluation of transmural myocardial perfusion by ultra-harmonic myocardial contrast echocardiography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Circ J, 2005, 69: 1041-1046

[12] ShimoniS., FrangogiannisN. G., AggeliC. J., et al.. Microvascular structural correlates of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction implications for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Circulation, 2002, 106: 950-956

[13] KlonerR. A., RudeR. E., CarlsonN., et al.. Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion: which comes first?. Circulation, 1980, 62: 945-952