Relationship between pronuclear scoring and embryo quality and implantation potential in IVF-ET

Abstract

To assess the relationship between pronuclear scoring and day-3 embryo quality and pregnancy outcome and to determine the clinical value of pronuclear stage scoring system in human in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program, a pronuclear scoring system was used to score zygotes 16–20 h after insemination during conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The embryos were classified into groups Z1, Z2, Z3 and Z4. Comparisons were made of the rates of arrested embryos and excellent embryos on day 3. Comparisons of pregnancy outcome were made only in those patients in whom cohorts of similarly Z-scored embryos were transferred. The results showed that there were less arrested embryos and more excellent embryos on day 3 in groups Z1 and Z2 than those in group Z3 and Z4. More embryos arrested and less excellent embryos developed in group Z4 than group Z3. The clinical pregnancy rates resulting from the transfer of single pronuclear score homologous embryo types were similar among groups Z1, Z2 and Z3. Implantation rates of group Z1 were higher (P<0.05) than that of group Z3. These findings suggests that pronuclear scoring can predict developmental ability on day 3 and implantation potential. A evaluation that combines the Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology is useful in the determination of the most viable embryos and the number of embryos for transfer.

Keywords

in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer / morphological scoring / embryo quality, pregnancy outcome / pronuclear scoring

References

[1] GrahamJ., HanT., PorterR., et al.. Day 3 morphology is a poor predictor of blastocyst quality in extended culture. Fertil Steril, 2000, 74(3): 495-497

[2] ScottL., AlveroR., LeondiresM., et al.. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(11): 2394-2403

[3] NagyZ. P., DozortsevD., DiamondM., et al.. Pronuclear morphology evaluation with subsequent evaluation of embryo morphology significantly increases implantation rates. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(1): 67-74

[4] BoriniA. L. C., CattoliM., SereniE., et al.. Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. Reprod Biomed Online, 2005, 10(5): 653-668

[5] ScottL., FinnA., LearyT. O., et al.. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(1): 230-240

[6] ScottL.. Pronuclear score as a predictor of embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003, 6(2): 201-214

[7] LanK. C., HuangF. J., LinY. C., et al.. The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18(6): 1299-1306

[8] PayneD., FlaheityS. P., BanyM. F., et al.. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod, 1997, 12(3): 532-541

[9] EdirisingheW. R., JemmottR., SmithC., et al.. Association of pronuclear Z score with rates of aneuploidy in in vitro-fertilised embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2005, 17(5): 529-534

[10] ChenC. K., ShenG. Y., HorngS. G., et al.. The relationship of pronuclear stage morphology and chromosome status at cleavage stage. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2003, 20(10): 413-420

[11] GianaroliL., MagliM. C., FerrarettiA. P., et al.. Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(2): 341-349