Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases

Haining Luo , Guijin Zhu , Qun Liu , Wen Chen , Zhou Li

Current Medical Science ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (25) : 315 -317.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (25) : 315 -317. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-007-0325-5
Article

Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In order to establish a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of chromosomal diseases in general IVF laboratory, the methods that are most commonly used in the embryo biopsy, fixation of blastomere and fluorescence in situ hybridization were compared. The three aspects of PGD were analyzed respectively. There was no significant difference in further development capacity of embryos between mechanical (79.7%) and chemical biopsy group (78.6%) (P>0.05). In this study, more cells were successfully fixed with the Tween/HCL method (93.8%) than with the methanol/acetic acid method (80.5%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in cytoplasm remains between methanol/acetic acid method and Tween/HCL method (P>0.05). The hybridization efficiency of fluorescence in situ hybridization was 89.5% in successive denaturation method and 90.9% in codenaturation method with the difference being not significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, the mechanical or chemical method, Tween/HCL fixation method and codenaturation fluorescence in situ hybridization method can constitute a simple and useful way for PGD of chromosomal diseases.

Keywords

biopsy / fixation / fluorescence in situ hybridization / preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haining Luo, Guijin Zhu, Qun Liu, Wen Chen, Zhou Li. Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases. Current Medical Science, 2007, 27(25): 315-317 DOI:10.1007/s11596-007-0325-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

GrifoJ. A., BoyleA., FischerE., et al.. Preembryo biopsy and analysis of blastomeres by in situ hybridization. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1990, 163(6Pt1): 2013-2019

[2]

TakeuchiK., SandowB. A., MorsyM., et al.. Preclinical models for human pre-embryo biopsy and genetic diagnosis. I. Efficiency and normalcy of mouse pre-embryo development after different biopsy techniques. Fertil Steril, 1992, 57(2): 425-430

[3]

MunneS., WeierH. U., SteinJ., et al.. A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assit Reprod Genet, 1993, 10(1): 82-89

[4]

CoonenE., DumoulinJ. C., RamaekersF. C., et al.. Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod, 1994, 9(3): 533-537

[5]

LiuQ., ZhuG. J.. Effects of cleavage stage biopsy on in vitro development of human embryos. Chin J Obstet Gynecol (Chinese), 2002, 37(5): 274-277

[6]

WongB. C., BoydC. A., LanzendorfS. E.. Randomized controlled study of human zona pellucida dissection using the zona infrared laser optical system: evaluation of blastomere damage, embryo development, and subsequent hatching. Fertil Steril, 2003, 80(5): 1249-1254

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

112

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/