A case-control study on high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss in seven cities of Shandong province

Wenying Nie , Hanrong Wu , Yisheng Qi , Qian Lin , Lili Xiang , Hui Li , Yinghui Li

Current Medical Science ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (30) : 217 -220.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2007, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (30) : 217 -220. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-007-0230-y
Article

A case-control study on high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss in seven cities of Shandong province

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To investigate the high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss and to provide information for preventing the development of hearing loss and delaying its progression, from May 2003 to June 2006, neonates who failed to pass the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) were referred to Jinan Newborn Hearing Screening and Rehabilitation Center from 7 newborn hearing screening centers in seven cities of Shandong province. One-to-one pair-matched case-control method was employed for statistical analysis of the basic features of definitely identified cases. High-risk factors relating to the bilateral hearing loss were evaluated by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Our results revealed that 721 transferred newborns who didn’t pass the hearing screening received audiological and medical evaluation and 367 were confirmed to have hearing loss. Of them, 177 neonates with hearing loss who met the matching requirements were included in the study as subjects. Univariate analysis showed that high-risk factors related to hearing loss incuded age of father, education backgrounds of parents, parity, birth weight, gestational weeks, craniofacial deformity, history of receiving treatment in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), neonatal disease, family history of otopathy and family history of congenital hearing loss. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that 4 independent risk factors were related to bilateral hearing loss, including parity (OR=16.285, 95% CI 3.379–78.481), neonatal disease (OR=34.968, 95% CI 2.720–449.534), family history of congenital hearing loss (OR=69.488, 95% CI 4.417–1093.300) and birth weight (OR=0.241, 95% CI 0.090–0.648). It is concluded that parity, neonatal disease and family history of hearing loss are the promoting factors of bilateral hearing loss in neonates and appropriate intervention measures should be taken to deal with the risk factors.

Keywords

neonate / hearing screening / high-risk factors / bilateral ears / case control study

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenying Nie, Hanrong Wu, Yisheng Qi, Qian Lin, Lili Xiang, Hui Li, Yinghui Li. A case-control study on high-risk factors for newborn hearing loss in seven cities of Shandong province. Current Medical Science, 2007, 27(30): 217-220 DOI:10.1007/s11596-007-0230-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.. Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guideline for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Pediatrics, 2000, 106(4): 798-817

[2]

BergA. L., SpitzerJ. B., TowersH. M., et al.. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission. Pediatrics, 2005, 114(6): 933-938

[3]

UusK., BamfordJ.. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics, 2006, 117: e887-893

[4]

VohrB. R., WidenJ. E., Cone-WessonB., et al.. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: char-acteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery. Ear Hear, 2000, 21(5): 373-382

[5]

RovetJ., WalkerW., BlissB., et al.. Long-team hearing impairment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr, 1996, 128(6): 776-783

[6]

Ari-Even RothD., HildesheimerM., Maayan-MetzgerA., et al.. Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birthweight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2006, 91: F257-262

[7]

IwasakiS., YamashitaM., MaedaM., et al.. Audiological outcome of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a prospective Study. Audiol Neurootol, 2006, 12: 31-36

[8]

QiuX. Q., ZengX. Y., QinD. D., et al.. A case-control study on the risk factor of perinatals’ congenital malformations in seven cities of Guangxi. Chin J Epidemiol (Chinese), 2003, 24(6): 512-515

[9]

ChenP., TangA. Z., SuJ. P., et al.. Characteristics of hearing loss in 299 high-risk neonates. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chinese), 2005, 40(5): 335-338

[10]

CastillaE. E., OrioliI. M.. Prevalence rates of microtia in South America. Int J Epidemiol, 1986, 15(3): 364-368

[11]

DuJ. M., GuoW. H., HanJ., et al.. Case control study on risk factors of congenital microtia. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (Chinese), 2006, 41(2): 107-111

[12]

WeichboldV., Nekahm-HeisD., Welzl-MuellerK., et al.. Universal newborn hearing screening and postnatal hearing loss. Pediatrics, 2006, 117: e631-636

[13]

NorrisV. W., ArnosK. S., HanksW. D., et al.. Does universal newborn hearing screening identify all children with GJB2 (Connexin 26) deafness? Penetrance of GJB2 deafness. Ear Hear, 2006, 27(6): 732-741

[14]

RaveccaF., BerrettiniS., ForliF., et al.. Cx26 gene mutations in idiopathic progressive hearing loss. J Otolaryngol, 2005, 34: 126-134

[15]

PagarkarW., Bitner-GlindziczM., KnightJ.. Late postnatal onset of hearing loss due to GJB2 mutations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2006, 70(9): 1119-1124

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

103

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/