Semi-skeletonized internal mammary grafts and phrenic nerve injury: Cause-and-effect analysis

Abstract

Phrenic nerve injury after cardiac surgery increases postoperative pulmonary complications. The purpose of this study was to analyze the causes and effects of phrenic nerve injury after cardiac surgery. Prospectively collected data on 2084 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery from Jan. 1995 to Feb. 2002 were analyzed. Twenty-eight preoperative and operation related variables were subjected to logistic analysis with the end point being phrenic nerve injury. Then phrenic nerve injury and 6 perioperative morbidities were included in the analysis as variables to determine their independent predictive value for perioperative pulmonary morbidity. An identical approach was used to identify the independent risk factors for perioperative mortality. There were 53 phrenic nerve injuries (2.5 %). There was no phrenic nerve injury in non-coronary surgery or coronary surgery using conduits other than the internal mammary artery. The independent risk factors for phrenic nerve injury were the use of internal mammary artery (Odds ratio (OR)=14.5) and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=2.9). Phrenic nerve injury was an independent risk factor (OR=8.1) for perioperative pulmonary morbidities but not for perioperative mortality. Use of semi-skeletonized internal mammary artery harvesting technique and drawing attention to possible vascular or mechanical causes of phrenic nerve injury may reduce its occurrence. Unilateral phrenic nerve injury, although rarely life-threatening, is an independent risk factor for postoperative respiratory complications. When harvesting internal mammary arteries, it should be kept in mind avoiding stretching, compromising, or inadvertently dissecting phrenic nerve is as important as avoiding damage of internal mammary artery itself.

Keywords

phrenic nerve injury / semi-skeletonized internal mammary artery / independent risk factor / pulmonary morbidity / mortality

References

[1] AbdA. G., BraunN. M. T., BaskinM. I., et al.. Diaphragmatic dysfunction after open heart surgery: treatment with a rocking bed. Ann Intern Med, 1989, 111: 881-86

[2] LedermanR. J., BreuerA. C., HansonM. R., et al.. Peripheral nervous system complications of coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Neurol, 1982, 12: 297-301

[3] O’BrienJ. W., JohnsonS. H., VanSteynS. J., et al.. Effects of internal mammary artery dissection on phrenic nerve perfusion and function. Ann Thorac Surg, 1991, 52: 182-8

[4] BenjaminJ. J., CascadeP. N., RubenfireM., et al.. Left lower lobe atelectasis and consolidation following cardiac surgery: the effect of topical cooling on the phrenic nerve. Radiology, 1982, 142: 11-4

[5] ScannellS. C.. Discussion: McGoon D C, Mankin H T, Kirlin J W. Results of open heart operation for acquired aortic valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1963, 45: 47-66

[6] DimopoulouI., DaganouM., DafniU., et al.. Phrenic nerve dysfunction after cardiac operation: Electrophysiologic evaluation for risk factors. Chest, 1998, 113: 8-14

[7] EfthimiouJ., ButlerJ., WoodhamC., et al.. Diaphragm paralysis following cardiac surgery: Role of phrenic nerve cold injury. Ann Thorac Surg, 1991, 52: 1005-8

[8] CohenA., KatzM., KatzR., et al.. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995, 109: 574-81

[9] EfthimiouJ., ButlerJ., BensonM. K., et al.. Bilateral diaphragm paralysis after cardiac surgery with topic hypothermia. Thorax, 1991, 46: 351-54

[10] KohorsW. R., SchonfeldS. A., AltmanM.. Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis following topic cardiac hypothermia. Chest, 1984, 85: 65-8

[11] NorrisA. H. N., ShockW., WagmanI. H.. Age changes in the maximal conduction velocity of motor fibers of human ulnar nerves. J Appl Physio, 1959, 5: 589-93

[12] LytleB. W., BlackstoneE. H., LoopF. D., et al.. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 117: 855-72

[13] BuxtonB. F., KomedaM., FullerJ. A., et al.. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery: risk-adjusted survival. Circulation, 1998, 98(Suppl): II1-II6

[14] DengY. Z., BythK., PatersonH. S.. Semi-skeletonized internal mammary artery grafts and sternal wound complications. Asian Cardiovase & Thorac Ann, 2004, 12: 227-232

[15] WilcoxP., BaileE. M., HardsJ., et al.. Phrenic nerve function and its relationship to atelectasis after coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest, 1988, 93: 693-8

[16] KatsM. G., KatzR., SchachnerA., et al.. Phrenic nerve injury after coronary artery bypass grafting: Will it go away?. Ann Thorac Surg, 1988, 65: 32-5

[17] EspositoR. A., SpencerF. C.. The effect of pericardial insulation on hypothermic phrenic nerve injury during open-heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1987, 43: 303-8

[18] SunderlandS.. Nerve and nerve injuries, 19782nd ed.Edinburgh, Churchill, Livingstone

[19] DengY. Z., BythK., PatersonH. S.. Phrenic nerve injury associated with high RIMA harvesting. Ann Thorac Surgery, 2003, 76: 459-63

[20] WilcoxP. G., PareP. D., PardyR. L.. Recovery after unilateral phrenic injury associated with coronary artery revascularization. Chest, 1990, 98: 661-6