Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve by noninvasive transthoracic doppler echocardiography in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries

Yang Ya , Thomas Bartel , Li Zhian , Raimund Erbel

Current Medical Science ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5) : 590 -593.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5) : 590 -593. DOI: 10.1007/BF02896027
Article

Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve by noninvasive transthoracic doppler echocardiography in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The measurement of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with invasive intracoronary Doppler flow wire technique (ICD) was validated and the pathological factors which influence CFVR in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries were analyzed. CFVR was determined successfully in left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 37 of 40 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries (men 22, women 15, age 20–75 years, mean age 54±12 years). Coronary flow velocity was measured in the distal LAD by TTDE with contrast enhancement at baseline and during intravenous adenosine infusion of 140 μg/kg per min within 48 h after ICD technique. Average peak velocity at baseline (APVb), average peak velocity during hyperemia (APVh) and CFVR determined from TTDE were correlated closely with those from ICD measurements (APVb: y=0.64x+5.04,r=0.86,P<0.001; APVh: y=0.63x+14.36,r=0.82,P<0.001; CFVR: y=0.65x+0.92,r=0.88,P<0.001). For CFVR measurements, the mean differences between TTDE and ICD methods were 0.12±0.39. CFVR in patients with history of hypertension was significantly lower than that in patients without history of hypertension (P<0.05). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed in 34 patients. Plaque formation was found in LAD by IVUS in 17 (50%) patients. No significant difference in CFVR was found between the patients without plaque formation (3.11±0.49) and those with plaque formation (2.76±0.53,P=0.056). It is suggested that TTDE with contrast enhancement provides reliable measurement of APV and CFVR in the distal LAD. The early stage of atherosclerosis could be detected by IVUS, which may be normal in angiography. CFVR is impaired in patients with history of hypertension compared with that in patients without history of hypertension.

Keywords

coronary flow velocity reserve / angiographically normal coronary arteries / thansthoracic Doppler echocardiography / intracoronary Doppler

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yang Ya, Thomas Bartel, Li Zhian, Raimund Erbel. Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve by noninvasive transthoracic doppler echocardiography in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Current Medical Science, 2005, 25(5): 590-593 DOI:10.1007/BF02896027

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ErbelR, GeJ, BockischA, et al. . Value of intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler in the differentiation of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J, 1996, 17: 880-880

[2]

GouldK L, LipscombK, HamiltonG W. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33: 87-87

[3]

CaiatiC, MontaldoC, ZeddaN, et al. . Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 34: 1193-1193

[4]

BartelT, MllerS, BaumgartD, et al. . Improved high-frequency transthoracic flow velocity measurement in the left anterior descending coronary artery after intravenous peripheral injection of Levovist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1999, 12: 252-252

[5]

KatzL N, LinderF. Quantitative relation between reactive hyperemia and the myocardial ischemia which it follows. Am J Physiol, 1939, 126: 283-283

[6]

ErbelR, GeJ, BockischA, et al. . Value if intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler in the differentiation of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J, 1996, 17: 880-880

[7]

GouldK L, LipscombK, HamiltonG W. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33: 87-87

[8]

SenneffM, GeltmanE, BergmanS, et al. . Noninvasive delineation of the effects of moderate aging on myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Med, 1991, 81: 1319-1319

[9]

KernM J, BachR G, MechemC, et al. . Variations in normal coronary vasodilator reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation, and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996, 28: 1154-1154

[10]

HongoM, NakatsukaT, WatanabeN, et al. . Effects of heart rate on phasic coronary blood flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with normal coronary arteries: a study with an intravascular Doppler catheter and spectral analysis. Am Heat J, 1994, 127: 545-545

[11]

KlockeF J. Measurements of coronary flow reserve defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation, 1987, 76: 1183-1183

[12]

HamoudaM S, KassemH K, SalamaM, et al. . Evaluation of coronary flow reserve in hypertensive patients by dipyridamole transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol, 2000, 86: 305-305

[13]

StrauerB. Left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve. Cardiology, 1992, 81: 1274-1274

[14]

TanakaM, FujiwaraH, OnoderaT, et al. . Quantitative analysis of narrowing of intramyocardial small arteries in normal hearts, hypertensive heart, and hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation, 1987, 75: 1130-1130

[15]

BolliR, TrianaJ, JeroudiM. Prolonged impairment of coronary vasodilation after reversible ischemia: evidence of microvascular stuning. Circ Res, 1990, 67: 332-332

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

84

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/