Total arterial revascularization with internal mammary artery or radial artery π graft configuration

Abstract

To investigate the clinical use of π graft in total arterial revascularization and its outcomes, a retrospective analysis of 23 patients out of 1000 patients undergoing total arterial coronary bypass surgery with a π graft between September 1994 and December 2004 was performed. In the selected patients for the management of triple vessel disease with middle diagonal/intermediate ramus disease such that a skip with the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) or radial artery (RA), the main stem of π graft, to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) will not work and the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) or right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) cannot pick up the diagonal/intermediate ramus, hence the LAD and diagonal/intermediate ramus were grafted with a mini Y graft using the distal segment of LIMA, RIMA, RA or RGEA, together with the bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) or LIMA-RA T graft to compose π graft. Twenty-three patients (18 males, 5 females) underwent the π graft procedure. There were no deaths or episodes of myocardial infarction, stroke, and deep sternal wound infection. One patient required reopening for controlling bleeding. Until the end of 2004, during a mean follow-up of 81.0±28.4 months, no angina needing re-intervention or operative therapy or coronary related death occurred. In conclusion, in patients with specific coronary artery anatomy/stenosis, the BIMA (sometimes LIMA with RA or RGEA) π graft can be successfully performed for total arterial revascularization with good midterm outcomes.

Keywords

coronary artery bypass / total arterial revascularization / π graft

References

[1] HoriiT, SumaH. Semiskeletonization of the internal thoracic artery: alternative harvest technique. Ann Thorac Surg, 1997, 63(3): 867-867

[2] DengY Z, PatersonH S, BythK. Semi-skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting and sternal wound complications. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2004, 12(3): 227-227

[3] KejriwalN K, PatersonH S. Retrosternal fat pad for prevention of suppurative sternitis. Ann Thorac Surg, 1997, 63(5): 1484-1484

[4] LoopF D, LytleB W, CosgroveD M, et al. . Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med, 1986, 314(1): 1-1

[5] BuxtonB F, KomedaM, FullerJ A, et al. . Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting may improve outcome of coronary artery surgery: risk-adjusted survival. Circulation, 1998, 98(Suppl): II-1

[6] LytleB W, BiackstoneE H, LoopF D, et al. . Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999, 117(65): 855-855

[7] TaggartD P, D'AmicoR, AltmanD G. Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet, 2001, 358(9285): 870-870

[8] IoannidisJ P A, GalanosO, KatrisisD, et al. . Early mortality and morbidity of bilateral verse single internal thoracic artery revascularization: propensity and risk modeling. JACC, 2001, 37(2): 521-521

[9] McBrideL R, BarnerH B. The left internal mammary artery as a sequential graft to the left anterior descending system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1983, 86(5): 703-703

[10] TectorA J, SchmahlT M, CaninoV R, et al. . The role of the sequential internal mammary artery graft in coronary surgery. Circulation, 1994, 70(3): I222-I222

[11] BronchekL I, BurlingameM W, VazalesB E, et al. . Maximal utilization of the left internal mammary artery for coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 1996, 61(6): 1848-1848

[12] OdayanM K, PatersonH S. Myocardial revascularization with the left internal thoracic artery Y graft configuration. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999, 67(5): 1359-1359