Dynamic observation on the effects of different suture techniques on the biomechanical properties in the healing of tendons

Wan Shengxiang , Hong Guangxiang , Wang Fabin

Current Medical Science ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5) : 561 -564.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5) : 561 -564. DOI: 10.1007/BF02896018
Article

Dynamic observation on the effects of different suture techniques on the biomechanical properties in the healing of tendons

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To identify the best suture techniques for the tendon repair, the biomechanical properties of tendons sutured by different methods were dynamically examined. 140 chickens were divided into 2 groups equally: group A and group B. The tendon of the right side was subjected to injury-repair process, and the tendons of the left sides served as controls in both groups. In group A, “figure-of-8” suture, modified Kessler suture and Bunnell suture were used for the 2nd to 4th paws respectively, while in group B, Kleinert suture, Tsuge suture and Ikuta suture were used. On the day 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 after operation, 10 animals were sacrificed and the flexor tendons of both sides were harvested for strength test. The results showed that the initial strength of the repaired tendons and the strength after 6 weeks following tendon cut were far below those of intact tendons, irrespective of suture techniques used. With the 6 techniques, thePmax of tendons repaired by Tsuge suture was increased continually, reaching the highest value on the 42nd day. ThePmax of tendons sutured by the modified Kessler suture was slightly lower than that by Tsuge suture, but it was increased steadily in healing. The tendons repaired by figure-of-8 suture yielded the lowestPmax. It was concluded that Tsuge suture and modified Kessler suture were the best techniques for tendon repair.

Keywords

tendon / suture / biomechanics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wan Shengxiang, Hong Guangxiang, Wang Fabin. Dynamic observation on the effects of different suture techniques on the biomechanical properties in the healing of tendons. Current Medical Science, 2005, 25(5): 561-564 DOI:10.1007/BF02896018

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AmadioP C, HunterJ M. HunterJ M, SchneiderL H, MackinE J. Prognostic factors in flexor tendon surgery inzone 2. Tendon Surgery in the Hand, 1978, St. Louis, CV, Mosby: 138-147

[2]

XuJ G, GuY D, WangH, et al. . Experimental study of sodium hyaluronate products on prevention of tendon adhesion. Chin J Surg (Chinese), 1995, 33(9): 529-529

[3]

LvD C, YanZ Q, LiuZ M, et al. . Chitosan membrane in prevention of flexor tendon adhesion: an experimental study in chicken. Chin J Hand Surg (Chinese), 1996, 12: 49-49

[4]

WangJ C, LuoY X, LiJ Y, et al. . A laboratory study for effect of triamcinclon on the adhesion of tendon. Acta Univ Med Tongji (Chinese), 1994, 23(5): 392-392

[5]

YeG M, HouC L. Experimental study for the prevention of rabbit flexor tendon adhesion with chitosan. Chin J Hand Surg (Chinese), 1994, 10(1): 51-51

[6]

MuS X, GeW X, ChengD Y, et al. . Experimental study of tendon sheaths repaired by Venae Magna to prevent adhesion of tendons. Chin J Orthop (Chinese), 1997, 17(7): 445-445

[7]

SongX J, PanD D, LinB, et al. . Wrapping of flexor tendon anastomotic site with peritenon graft for prevention of adhesion. Chin J Hand Surg (Chinese), 1997, 13(2): 93-93

[8]

KleinertH E, KutzJ E, AtasoyE, et al. . Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am, 1973, 13(2): 93-93

[9]

SrricklandJ W, GlogovacS V. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg, 1980, 5(6): 537-537

[10]

GelbermanR H, MenonJ, GonsalvesM, et al. . The effects of mobilization on vascularization of healing flexor tendons in dogs. Clin Orthop, 1980, 153: 283-283

[11]

WangS F. Repair of Hand Trauma (Chinese), 1977, Beijing, Beijing Press Housing: 154-161

[12]

IkutaY. Replantation surgery in the upper extremity. Handchirugie, 1977, 9: 51-51

[13]

SmallJ O, BrennenM D, ColvilleJ. Early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg (Br), 1989, 14: 383-383

[14]

LinG T, WuH Z, JianS X, et al. . Analysis of biomechanics of flexor tendon suture techniques. Med Biomechanics, 1995, 10(3): 138-138

[15]

PanC Z, TangJ B, XieR G, et al. . Biomechanical comparison of 5 flexor tendon repair techniques. Chin J Orthop (Chinese), 1999, 19(6): 367-367

[16]

TangJ B, ShiD. Subdivision of flexor tendon “no man's land” and different treatment methods in each subzone: a preliminary report. Chin Med J (Eng), 1992, 105: 60-60

[17]

HitchockT F, LightT R, BunchW H, et al. . The effects of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg (Am), 1987, 12: 590-590

[18]

FeehanL M, BeauchemeJ G. Early tensile properties of healing chicken flexor tendons: early controlled passive motion versus postoperative immobilization. J Hand Surg (Am), 1990, 15: 63-63

[19]

MasonM L, AllenH S. The rate of healing of tendons: an experimental study of tensile strength. Ann Surg, 1941, 113: 424-424

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

83

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/