Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice spiral CT: A comparison with selective X-ray coronary angiography

Abstract

The role of 16-slice spiral CT was evaluated in the diagnosis of coronary stenosis, with selective X-ray coronary angiography (SCA) serving as the reference standard. Sixty-five patients who were suspected of having coronary heart disease, without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass-grafting, were investigated using 16-slice CT. Eight patients with pre-scan heart rate of more than 80 beast/min were given β-blockers. After the retrospectively ECG-gated axial imaging reconstruction, volume redering (VR), multi-planar reconstruction (MPR), curved MPR and maximum intensity projection (MIP) were used to reconstruct. Every segment of coronary artery with a diameter ≥1.5 mm was assessed, and the presence on CT with a stenosis exceeding 50% diameter reduction was compared with that on SCA. The reasons which lead to some segments unevaluable were analysed. Compared with SCA, 93% coronary segments and 94% main branches were evaluable. Residual cardiac motion artifacts, severe calcification and poor opacification made 58%, 28% and 14% of the remaining 60 segments unevaluable respectively. Without routine administration of β-blockers, good coronary imaging quality can be acquired using 16-slice spiral CT. It is a reliable noninvasive method for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Keywords

tomography, X-ray computed / angiography / coronary artery / stenosis

References

[1] HoffmannM H K, ShiH, SchmidF T, et al.. Noninvasive coronary imaging with MDCT in comparison to invasive conventional coronary angiography: a fast-developing technology. AJR, 2004, 182: 601-608

[2] RopersD, BaumU, PohleK, et al.. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation, 2003, 107: 664-666

[3] ScanlonP J, FaxonD P, AudetA M, et al.. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the A-merican College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33: 1756-1824

[4] PannuH K, FlohrT G, CorlF M, et al.. Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. Radiographics, 2003, 23: 111-125

[5] NiemanK, CademartiriF, LemosP A, et al.. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation, 2002, 106: 2051-2054

[6] HoffmannM H K, ShiH, ManzkeR, et al.. Nonivasive Coronary Angiography with 16-Detector Row CT: Effect of Heart Rate. Radiology, 2005, 234: 86-97

[7] AchenbachS, GieslerT, RopersD, et al.. Detection of coronary artery stenosis by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation, 2001, 103: 2535-2538

[8] NiemanK, RensingB J, van GeunsR J, et al.. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 89: 913-918

[9] SchoenhagenP, HalliburtonS S, StillmanA E, et al.. Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology, 2004, 232: 7-17