Quantitative assessment of coronary flow reserve by the variables of time-intensity curve with myocardial contrast echocardiography

Abstract

The reliability and reliable indexes of quantitative assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by using time-intensity curve (TIC) via myocardial contrast echocardiography were investigated. The TIC variables were obtained by employing acoustic densitometry (AD) technique before and after acetylcholine (Ach) injection in 12 dogs. Meanwhile, the correlation between these variables and CFR was analyzed. Among the variables derived from TIC, peak intensity (PI), area under the curve (AUC) and descending slope (DS) were increased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase of coronary blood flow after Ach injection. Conversely, time-to-peak (TP), half-time of descent (HT), and mean-transit-time (MTT) were decreased remarkably (P<0.0001). The PI and AUC ratios from post-to pre-Ach injection were strongly associated with CFR with the correlation coefficient (r) being 0.8366 and 0.8824, respectively. It is reliable by using the variables derived from TIC with myocardial contrast echocardiography to quantitatively evaluate regional myocardial CFR. The PI and AUC ratios from post-to pre-Ach injection are the reliable indexes for quantitative assessment of CFR.

Keywords

time-intensity curve / ultrasound contrast / myocardium / variable / flow reserve

References

[1] PorterT R, AlwynD S A, TurnerC, et al.. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the assessment of coronary blood flow reserve: validation in human. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993, 21: 349-349

[2] KleinA L, BaileyA S, MouraA, et al.. Reliability of echocardiographic measurements of myocardial perfusion using commerially produced sonicated serum albumin (Albunex). J Am Coll Cardiol, 1993, 22: 1983-1983

[3] BaumgartD, HaudeM, LiuF Q, et al.. Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision marking during cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J, 1998, 136: 136-136

[4] KlockeF J. Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation, 1987, 76: 1183-1183

[5] KellerM W, SegalS S, KaulS, et al.. The behavior of sonication albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: A basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiogrophy. Circulation Research, 1989, 65: 458-458

[6] KaulS. Clinical application of myocardial contrast echocardiograply. Am J Cardiol, 1992, 69: 46H-46H

[7] JonathanR L, ChristionF, KevinW, et al.. Myocardial perfusion characteristic and hemodynamic profile of MRX-115, a venous echocardiographic contrast agent during acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1998, 11: 36-36

[8] KaulS. Quantification of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography. Am J Cardiac Imag, 1991, 5: 200-200

[9] ReviewK S. Assessment of myocardial perfusion with contrast two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Med Sci, 1990, 299(2): 113-113

[10] StraussA L, BellerK D. Contrast ultrasonography for 2-D opacification of heart cavities, peripheral vessels, kidney and muscle. Ultrasound Med & Biol, 1997, 23: 975-975

[11] IlicetoS, MarangelliV, MemmolaC, et al.. Trans-esophageal Doppler echocardiography evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity in baseline conditions and during dipyridamole-induced coronary vasodilation. Circulation, 1991, 83: 61-61

[12] CheirifJ, ZoghbiW A, RaiznerA E, et al.. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients by contrast echocardiography. I. Evaluation of regional coronary reserve by peak contrast intensity. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988, 11: 735-735

[13] KellerM W, GladaheenW, SmucherM L, et al.. Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans. II Assessment of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988, 12: 925-925