Comparision of MR-sequence in the diagnosis of anal fistula—The clinical value of 3D FLASH

Hu Daoyu , Wang Chengyuan , M. Langer

Current Medical Science ›› 2002, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3) : 241 -245.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2002, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3) : 241 -245. DOI: 10.1007/BF02828192
Article

Comparision of MR-sequence in the diagnosis of anal fistula—The clinical value of 3D FLASH

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To elevate the clinical value of3D-FLASH in the diagnosis of anal fistula and compare it with convationd MR sequence, MR sequences, consisting of spin echo T1WI, turbo invertion recovery magnitude (TIRM), fast low-angle shot image (FLASH), mon-enhancement and enhancement substraction and coronary reconstructing, was conducted in15 cases suspected of anal fistula. Comparison was made among the three sequences in display rate of internal fistula, external fistula, the branch of fistule connulas. Our results showed that1 patient had perianal abscess.24 different anal fistulas were identified in14 patients, and10 of them was complicated with perianal abscess and8 of them with complex multi-branch fistula. The display rate of3D-FLASH sequence was much higher than those of T1WI and TIRM in all cases. It is concluded that3D-FLASH squence is an senstive and time-efficient technique for the dignosis of anal fistula.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hu Daoyu, Wang Chengyuan, M. Langer. Comparision of MR-sequence in the diagnosis of anal fistula—The clinical value of 3D FLASH. Current Medical Science, 2002, 22(3): 241-245 DOI:10.1007/BF02828192

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

RamanujamP S, PrasadM L, AbcarianH, et al.. Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 1984, 27(9): 593-593

[2]

ScottH J, NorthoverJ M. Evaluation of surgery for perianal Crohn's fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 39(9): 1039-1039

[3]

RankinG B, WattsH D, MelnykC S, et al.. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study: extraintestinal manifestations and perianal complications. Gastroenterology, 1979, 77: 914-914

[4]

ParksA G, GordonP H, HardcastleJ D. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg, 1976, 63(1): 1-1

[5]

MorrisJ, SpencerJ A, AmbroseN S. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and ist implications for patient management. Radiographics, 2000, 20(3): 623-35

[6]

HalliganS, HealyJ C, BartramC I. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: STIR or SPIR?. Br J Radiol, 1998, 71(842): 141-141

[7]

BeckinghamI J, SpencerJ A, WardJ, et al.. Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg, 2002, 83(10): 1396-1396

[8]

NeuerburgJ, KloseK C, BohndorfK, et al.. MR tomography of colorectal diseases with a negative rectal contrast medium. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr, 1992, 156(3): 258-258

[9]

HalliganS, BartramC I. MR imaging of fistula in ano: are endoanal coils the gold standard?. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171(2): 407-407

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

92

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/