Long-term survival outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with camrelizumab plus apatinib in the phase II CLAP study

Abstract

Background: Camrelizumab plus apatinib have demonstrated robust antitumor activity and safety in patients with advanced cervical cancer (CLAP study; NCT03816553). We herein present the updated long-term results of the CLAP study and explore potential biomarkers for survival. The outcomes of patients who underwent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) retreatment were also reported.

Methods: In this phase II trial, eligible patients received camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every two weeks and apatinib 250 mg orally once daily in 4-week cycles for up to two years. Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Results: Between January 21 and August 1, 2019, a total of 45 patients were enrolled. Data were analyzed as of July 31, 2023, representing > 48 months since treatment initiation for all patients. Nine (20.0%) patients completed the 2-year study. The median duration of response (DOR) was 16.6 months, and 45.0% of patients achieved a DOR of ≥ 24 months. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 40.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2-55.6), with an 18-month PFS rate of 37.8% (95% CI, 22.7-52.8). The median overall survival (OS) was 20.3 months (95% CI, 9.3-36.9), and the 24-month OS rate was 47.8% (95% CI, 31.7-62.3). Age > 50 years, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 (versus [vs.] < 1), CPS ≥ 10 (vs. < 1), high tumor mutational burden, and PIK3CA mutations were associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] < 1) and longer OS (HR < 1). Eight patients who initially responded in the CLAP trial but later experienced disease progression were retreated with ICIs. Among them, 2 (25.0%) achieved a partial response, while 5 (62.5%) had stable disease. Notably, four patients who received retreatment with ICIs survived for more than 45 months. No new safety signals were identified in the present study.

Conclusion: Long-term survival follow-up data demonstrated that camrelizumab plus apatinib has robust, sustained, and durable efficacy in patients with advanced cervical cancer who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were noted with long-term treatment.

Keywords

Cemrelizumab / apatinib / programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) / programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) / tumor mutational burden (TMB) / PIK3CA / advanced cervical cancer

References

[1] Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(2):e197–e206.

[2] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.

[3] Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):584–590.

[4] Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long 3rd HJ, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):734–743.

[5] Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, Caceres MV, Hasegawa K, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(20):1856–1867.

[6] Frenel JS, Le Tourneau C, O'Neil B, Ott PA, Piha-Paul SA, Gomez-Roca C, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1-Positive Cervical Cancer: Results From the Phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(36):4035–4041.

[7] Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–1478.

[8] Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, Devlin MJ, Oaknin A, Kerger J, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vaginal, or Vulvar Carcinoma: Results From the Phase I/II CheckMate 358 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2825–2834.

[9] O'Malley DM, Oaknin A, Monk BJ, Selle F, Rojas C, Gladieff L, et al. Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-1 antibody balstilimab in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163(2):274–280.

[10] Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Vergote I, Miller A, de Melo AC, Kim HS, et al. Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):544–555.

[11] Lan C, Shen J, Wang Y, Li J, Liu Z, He M, et al. Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer (CLAP): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(34):4095–4106.

[12] Xu Q, Wang J, Sun Y, Lin Y, Liu J, Zhuo Y, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab Plus Anlotinib for PD-L1-Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Prospective Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16):1795–1805.

[13] Huang X, He M, Peng H, Tong C, Liu Z, Zhang X, et al. Genomic profiling of advanced cervical cancer to predict response to programmed death-1 inhibitor combination therapy: a secondary analysis of the CLAP trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(5).

[14] Xu Q, Chen CB, Sun Y, Huang ZZ, Lin YB, Liu J, et al. Overall survival results from a phase II trial of anlotinib plus sintilimab in patients with recurrent advanced cervical cancer. Abstract 5536. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16 suppl).

[15] Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, Stroyakovskiy D, Nogami N, et al. Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2288–2301.

[16] Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894–1905.

[17] Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1116–1127.

[18] Wu XH, Xia LF, Zhang K, Tang Y, Zhang GN, Wang D, et al. LBA44 Camrelizumab plus famitinib versus camrelizumab alone and investigator's choice of chemotherapy in women with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Annals of Oncol. 2023;34:S1284–S1285.

[19] Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–1813.

[20] Khagi Y, Kurzrock R, Patel SP. Next generation predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017;36(1):179–190.

[21] Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Ready N, Steins M, et al. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(35):3924–3933.

[22] Melosky B, Chu Q, Juergens RA, Leighl N, Ionescu D, Tsao MS, et al. Breaking the biomarker code: PD-L1 expression and checkpoint inhibition in advanced NSCLC. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;65:65–77.

[23] Sun C, Mezzadra R, Schumacher TN. Regulation and Function of the PD-L1 Checkpoint. Immunity. 2018;48(3):434–452.

[24] Blank CU, Haanen JB, Ribas A, Schumacher TN. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY. The “cancer immunogram”. Science. 2016;352(6286):658–660.

[25] Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, Muro K, Satoh T, Machado M, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Phase 2 Clinical KEYNOTE-059 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(5):e180013.

[26] Shitara K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Fuchs C, Wyrwicz L, Lee KW, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With First-line, Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KEYNOTE-062 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1571–1580.

[27] Wainberg ZA, Fuchs CS, Tabernero J, Shitara K, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, et al. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer with Programmed Death Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(7):1923–1931.

[28] Vokes NI, Liu D, Ricciuti B, Jimenez-Aguilar E, Rizvi H, Dietlein F, et al. Harmonization of Tumor Mutational Burden Quantification and Association With Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:PO.19.00171.

[29] Noskova H, Kyr M, Pal K, Merta T, Mudry P, Polaskova K, et al. Assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden in Pediatric Tumors by Real-Life Whole-Exome Sequencing and In Silico Simulation of Targeted Gene Panels: How the Choice of Method Could Affect the Clinical Decision? Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(1):230.

[30] Nusrat M, Roszik J, Katkhuda R, Menter D, Raghav KPS, Morris VK, et al. Association of PIK3CA mutations (mut) with immune engagement and clinical benefit from immunotherapy in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37(15_suppl):3604–3604.

[31] Ahn AR, Kim KM, Jang KY, Moon WS, Ha GW, Lee MR, et al. Correlation of PIK3CA mutation with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and their clinicopathological significance in colorectal cancer. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(18):1406.

[32] Gibney GT, Weiner LM, Atkins MB. Predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(12):e542–e551.

[33] Kugel CH, Douglass SM, Webster MR, Kaur A, Liu Q, Yin X, et al. Age Correlates with Response to Anti-PD1, Reflecting Age-Related Differences in Intratumoral Effector and Regulatory T-Cell Populations. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(21):5347–5356.

[34] Perier-Muzet M, Gatt E, Peron J, Falandry C, Amini-Adle M, Thomas L, et al. Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(1):82–87.

[35] Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Cho BC, Turna HZ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10183):1819–1830.

[36] Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(5):497–530.

[37] Robert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(9):1239–1251.

[38] Jansen YJL, Rozeman EA, Mason R, Goldinger SM, Geukes Foppen MH, Hoejberg L, et al. Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(7):1154–1161.

[39] Herbst RS, Garon EB, Kim DW, Cho BC, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Retreatment Among Patients With Previously Treated, Programmed Death-Ligand 1‒Positive, Advanced Non‒Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the KEYNOTE-010 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(14):1580–1590.

[40] Fujita K, Yamamoto Y, Kanai O, Okamura M, Hashimoto M, Nakatani K, et al. Retreatment with anti-PD-1 antibody in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with anti-PD-L1 antibody. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11(1):15–18.

[41] Garassino MC, Gelibter AJ, Grossi F, Chiari R, Soto Parra H, Cascinu S, et al. Italian Nivolumab Expanded Access Program in Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Results in Never-Smokers and EGFR-Mutant Patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(8):1146–1155.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.