Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2018, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 76-87     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20180108
Thematic practices |
Local Design Responding to Urban Problems— The Metro-Forest Project, Bangkok
Landscape Architects of Bangkok()
185/1 Sukhumvit 12, Khlong Toei, Khlong Toei, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
Download: PDF(33852 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

To respond to the urban problems and to increase forest areas in the city, an urban forest reflecting Bangkok’s former landscape was designed and constructed. To create diverse forest ecology and stimulate plant growth, Miyawaki’s ecological method to reforestation was implemented, and local tree species were used for pioneer planting as they had once established territorial populations around Bangkok. The layout of the species was carefully grouped, and planting locations were also carefully selected. The skywalk and observation tower were designed to minimize disturbance of the burgeoning forest and allow close-up views of the maturing canopy. This project is distinguished by strong design gestures that are well integrated into the landscape by using Bangkok’s design language, creating a space truly to inspire public awareness of urban forestry and the importance of environmental stewardship in Thailand.

Keywords Urban Forest      Local Tree Species      Succession of Tree Species      Canopy      Education     
Corresponding Authors: Landscape Architects of Bangkok   
Issue Date: 28 March 2018
 Cite this article:   
Landscape Architects of Bangkok. Local Design Responding to Urban Problems— The Metro-Forest Project, Bangkok[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(1): 76-87.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/10.15302/J-LAF-20180108
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2018/V6/I1/76
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Landscape Architects of Bangkok
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Dong ZHANG, Ziying TANG. A Natural Museum for Children: Cloud Paradise in Luxelakes Eco-City, Chengdu[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(6): 72-87.
[2] Jason HO. RE-EXAMINING THE RELATION SHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL AND Everyday Life through Mapping Workshop[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(5): 52-59.
[3] McGregor Coxall. BIRD AIRPORT— TIANJIN LINGANG BIRD SANCTUARY WETLAND PARK DESIGN[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(4): 80-95.
[4] Cameron Barradale. Age of the Tree[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(2): 72-85.
[5] Peter SIÖSTRÖM. City Sense(s) and Sustainable Urban Design[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2016, 4(4): 64-71.
[6] Yi LUO,Ming-Han LI. Building Sponge City: Examples of Landscape Architecture Curriculum on Stormwater Management in the UniteD States[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2016, 4(2): 62-77.
[7] Vo Trong Nghia Architects. A MODEL OF SUSTAINABLE EDUCATIONAL SPACE: FARMING KINDERGARTEN IN BIEN HOA , VIETNAM[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2016, 4(2): 118-127.
[8] . Sea Change: Boston Exhibition[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(3): 72-87.
[9] Jill HUBLEY. New York City Street Trees by Species[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(3): 88-93.
[10] Irina CHAKRABORTY,Puthea KHON,Taber HAND. The Urban Wetland Pissoir: A Functional Art for Raising Awareness of Infrastructure Challenges in Phnom Penh, Cambodia[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(2): 120-129.
[11] Leonardo ROBLETO COSTANTE. Future Hopley: Hutano, Mvura, Miti[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2015, 3(1): 92-103.
[12] . Isla Palenque Eco-tourism Master Plan, The Republic of Panama[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2014, 2(5): 80-91.
[13] . Report on “The Power of the Market” Forum[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2014, 2(2): 62-72.
[14] Matthew PRYOR, Dorothy TANG. Teaching Rationale: MLA Design Thesis at the University of Hong Kong[J]. Landsc Archit Front, 2013, 1(6): 102-111.
[15] Dihua LI. New Matters of Inclusiveness[J]. Landsc Archit Front, 2013, 1(5): 58-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed