Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (2) : 473-486     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0608-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Impacts of climate change on optimal mixture design of blended concrete considering carbonation and chloride ingress
Xiao-Yong WANG()
Department of Architectural Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si 24341, Korea
Download: PDF(1254 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Many studies on the mixture design of fly ash and slag ternary blended concrete have been conducted. However, these previous studies did not consider the effects of climate change, such as acceleration in the deterioration of durability, on mixture design. This study presents a procedure for the optimal mixture design of ternary blended concrete considering climate change and durability. First, the costs of CO2 emissions and material are calculated based on the concrete mixture and unit prices. Total cost is equal to the sum of material cost and CO2 emissions cost, and is set as the objective function of the optimization. Second, strength, slump, carbonation, and chloride ingress models are used to evaluate concrete properties. The effect of different climate change scenarios on carbonation and chloride ingress is considered. A genetic algorithm is used to find the optimal mixture considering various constraints. Third, illustrative examples are shown for mixture design of ternary blended concrete. The analysis results show that for ternary blended concrete exposed to an atmospheric environment, a rich mix is necessary to meet the challenge of climate change, and for ternary blended concrete exposed to a marine environment, the impact of climate change on mixture design is marginal.

Keywords ternary blended concrete      climate change      optimal mixture design      carbonation      chloride ingress     
Corresponding Authors: Xiao-Yong WANG   
Just Accepted Date: 05 March 2020   Online First Date: 08 April 2020    Issue Date: 08 May 2020
 Cite this article:   
Xiao-Yong WANG. Impacts of climate change on optimal mixture design of blended concrete considering carbonation and chloride ingress[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 473-486.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-020-0608-5
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2020/V14/I2/473
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xiao-Yong WANG
component cement fly ash slag water superplasticizer coarse aggregate fine aggregate
price 2.25 0.6 1.2 0.01 25.1 0.236 0.28
Tab.1  Unit prices of concrete components [14] (unit: NT dollar/kg)
component cement fly ash slag water superplasticizer coarse aggregate fine aggregate
CO2 emission 0.931 0.0196 0.0265 0.000196 0.25 0.0075 0.0026
Tab.2  Unit CO2 emissions of concrete components [7] (unit: kg)
limits of component item cement fly ash slag water superplasticizer coarse aggregate fine aggregate
lower limit (kg/m3) lower limit (kg) 140 ??0 ??0 150 ?3 ?780 640
upper limit (kg/m3) upper limit (kg) 350 200 240 250 15 1050 900
Tab.3  Lower and upper limits of concrete components (unit: kg/m3)
limits of component ratio water-to-cement ratio water-to-binder ratio water-to-solid ratio superplasticizer-to-binder ratio fly ash-to-binder ratio slag-to-binder ratio mineral mixtures-to-binder ratio aggregate-to-binder ratio sand ratio
lower limit 0.6 0.3 0.08 0.013 0.00 0.0 0.25 2.7 0.40
upper limit 1.6 0.7 0.12 0.040 0.55 0.6 0.70 6.4 0.52
Tab.4  Component ratio constraints
Fig.1  Evaluations of concrete strength and slump: (a) compressive strength; (b) slump.
Fig.2  parameter analysis of effects of mineral admixtures on durability. (a) Carbonation-W/B0.5-30% mineral admixtures; (b) carbonation-W/B0.5-50% mineral admixtures; (c) carbonation-W/B0.4-50% mineral admixtures; (d) chloride ingress-W/B0.5-30% mineral admixtures; (e) chloride ingress-W/B0.5-50% mineral admixtures; (f) chloride ingress-W/B0.4-50% mineral admixtures.
Fig.3  Flowchart of calculation.
Fig.4  Climate change scenarios. (a) CO2 concentration rise; (b) global temperature rise.
mixtures cement fly ash slag water superplasticizer coarse aggregate fine aggregate
Mix 1: ignoring carbonation 140.00 117.13 ?95.87 168.56 4.59 1050.00? 700.60
Mix 2: carbonation-no climate change 140.00 200.00 113.37 167.35 5.89 983.08 655.39
Mix 3: carbonation-RCP 4.5 142.55 200.00 132.61 167.45 6.18 970.81 647.21
Mix 4: carbonation-RCP 8.5 144.69 200.00 137.60 167.50 6.27 966.86 644.57
Mix 5: chloride ingress 140.00 ?84.63 122.26 168.89 4.51 1050.00? 714.22
Tab.5  Concrete mixtures (unit: kg/m3)
mixtures slump (cm) strength (MPa) carbonation depth (mm) CO2 cost (NT dollar/m3) material cost (NT dollar/m3) total cost (NT dollar/m3)
Mix 1: ignoring carbonation 6.50 30.00 33.40 70.35 1061.16 1131.51
Mix 2: carbonation-no climate change 12.71 36.14 25.00 71.22 1136.17 1207.39
Mix 3: carbonation-RCP 4.5 14.01 38.73 25.00 72.58 1166.92 1239.51
Mix 4: carbonation-RCP 8.5 14.35 39.56 25.00 73.60 1178.37 1251.97
Mix 5: chloride ingress 6.50 32.00 70.39 1075.15 1145.54
Tab.6  Performance of concrete
Fig.5  Carbonation depth of Mix 1.
mixtures water-to-cement ratio water-to-binder ratio water-to-solid ratio superplasticizer-to-binder ratio fly ash-to-binder ratio slag-to-binder ratio mineral mixtures-to-binder ratio aggregate-to-binder ratio sand ratio total
volume
(including air)
Mix 1 1.204 0.478 0.080 0.013 0.332 0.272 0.603 4.959 0.400 1.000
Mix 2 1.195 0.369 0.080 0.013 0.441 0.250 0.691 3.614 0.400 1.000
Mix 3 1.175 0.352 0.080 0.013 0.421 0.279 0.700 3.405 0.400 1.000
Mix 4 1.158 0.347 0.080 0.013 0.415 0.285 0.700 3.341 0.400 1.000
Mix 5 1.206 0.487 0.080 0.013 0.244 0.352 0.596 5.086 0.405 1.000
Tab.7  Mass ratio of concrete components
Fig.6  Carbonation depth of Mix 2 for various climate change scenarios. (a) Mix 2-no climate change; (b) Mix 2-RCP 4.5; (c) Mix 2-RCP 8.5.
Fig.7  Carbonation depth of Mix 3 for RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. (a) Mix 3-RCP 4.5; (b) Mix 3-RCP 8.5.
Fig.8  Carbonation depth of Mix 4 for RCP 8.5.
Fig.9  Carbonation depth of Mix 4 for RCP 8.5.
Fig.10  Chloride ingress of Mix5 for various climate change scenarios. (a) Mix5-no climate change; (b) Mix5-RCP 4.5; (c) Mix5-RCP 8.5.
Fig.11  CO2 cost, material cost, and total cost of concrete. (a) CO2 cost; (b) material cost; (c) total cost.
1 I S Yoon, O Çopuroğlu, K B Park. Effect of global climatic change on carbonation progress of concrete. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(34): 7274–7285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.028
2 B H Oh, S Y Jang. Prediction of diffusivity of concrete based on simple analytic equations. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(3): 463–480
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.026
3 K Celik, C Meral, A Petek Gursel, P K Mehta, A Horvath, P J M Monteiro. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended Portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 56: 59–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.003
4 S H Tae, C H Baek, S W Shin. Life cycle CO2 evaluation on reinforced concrete structures with high-strength concrete. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2011, 31(3): 253–260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.07.002
5 F Rivera, P Martínez, J Castro, M Lopez. Massive volume fly-ash concrete: A more sustainable material with fly ash replacing cement and aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 63: 104–112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.08.001
6 M W Tait, W M Cheung. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21(6): 847–860
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1045-5
7 K H Yang, K H Lee, J K Song, M H Gong. Properties and sustainability of alkali-activated slag foamed concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 68: 226–233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.068
8 J J Wang, Y F Wang, Y W Sun, D D Tingley, Y R Zhang. Life cycle sustainability assessment of fly ash concrete structures. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 80: 1162–1174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.232
9 B Y Lee, J H Kim, J K Kim. Optimum concrete mixture proportion based on a database considering regional characteristics. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2009, 23(5): 258–265
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:5(258)
10 J H Lee, Y S Yoon. Modified harmony search algorithm and neural networks for concrete mix proportion design. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2009, 23(1): 57–61
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2009)23:1(57)
11 T H Kim, S H Tae, S J Suk, G Ford, K H Yang. An optimization system for concrete life cycle cost and related CO2 emissions. Sustainability, 2016, 8(4): 361–379
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040361
12 H Sebaaly, S Varma, J W Maina. Optimizing asphalt mix design process using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 168: 660–670
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.118
13 J D Tapali, S Demis, V G Papadakis. Sustainable concrete mix design for a target strength and service life. Computers and Concrete, 2013, 12(6): 755–774
https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2013.12.6.755
14 I C Yeh. Computer-aided design for optimum concrete mixtures. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2007, 29(3): 193–202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.001
15 H S Park, B K Kwon, Y A Shin, Y S Kim, T H Hong, S W Choi. Cost and CO2 emission optimization of steel reinforced concrete columns in high-rise buildings. Energies, 2013, 6(11): 5609–5624
https://doi.org/10.3390/en6115609
16 V G Papadakis. Effect of supplementary cementing materials on concrete resistance against carbonation and chloride ingress. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(2): 291–299
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00249-5
17 V G Papadakis, S Tsimas. Supplementary cementing materials in concrete Part I: Efficiency and design. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(10): 1525–1532
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00827-X
18 M D A Thomas, E C Bentz. Life-365TM Service Life Prediction Model. Version 2.2.1. Toronto: Life-365 Consortium, 2014
19 S J Kwon, U J Na, S S Park, S H Jung. Service life prediction of concrete wharves with early-aged crack: Probabilistic approach for chloride diffusion. Structural Safety, 2009, 31(1): 75–83
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.03.004
20
21 M Gheibi, M Karrabi, M Shakerian, M Mirahmadi. Life cycle assessment of concrete production with a focus on air pollutants and the desired risk parameters using genetic algorithm. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 2018, 16(1): 89–98
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-018-0302-x
22 European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. London: British Standards Institution, 2006
23 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. IPCC: Geneva, 2014
24 B Abdelkader, K El-Hadj, E Karim. Efficiency of granulated blast furnace slag replacement of cement according to the equivalent binder concept. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(3): 226–231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.004
25 V Chandwani, V Agrawal, R Nagar. Modeling slump of ready mix concrete using genetic algorithms assisted training of Artificial Neural Networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(2): 885–893
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.048
26 O Belalia Douma, B Boukhatem, M Ghrici, A Tagnit-Hamou. Prediction of properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network. Neural Computing & Applications, 2017, 28(S1): 707–718
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2368-7
27 S Demis, M P Efstathiou, V G Papadakis. Computer-aided modeling of concrete service life. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 47: 9–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.11.004
28 R Bucher, P Diederich, G Escadeillas, M Cyr. Service life of metakaolin-based concrete exposed to carbonation: Comparison with blended cement containing fly ash, blast furnace slag and limestone filler. Cement and Concrete Research, 2017, 99: 18–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.04.013
29 M G Stewart, X M Wang, M N Nguyen. Climate change impact and risks of concrete infrastructure deterioration. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(4): 1326–1337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.010
30 Y Z Wang, L J Wu, Y C Wang, Q M Li, Z Xiao. Prediction model of long-term chloride diffusion into plain concrete considering the effect of the heterogeneity of materials exposed to marine tidal zone. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 159: 297–315
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.083
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Peng ZHU, Ji ZHANG, Wenjun QU. Long-term effects of electrochemical realkalization on carbonated concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 127-137.
[2] Sanjeev Kumar VERMA,Sudhir Singh BHADAURIA,Saleem AKHTAR. In-situ condition monitoring of reinforced concrete structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 420-437.
[3] Seyedhamed SADATI,Mehdi K. MORADLLO,Mohammad SHEKARCHI. Long-term durability of onshore coated concrete —chloride ion and carbonation effects[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 150-161.
[4] S. MUTHULINGAM,B. N. RAO. Chloride binding and time-dependent surface chloride content models for fly ash concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 112-120.
[5] Chaolin GU, Sunsheng HAN. Climate change and China’s mega urban regions[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2010, 4(4): 418-430.
[6] CHEN Shudong, SUN Wei, ZHANG Yunsheng, GUO Fei. Carbonation depth prediction of fly ash concrete subjected to 2- and 3-dimensional CO attack[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2008, 2(4): 395-400.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed