Potential of performance improvement of concentrated solar power plants by optimizing the parabolic trough receiver

Abstract

This paper proposes a comprehensive thermodynamic and economic model to predict and compare the performance of concentrated solar power plants with traditional and novel receivers with different configurations involving operating temperatures and locations. The simulation results reveal that power plants with novel receivers exhibit a superior thermodynamic and economic performance compared with traditional receivers. The annual electricity productions of power plants with novel receivers in Phoenix, Sevilla, and Tuotuohe are 8.5%, 10.5%, and 14.4% higher than those with traditional receivers at the outlet temperature of 550°C. The levelized cost of electricity of power plants with double-selective-coated receivers can be decreased by 6.9%, 8.5%, and 11.6%. In Phoenix, the optimal operating temperature of the power plants is improved from 500°C to 560°C by employing a novel receiver. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of the receiver heat loss, solar absorption, and freeze protection temperature is also conducted to analyze the general rule of influence of the receiver performance on power plants performance. Solar absorption has a positive contribution to annual electricity productions, whereas heat loss and freeze protection temperature have a negative effect on electricity outputs. The results indicate that the novel receiver coupled with low melting temperature molten salt is the best configuration for improving the overall performance of the power plants.

Keywords

concentrated solar power / parabolic trough receiver / heat loss / solar energy / annual performance

References

[1] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C. Alternative designs of parabolic trough solar collectors. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 71: 81–117

[2] Xuan Q, Li G, Lu Y, Zhao B, Zhao X, Su Y, Ji J, Pei G. Overall detail comparison for a building integrated concentrating photovoltaic/daylighting system. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 199: 415–426

[3] AlZahrani A A, Dincer I. Energy and exergy analyses of a parabolic trough solar power plant using carbon dioxide power cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 158: 476–488

[4] Wang F, Cheng Z, Tan J, Yuan Y, Shuai Y, Liu L. Progress in concentrated solar power technology with parabolic trough collector system: a comprehensive review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 79: 1314–1328

[5] Kannan N, Vakeesan D. Solar energy for future world: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 62: 1092–1105

[6] Olson K D, Talghader J J. Solar selective coating optimization for direct steam generation parabolic trough designs. Solar Energy, 2016, 124: 82–88

[7] Lei D, Wang Z, Li J, Li J, Wang Z. Experimental study of glass to metal seals for parabolic trough receivers. Renewable Energy, 2012, 48: 85–91

[8] Burlafinger K, Vetter A, Brabec C J. Maximizing concentrated solar power (CSP) plant overall efficiencies by using spectral selective absorbers at optimal operation temperatures. Solar Energy, 2015, 120: 428–438

[9] Maccari A, Bissi D, Casubolo G, Guerrini F, Lucatello L, Luna G, Rivaben A, Savoldi E, Tamano S, Zuanella M. Archimede solar energy molten salt parabolic trough demo plant: a step ahead towards the new frontiers of CSP. Energy Procedia, 2015, 69: 1643–1651

[10] Kearney D, Herrmann U, Nava P, Kelly B. Assessment of a molten salt heat transfer fluid in a parabolic trough solar field. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2002, 125: 293–299

[11] Llorente García I, Álvarez J L, Blanco D. Performance model for parabolic trough solar thermal power plants with thermal storage: comparison to operating plant data. Solar Energy, 2011, 85(10): 2443–2460

[12] Patnode A M. Simulation and performance evaluation of parabolic trough solar power plants. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2006

[13] Esposito S, D’Angelo A, Antonaia A, Castaldo A, Ferrara M, Addonizio M L, Guglielmo A. Optimization procedure and fabrication of highly efficient and thermally stable solar coating for receiver operating at high temperature. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2016, 157: 429–437

[14] Wang Q, Li J, Yang H, Su K, Hu M, Pei G. Performance analysis on a high-temperature solar evacuated receiver with an inner radiation shield. Energy, 2017, 139: 447–458

[15] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Antonopoulos K A, Gkinis G. Thermal enhancement of solar parabolic trough collectors by using nanofluids and converging-diverging absorber tube. Renewable Energy, 2016, 94: 213–222

[16] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C. Investigation of a star flow insert in a parabolic trough solar collector. Applied Energy, 2018, 224: 86–102

[17] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C. A review of concentrating solar thermal collectors with and without nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019, 135(1): 763–786

[18] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Tsimpoukis D. Enhancing the performance of parabolic trough collectors using nanofluids and turbulators. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 91: 358–375

[19] Yuasa M, Hino K. Molten salt parabolic trough system with synthetic oil preheating. In: AIP Conference Proceeding. Maryland: AIP Publishing LLC, 2017, 020018

[20] Cheng Z D, He Y L, Xiao J, Tao Y B, Xu R J. Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics in the receiver tube of parabolic trough solar collector. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 37(7): 782–787

[21] Daly J C. Solar concentrator flux distributions using backward ray tracing. Applied Optics, 1979, 18(15): 2696–2699

[22] Grena R. Optical simulation of a parabolic solar trough collector. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2010, 29(1): 19–36

[23] Cao F, McEnaney K, Chen G, Ren Z. A review of cermet-based spectrally selective solar absorbers. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(5): 1615–1627

[24] Yang H, Wang Q, Huang X, Li J, Pei G. Performance study and comparative analysis of traditional and double-selective-coated parabolic trough receivers. Energy, 2018, 145: 206–216

[25] Thermoflow STEAMPRO 19.0 simulation software. Jacksonville: Thermoflow Inc, 2017

[26] Forristall R. Heat transfer analysis and modeling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in engineering equation solver. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA, 2003

[27] Yang H, Wang Q, Huang Y, Gao G, Feng J, Li J, Pei G. Novel parabolic trough power system integrating direct steam generation and molten salt systems: preliminary thermodynamic study. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 909–926

[28] Padilla R V, Demirkaya G, Goswami D Y, Stefanakos E, Rahman M M. Heat transfer analysis of parabolic trough solar receiver. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(12): 5097–5110

[29] System Advisor Model (SAM). Version 2019. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019

[30] Bergman T L, Lavine A S, Incropera F P, DeWittk D P. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011

[31] Liu Q, Bai Z, Sun J, Yan Y, Gao Z, Jin H. Thermodynamics investigation of a solar power system integrated oil and molten salt as heat transfer fluids. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 93: 967–977

[32] Energy Plus energy simulation software: weather data. 2020–04–05, available at website of Energyplus

[33] Kearney D, Kelly B, Herrmann U, Cable R, Pacheco J, Mahoney R, Price H, Blake D, Nava P, Potrovitza N. Engineering aspects of a molten salt heat transfer fluid in a trough solar field. Energy, 2004, 29(5–6): 861–870

[34] Kearney D, Herrmann U, Nava P, Kelly B, Mahoney R, Pacheco J, Cable R, Potrovitza N, Blake D, Price H. Evaluation of a molten salt heat transfer fluid in a parabolic trough solar field. In: ASME Solar 2002: International Solar Energy Conference. Reno: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 2002, 293–299

[35] Montes M J, Abánades A, Martínez-Val J M, Valdés M. Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(12): 2165–2176

[36] Wu Z, Li S, Yuan G, Lei D, Wang Z. Three-dimensional numerical study of heat transfer characteristics of parabolic trough receiver. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 902–911

[37] Wu Y T, Li Y, Ren N, Zhi R P, Ma C F. Experimental study on the thermal stability of a new molten salt with low melting point for thermal energy storage applications. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2018, 176: 181–189

[38] Nunes V M B, Queirós C S, Lourenço M J V, Santos F J V, Nieto de Castro C A. Molten salts as engineering fluids—a review. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 603–611

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51776193 and 5171101721), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. WK6030000133).

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn