Comprehensive comparison of small-scale natural gas liquefaction processes using brazed plate heat exchangers

Jitan WU, Yonglin JU

PDF(1433 KB)
PDF(1433 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4) : 683-698. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-020-0705-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comprehensive comparison of small-scale natural gas liquefaction processes using brazed plate heat exchangers

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The brazed plate heat exchanger (BPHE) has some advantages over the plate-fin heat exchanger (PFHE) when used in natural gas liquefaction processes, such as the convenient installation and transportation, as well as the high tolerance of carbon dioxide (CO2) impurities. However, the BPHEs with only two channels cannot be applied directly in the conventional liquefaction processes which are designed for multi-stream heat exchangers. Therefore, the liquefaction processes using BPHEs are different from the conventional PFHE processes. In this paper, four different liquefaction processes using BPHEs are optimized and comprehensively compared under respective optimal conditions. The processes are compared with respect to energy consumption, economic performance, and robustness. The genetic algorithm (GA) is applied as the optimization method and the total revenue requirement (TRR) method is adopted in the economic analysis. The results show that the modified single mixed refrigerant (MSMR) process with part of the refrigerant flowing back to the compressor at low temperatures has the lowest specific energy consumption but the worst robustness of the four processes. The MSMR with fully utilization of cold capacity of the refrigerant shows a satisfying robustness and the best economic performance. The research in this paper is helpful for the application of BPHEs in natural gas liquefaction processes.

Keywords

liquefied natural gas / brazed plate heat exchanger / energy consumption / economic performance / robustness

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jitan WU, Yonglin JU. Comprehensive comparison of small-scale natural gas liquefaction processes using brazed plate heat exchangers. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(4): 683‒698 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0705-0

References

[1]
He T, Karimi I A, Ju Y. Review on the design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction processes for onshore and offshore applications. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 132: 89–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
He T, Chong Z R, Zheng J, Ju Y, Linga P. LNG cold energy utilization: prospects and challenges. Energy, 2019, 170: 557–568
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Kim D, Hwang C, Gundersen T, Lim Y. Process design and economic optimization of boil-off-gas re-liquefaction systems for LNG carriers. Energy, 2019, 173: 1119–1129
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Waldrup S P. 2018 Outlook for energy: a view to 2040. ExxonMobil, 2018
[5]
Nguyen T V, Rothuizen E D, Markussen W B, Elmegaard B. Thermodynamic comparison of three small-scale gas liquefaction systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 712–724
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Khan M S, Lee M. Design optimization of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the particle swarm paradigm with nonlinear constraints. Energy, 2013, 49: 146–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
He T B, Liu Z M, Ju Y L, Parvez A M. A comprehensive optimization and comparison of modified single mixed refrigerant and parallel nitrogen expansion liquefaction process for small-scale mobile LNG plant. Energy, 2019, 167: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Mehrpooya M, Ansarinasab H. Exergoeconomic evaluation of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 99: 400–413
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Qyyum M A, Ali W, Long N V D, Khan M S, Lee M. Energy efficiency enhancement of a single mixed refrigerant LNG process using a novel hydraulic turbine. Energy, 2018, 144: 968–976
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Tan H B, Shan S Y, Nie Y, Zhao Q X. A new boil-off gas re-liquefaction system for LNG carriers based on dual mixed refrigerant cycle. Cryogenics, 2018, 92: 84–92
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cao L, Liu J P, Xu X W. Robustness analysis of the mixed refrigerant composition employed in the single mixed refrigerant (SMR) liquefied natural gas (LNG) process. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 93: 1155–1163
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hwang J H, Ku N K, Roh M I, Lee K Y. Optimal design of liquefaction cycles of liquefied natural gas floating, production, storage, and offloading unit considering optimal synthesis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(15): 5341–5356
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hwang J H, Roh M I, Lee K Y. Determination of the optimal operating conditions of the dual mixed refrigerant cycle for the LNG FPSO topside liquefaction process. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2013, 49: 25–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Xiong X, Lin W, Gu A. Design and optimization of offshore natural gas liquefaction processes adopting PLNG (pressurized liquefied natural gas) technology. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 30: 379–387
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
de Mello P E B, Villanueva H H S, Scuotto S, Donato G H B, Ortega F D. Heat transfer, pressure drop and structural analysis of a finned plate ceramic heat exchanger. Energy, 2017, 120: 597–607
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Wang Z, Li Y Z. A combined method for surface selection and layer pattern optimization of a multistream plate-fin heat exchanger. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 815–827
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Ma H, Hou C, Yang R, Li C, Ma B, Ren J, Liu Y. The influence of structure parameters on stress of plate-fin structures in LNG heat exchanger. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 34: 85–99
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Zhan Y, Wang J, Wang W, Wang R S. Dynamic simulation of a single nitrogen expansion cycle for natural gas liquefaction under refrigerant inventory operation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 747–761
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Sun H, Hu H, Ding G, Chen H, Zhang Z, Wu C, Wang L. A general distributed-parameter model for thermal performance of cold box with parallel plate-fin heat exchangers based on graph theory. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 148: 478–490
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Berstad D, Nekså P, Anantharaman R. Low-temperature CO2 removal from natural gas. Energy Procedia, 2012, 26: 41–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wu J T, He T B, Ju Y L. Experimental study on CO2 frosting and clogging in a brazed plate heat exchanger for natural gas liquefaction process. Cryogenics, 2018, 91: 128–135
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Wu J T, Ju Y L. Design and optimization of natural gas liquefaction process using brazed plate heat exchangers based on the modified single mixed refrigerant process. Energy, 2019, 186: 115819
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Aslambakhsh A H, Moosavian M A, Amidpour M, Hosseini M, AmirAfshar S. Global cost optimization of a mini-scale liquefied natural gas plant. Energy, 2018, 148: 1191–1200
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Lee W, An J, Lee J M, Lim Y. Design of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process considering load variation. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 139: 89–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Watson H A J, Vikse M, Gundersen T, Barton P I. Optimization of single mixed-refrigerant natural gas liquefaction processes described by nondifferentiable models. Energy, 2018, 150: 860–876
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
He T B, Ju Y L. Design and optimization of a novel mixed refrigerant cycle integrated with NGL recovery process for small-scale LNG plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(13): 5545–5553
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Pham T N, Khan M S, Minh L Q, Husmil Y A, Bahadori A, Lee S, Lee M. Optimization of modified single mixed refrigerant process of natural gas liquefaction using multivariate Coggin’s algorithm combined with process knowledge. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33: 731–741
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Nekså P, Brendeng E, Drescher M, Norberg B. Development and analysis of a natural gas reliquefaction plant for small gas carriers. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2010, 2(2–3): 143–149
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Holland J H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: an Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992
[30]
Technical Assessment Guide (TAGTM). TR-100281 Revision 6 Palo Alto Electric Power Research Institute. CA (Edinburgh), 1993
[31]
Bejan A TG, Moran M. Thermal Design and Optimization. New York: Wiley, 1996
[32]
Ghorbani B, Mehrpooya M, Hamedi M H, Amidpour M. Exergoeconomic analysis of integrated natural gas liquids (NGL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) processes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 113: 1483–1495
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
CouperJ R, Penney W R, Fair J R. Chemical Process Equipment: Selection and Design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010
[34]
Towler Gavin R K S. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. London: Elsevier, 2012
[35]
Khan T S, Khan M S, Chyu M C, Ayub Z H. Experimental investigation of single phase convective heat transfer coefficient in a corrugated plate heat exchanger for multiple plate configurations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(8–9): 1058–1065
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Khan T S, Khan M S, Chyu M C, Ayub Z H. Experimental investigation of evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop of ammonia in a 60° Chevron plate heat exchanger. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2012, 35(2): 336–348
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1433 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/