Please wait a minute...

Frontiers in Energy

Front. Energy    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (3) : 443-451     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0683-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Efficient promotion of methane hydrate formation and elimination of foam generation using fluorinated surfactants
Quan CAO1(), Dongyan XU2, Huanfei XU3, Shengjun LUO1(), Rongbo GUO4()
1. Shandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China
2. Faculty of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
3. Faculty of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China; College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
4. Shandong Industrial Engineering Laboratory of Biogas Production and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biofuels of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China; Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian 116023, China; Faculty of Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
Download: PDF(1096 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Methane hydrate preparation is an effective method to store and transport methane. In promoters to facilitate methane hydrate formation, homogeneous surfactant solutions, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in particular, are more favorable than heterogeneous particles, thanks to their faster reaction rate, more storage capacity, and higher stability. Foaming, however, could not be avoided during hydrate dissociation with the presence of SDS. This paper investigated the ability of five fluorinated surfactants: potassium perfluorobutane sulfonate (PBS), potassium perfluorohexyl sulfonate (PHS), potassium perfluorooctane sulfonate (POS), ammonium perfluorooctane sulfonate (AOS), and tetraethylammonium perfluorooctyl sulfonate (TOS) to promote methane hydrate formation. It was found that both PBS and PHS achieve a storage capacity of 150 (V/V, the volume of methane that can be stored by one volume of water) within 30 min, more than that of SDS. Cationic ions and the carbon chain length were then discussed on their effects during the formation. It was concluded that PBS, PHS, and POS produced no foam during hydrate dissociation, making them promising promoters in large-scale application.

Keywords methane hydrate      fluorinated surfactants      homogeneous promoter      foam elimination      stability     
Corresponding Author(s): Quan CAO,Shengjun LUO,Rongbo GUO   
Online First Date: 13 July 2020    Issue Date: 14 September 2020
 Cite this article:   
Quan CAO,Dongyan XU,Huanfei XU, et al. Efficient promotion of methane hydrate formation and elimination of foam generation using fluorinated surfactants[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(3): 443-451.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-020-0683-2
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2020/V14/I3/443
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Quan CAO
Dongyan XU
Huanfei XU
Shengjun LUO
Rongbo GUO
Fig.1  Scheme 1 Graphical representation of hydrate formation apparatus.
Fig.2  Surface tension of fluorinated surfactants at 20°C.
Fig.3  Contact angles of fluorinated surfactant solutions at 20°C.
Fig.4  Methane consumption versus time for fluorinated surfactants at 300 r/min, a temperature of 2°C, and a pressure of 6 MPa.
Fig.5  Effects of salts added on hydration formation at 300 r/min, a temperature of 2°C, and a pressure of 6 MPa.
Surfactant Concentration/(m·mol·L1) Viscosity/(mPa·S)
PBS 40 2.9
PHS 10 3.1
POS 4 2.8
AOS 1 3.4
AOS 4 6.7
AOS 7 8.2
TOS 1 3.6
TOS 4 7.1
TOS 7 8.7
Tab.1  Viscosities of surfactant solutions at 20°C
Fig.6  Photographs of hydrate dissociation.
Fig.7  Photographs taken five minutes after violently shaking the surfactant solutions (from left to right: PBS 30 mmol/L; PHS 10 mmol/L; SDS 1 mmol/L; SDS 4 mmol/L).
Fig.8  Hydrate formation at 300 r/min, different temperatures, and pressures.
Fig.9  Reactions with PHS (10 mmol/L) without stirring and its recycling at a temperature of 2°C and a pressure of 6 MPa.
1 M J Yang, J N Zheng, Y Gao, Z Ma, X Lv, Y Song. Dissociation characteristics of methane hydrates in South China Sea sediments by depressurization. Applied Energy, 2019, 243: 266–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.160
2 J Zhang, C Yip, C Xia, Y Liang. Evaluation of methane release from coals from the San Juan basin and Powder River basin. Fuel, 2019, 244: 388–394
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.020
3 R Rathi, M Lavania, N Singh, P M Sarma, P Kishore, P Hajra, B Lal. Evaluating indigenous diversity and its potential for microbial methane generation from thermogenic coal bed methane reservoir. Fuel, 2019, 250: 362–372
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.125
4 A Wang, D Austin, H Song. Investigations of thermochemical upgrading of biomass and its model compounds: opportunities for methane utilization. Fuel, 2019, 246: 443–453
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.015
5 H Guo, Y Cheng, Z Huang, M A Urynowicz, W Liang, Z Han, J Liu. Factors affecting co-degradation of coal and straw to enhance biogenic coalbed methane. Fuel, 2019, 244: 240–246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.011
6 C Lay, T Vo, P Y Lin, P M Abdul, C M Liu, C Y Lin. Anaerobic hydrogen and methane production from low-strength beverage wastewater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(28): 14351–14361
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.165
7 E Andres-Garcia, A Dikhtiarenko, F Fauth, J Silvestre-Albero, E V Ramos-Fernández, J Gascon, A Corma, F Kapteijn. Methane hydrates: nucleation in microporous materials. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 360: 569–576
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.216
8 B C Gbaruko, J C Igwe, P N Gbaruko, R C Nwokeoma. Gas hydrates and clathrates: flow assurance, environmental and economic perspectives and the Nigerian liquified natural gas project. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2007, 56(1–3): 192–198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.12.011
9 R Ohmura, S Takeya, T Uchida, T Ebinuma. Clathrate hydrate formed with methane and 2-propanol: confirmation of structure II hydrate formation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(16): 4964–4966
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0498089
10 Y Jin, M Kida, Y Konno, J Nagao. Clathrate hydrate equilibrium in methane-water systems with the addition of monosaccharide and sugar alcohol. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2017, 62(1): 440–444
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.6b00756
11 K Imasato, H Tokutomi, R Ohmura. Crystal growth behavior of methane hydrate in the presence of liquid hydrocarbon. Crystal Growth & Design, 2015, 15(1): 428–433
https://doi.org/10.1021/cg501500w
12 R Susilo, S Alavi, J Ripmeester, P Englezos. Tuning methane content in gas hydrates via thermodynamic modeling and molecular dynamics simulation. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2008, 263(1): 6–17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2007.09.015
13 H Mimachi, M Takahashi, S Takeya, Y Gotoh, A Yoneyama, K Hyodo, T Takeda, T Murayama. Effect of long-term storage and thermal history on the gas content of natural gas hydrate pellets under ambient pressure. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(8): 4827–4834
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00832
14 S Takeya, A Yoneyama, K Ueda, K Hyodo, T Takeda, H Mimachi, M Takahashi, T Iwasaki, K Sano, H Yamawaki, Y Gotoh. Nondestructive imaging of anomalously preserved methane clathrate hydrate by phase contrast X-ray imaging. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(32): 16193–16199
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202569r
15 P Gupta, S Sakthivel, J S Sangwai. Effect of aromatic/aliphatic based ionic liquids on the phase behavior of methane hydrates: experiments and modeling. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2018, 117: 9–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2017.08.037
16 S Jadav, N Sakthipriya, M Doble, J S Sangwai. Effect of biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the formation kinetics of methane hydrates. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 43: 156–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.03.032
17 H Ganji, M Manteghian, K Sadaghiani Zadeh, M R Omidkhah, H Rahimi Mofrad. Effect of different surfactants on methane hydrate formation rate, stability and storage capacity. Fuel, 2007, 86(3): 434–441
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.032
18 A Erfani, E Fallahjokandan, F Varaminian. Effects of non-ionic surfactants on formation kinetics of structure H hydrate regarding transportation and storage of natural gas. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 37: 397–408
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.058
19 J Verrett, P Servio. Evaluating surfactants and their effect on methane mole fraction during hydrate growth. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(40): 13144–13149
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301931m
20 M Aliabadi, A Rasoolzadeh, F Esmaeilzadeh, A M Alamdari. Experimental study of using CuO nanoparticles as a methane hydrate promoter. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27: 1518–1522
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.10.017
21 N Choudhary, V R Hande, S Roy, S Chakrabarty, R Kumar. Effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant on methane hydrate formation: a molecular dynamics study. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2018, 122(25): 6536–6542
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b02285
22 A Siangsai, K Inkong, S Kulprathipanja, B Kitiyanan, P Rangsunvigit. Roles of sodium dodecyl sulfate on tetrahydrofuran-assisted methane hydrate formation. Journal of Oleo Science, 2018, 67(6): 707–717
https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess17275
23 K Watanabe, S Niwa, Y H Mori. Surface tensions of aqueous solutions of sodium alkyl sulfates in contact with methane under hydrate-forming conditions. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2005, 50(5): 1672–1676
https://doi.org/10.1021/je050139v
24 G Bhattacharjee, V Barmecha, O S Kushwaha, R Kumar. Kinetic promotion of methane hydrate formation by combining anionic and silicone surfactants: scalability promise of methane storage due to prevention of foam formation. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2018, 117: 248–255
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2017.09.029
25 G Pandey, G Bhattacharjee, H P Veluswamy, R Kumar, J S Sangwai, P Linga. Alleviation of foam formation in a surfactant driven gas hydrate system: insights via a detailed morphological study. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018, 1: 6899–6911
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01307
26 Y Song, F Wang, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Amphiphilic-polymer-coated carbon nanotubes as promoters for methane hydrate formation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(10): 9271–9278
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02239
27 F Wang, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Grafting of nano-Ag particles on −SO3−-coated nanopolymers for promoting methane hydrate formation. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2017, 5(35): 18486–18493
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA02830J
28 F Wang, G Liu, H L Meng, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Improved methane hydrate formation and dissociation with nanosphere-based fixed surfactants as promoters. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2016, 4(4): 2107–2113
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01557
29 F Wang, H Meng, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Methane hydrate formation promoted by −SO3−-coated graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(8): 6597–6604
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00846
30 F Wang, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Preparation of −SO3−-coated nanopromoters for methane hydrate formation: effects of the existence pattern of −SO3− groups on the promotion efficiency. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2017, 5(6): 2640–2648
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA08839B
31 Y Song, F Wang, G Liu, S Luo, R Guo. Promotion effect of carbon nanotubes-doped SDS on methane hydrate formation. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(2): 1850–1857
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02418
32 F Wang, Y Song, G Q Liu, G Guo, S J Luo, R B Guo. Rapid methane hydrate formation promoted by Ag & SDS-coated nanospheres for energy storage. Applied Energy, 2018, 213: 227–234
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.021
33 F Wang, Z Jia, S J Luo, S F Fu, L Wang, X S Shi, C S Wang, R B Guo. Effects of different anionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 137: 896–903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.021
34 R R Prajapati, S S Bhagwat. Effect of foam boosters on the micellization and adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2012, 57(12): 3644–3650
https://doi.org/10.1021/je3008155
35 Z Hu, W Verheijen, J Hofkens, A M Jonas, J F Gohy. Formation of vesicles in block copolymer-fluorinated surfactant complexes. Langmuir, 2007, 23(1): 116–122
https://doi.org/10.1021/la061532h
36 A Jackson, P Li, C C Dong, R K Thomas, J Penfold. Structure of partially fluorinated surfactant monolayers at the air-water interface. Langmuir, 2009, 25(7): 3957–3965
https://doi.org/10.1021/la802928f
37 F Wang, G Guo, G Q Liu, S J Luo, R B Guo. Effects of surfactant micelles and surfactant-coated nanospheres on methane hydrate growth pattern. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 144(144): 108–115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.01.022
38 A Shiloach, D Blankschtein. Prediction of critical micelle concentrations of nonideal ternary surfactant mixtures. Langmuir, 1998, 14(15): 4105–4114
https://doi.org/10.1021/la980153o
39 J B Evans, D F Evans. A comparison of surfactant counterion effects in water and formamide. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1987, 91(14): 3828–3829
https://doi.org/10.1021/j100298a020
40 H Tabuteau, L Ramos, K Nakaya-Yaegashi, M Imai, C Ligoure. Nonlinear rheology of surfactant wormlike micelles bridged by telechelic polymers. Langmuir, 2009, 25(4): 2467–2472
https://doi.org/10.1021/la803304z
41 R Petkova, S Tcholakova, N D Denkov. Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge. Langmuir, 2012, 28(11): 4996–5009
https://doi.org/10.1021/la3003096
[1] FEP-20028-OF-QC_suppl_1 Download
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Satish KUMAR, Ashwani KUMAR, N. K. SHARMA. A novel method to investigate voltage stability of IEEE-14 bus wind integrated system using PSAT[J]. Front. Energy, 2020, 14(2): 410-418.
[2] Seyed Saeed HOSEINI, Mohammad Amin SOBATI. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine operating on different water in diesel emulsion fuels: optimization using response surface methodology (RSM)[J]. Front. Energy, 2019, 13(4): 636-657.
[3] Hongjie ZHANG, Yachao ZENG, Longsheng CAO, Limeng YANG, Dahui FANG, Baolian YI, Zhigang SHAO. Enhanced electrocatalytic performance of ultrathin PtNi alloy nanowires for oxygen reduction reaction[J]. Front. Energy, 2017, 11(3): 260-267.
[4] Harald SCHWARZ, Xiaoshu CAI. Integration of renewable energies, flexible loads and storages into the German power grid: Actual situation in German change of power system[J]. Front. Energy, 2017, 11(2): 107-118.
[5] Xuzhan ZHOU,Shanshan LIU,Mingkun WANG,Yiping DAI,Yaohua TANG. Parameter identification of interconnected power system frequency after trip-out of high voltage transmission line[J]. Front. Energy, 2014, 8(3): 386-393.
[6] Zoheir EBRAHIM, Oliver R. INDERWILDI, David A. KING. Macroeconomic impacts of oil price volatility: mitigation and resilience[J]. Front Energ, 2014, 8(1): 9-24.
[7] Syamasree BISWAS(RAHA), Kamal Krishna MANDAL, Niladri CHAKRABORTY. Constriction factor based particle swarm optimization for analyzing tuned reactive power dispatch[J]. Front Energ, 2013, 7(2): 174-181.
[8] Chunji YAN, Maozhao XIE, . Stability of an annular viscous liquid jet in compressible gases with different properties inside and outside of the jet[J]. Front. Energy, 2010, 4(2): 198-204.
[9] ZHAO Zhiguo, XIE Maozhao. Impingement of hollow cone spray on hot porous medium[J]. Front. Energy, 2008, 2(3): 273-278.
[10] JI Junjie, LUO Yonghao. Combustion instability detection using the wavelet detail of pressure fluctuations[J]. Front. Energy, 2008, 2(1): 116-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed